- Jan 25, 2009
- 19,769
- 1,429
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Thanks for noting thatIt seems a few here are concerned about members who attend both MJ congregations and another church of a different denomination
Everyone is wondering if this is ok?
It is and staff have been operating this way for years at CFHow we keep the confusion down, is to have the member either tote the MJ icon or have their title announce that they are MJ or their siggy.
Bottom line is somewhere in view of all their posts , we need to be able to identify them as MJ![]()
Originally Posted by MarkRohfrietsch![]()
Trinity: This one is easy, Christian Forums SoF is the Nicene Creed; debate by anyone in any forum against the Trinity is therefore not allowed. It is included here because (as Tish stated earlier in the thread) there are non-trinitarian members of this forum, they may post here, but may not post against trinitarian doctrine, nor promote non-trinitarian theology either.
Who is MJ enough: This one is easy too; note our rule and the parts which I highlighted in red, and my notes in green:
Kosher diet and MJ observance of torah: As per Tish's reply; Discussion is fine, but debating that "my way is better than your way" or you "must do this, that and/or the other thing" will not be allowed; however it's fine to state that "for me I believe that I must..." or "while I do 'this'; I may not do 'that'", would be OK providing that one does not cross the line with the flaming rules I quoted above. Debating against Kosher or Torah, whether by a member or non member is not allowed in this proposal.Flaming and Harassment
● Do not insult, belittle, mock, goad, personally attack, threaten, harass, or use derogatory nicknames in reference to other members or groups of members. Address the context of the post, not the poster.
● If you are flamed, do not respond in-kind. Alert staff to the situation by utilizing the report button. Do not report another member out of spite.
● Do not state or imply that another member or group of members who have identified themselves as Christian are not Christian. (My note: MJs are considered Christians, this rule includes stating or implying that some are not or less MJ/Christian than others)
● Those who do not adhere to the Statement of Faith are welcome as members and participants in discussions, but you are required to respect these beliefs, even if you do not share them. (This addresses the trinity)
● Do not make another member's experience on this site miserable. This includes, making false accusations or persistently attacking them in the open forums.
● Respect another member's request to cease personal contact.
If a non member is present and being disruptive; report them. If you believe that someone is using an icon of convenience to disrupt your forum; report them. State your reasons in the report, and staff will review it, and action it accordingly... it's what we do!
It is not our desire to stifle meaningful discussion and debate; it is, however our desire to protect the members of the MJ fora, and (all) the members here from attack and harrasment; regardless of their personal levels of observance and adherence to the Torah and Kosher.
I hope that this clarifies things.
Mark
__________________
Other than some differences in beliefs and practice, the meaning of "Christian" and "Messianic" is pretty much synonymous. It means someone who follows Messiah.
So, if you "accept Christ" and follow him... yeah.
Originally Posted by MessianicMommy![]()
No one is called to observe exactly the same way all the time as someone else in the rest of the world. There are different flavors of Judaism the world over due to the various places Jews live. Someone in Yemen isn't going to observe Torah or the Talmud in the same way as someone in Scandinavia. Someone in South Australia won't be observing as someone in America.
We need to recognise a healthy difference in observation where this is concerned. No one is to be condemned for difference in observation, as even in America, differences are observed from shuk to shuk. No?
....There will be different views and opinions depending on the level of one's orthodoxy as to how they feel and interact with other Orthodox Jews, with Conservative, Conservadox, Reform, Reconstructionist and any other flavor there can possibly be of other Jews............we have different levels of observance here, and those of us who believe like others here, wish to discuss that level of observance unhindered. This is not something out of the ordinary.
And yes, I have met many Jews who have had absolutely no level of Jewish upbringing come into the movement and not know what to do. They come in to learn how to have a healthy balance in their belief and observance.
"To those not familiar with being Jewish, it might appear we are keeping the law, but actually we are just being Jewish. "
.......To those not familiar with Messianic Judaism, it may seem as if we're picking at nits, but truth be told, we're working out issues together with individuals in a way that a home group or cell group might not allow.
.........How the AMC/J4J and a Messianic congregation that is aligned with a mainline protestant denomination will see and teach Torah will be entirely different from how someone in the MJAA, UMJC and any other denominational Messianic movement around the world will. In fact, our level of observance here in Germany is vastly different than the majority who are in the Beit Sar Shalom umbrella. We align more with the local Jewish community in our beliefs and practices, because we do not worship on Sun/Wed, do not keep the Christian festivals (there are many more than are observed in the USA), and how we dress. You could pick us out as different in the crowd every time.
It is not a bad thing. It is just "different".
While my inlaws are not affiliated with anything like the AHC, they are for all intents and purposes Hebrew Catholics. DH's grandparents are learning about their Hebrew roots thank to Dr Ruth Lapide's Q&A series on BibelTV here in Germany, and have asked us a few questions when we get together. They're in their late 70s to mid 80s and due to the climate they grew up in, knew almost nothing of Judaism.
A mom of a friend of DH's works with in the German catholic church here, and mostly in the direction of Catholic-Jewish relations. I met her when I first moved here and was surprised to see her house has as many mezuzot as ours does, as well as a Sabbath set and a few other things she picked up on a couple visits to Israel.
While I might not agree with certain doctrines or practices, I see no need to not get along or support their efforts of walking out their faith as best they see fit.
I believe some of the division, confusion and upset is the vast difference between what is perceived as the Messianic movement in North America vs elsewhere, and how we came to be as a whole in the Americas being the bulk of the disagreement. Not "One Law", "Divine Invitation", "Two House" or any of the other smaller doctrinal differences... or even the different "umbrellas" of MJ.
Yesterday, while watching a history-related documentary about the Prohibition some of this discussion came to mind. Some of the very issues we're wrestling back and forth with, are the core issues that only are seen/handled in US congregations and the vastly different flavor we have from the rest of the world due to not only our world view, but the fact of where many of the congregations were began. Between the various Methodist, Baptist, Assemblies of G-d, Presbyterian and Catholic congregations that later encorporated Messianic services, or umbrella congregations, we have ethics, doctrines and dogma tagging along for the ride. This could be the difference between one's understanding of or allowance for liturgy, wine, more Jewish practice, mode of baptism and views on salvation/obedience/works. This would also mean a different understanding of involvement in the public/government sector as far as legislating morality.
Then you have also those "we're on our own" home group types that have a mishmash of everything up above...
Here in Europe and elsewhere, you find that the movement seems to be a little more solidified... not as many doctrinal differences, though different modes of worship, levels of kashrut, and percentage of Jew and Gentile worshiping together.
I have no problems meeting with someone from the MJAA, UCMJ or MIA or any other group. I find that at the core, we truly believe many of the same things. It's in practice, and some other doctrinal issues where we have some of the split hairs. Personally, I believe in two house, but not like the MIA teaches. I gain benefit from some of their teachers, but not all. I find benefit from both major camps of the MJ movement, but not in some avenues. I find major issue with the whole of the "Karaite" Messianic groups, and that I can't seem to get along with any of them because the issue of rabbinic authority always comes up, and they're right, we're wrong. I just get tired of it and move on.![]()
The continual claim of "mainstream Christian being opposite of Messianic Judism/Observance of Law" - has never seemed really consistent when it comes to the reality that mainstream Messianic Judaism has never made it a point to divorce from that which was Christian (except when dealing with mainstream Churches claiming the Law/Torah are not important or that God is done with the Jewish people) - for they noted often that much of what was said was never in conflict with Love for God's Law....or Jewish culture being valued/expressed.. We already had a rather extensive thread on the issue entitled Messianic History - with great variety of Messianic Jews throughout history...proudly Jewish and Christian - and never seeing any real disconnection with the Church.
To be Messianic Jewish or with Messianic Judaism is to walk out your Jewish heritage /lifestyle in honor of Yeshua - serving Him while honoring His Law. Nothing more, nothing less....and with that comes the reality of differing understandings of how to walk out God's Torah/God's Law - but in none of that comes seeking to be anti-Torah simply because of differences in observation. That'd be akin to someone saying another is "anti-Torah"/Non-Messianic simply because one doesn't feel pressure to adhere to purity laws in Leviticus 13 (needing a priest) when it seems those cannot be walked out - even though they observe in other ways - and someone who does value purity laws chooses to wage war against those people for noting what can apply in the times we live in.
But as long as it's assumed that being a Messianic Jew (or Messianic Gentile) means that nothing "mainstream" in Christianity is ever to be referenced, there will be false scenarios brought up.
But you learn to live with it...
Last edited:
Upvote
0

