On Benghazi, voters trust Hillary Clinton over congressional Republicans

[KatherineS]

On Benghazi, voters trust Hillary Clinton over congressional Republicans


Despite the growing fury over the Benghazi, Libya, consulate attacks among congressional Republicans, the American public remains unaffected by issue of Benghazi, still giving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton high favorable marks, and low marks to Republican lawmakers. According to a new Public Policy Polling poll released Monday, voters trust Hillary Clinton over congressional Republicans on the Benghazi attack that killed four American diplomats, 49% to 39%.

Hillary Clinton also holds a 52% approval rating, surpassing congressional Republicans’ rating of 36%. More than half of voters–57%–view GOP lawmakers unfavorably.

On Benghazi, voters trust Hillary Clinton over congressional Republicans — MSNBC

 

[JimR-OCDS]

I don't trust Hillary nor the Republicans in Congress who are blowing this all out of proportion.

The real blame goes to the one who decided to make a consulate in Benghazi.

The entire country is unstable and Americans risk their lives being outside the secure area, which only the embassy had.

It was known that Ambassador Stevens took risks traveling outside the embassy compound. This one cost him and others with him their lives.


Jim

 

[KatherineS]

I appreciate that Jim.

I guess it is now safe to say what we've known for a while. There was no consulate in Benghazi, is was a CIA office pretending to be a consulate.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

I appreciate that Jim.

I guess it is now safe to say what we've known for a while. There was no consulate in Benghazi, is was a CIA office pretending to be a consulate.

That's new information for me. But if it was CIA, what was Stevens doing there?

And if it was indeed CIA, Libyans would've been justified in taking it out. Also, if it was CIA, was it really Al Qaeda who attacked it?

Jim

 

[KatherineS]

That's new information for me.

I hope I didn't reveal something I shouldn't have.

But if it was CIA, what was Stevens doing there?

And if it was indeed CIA, Libyans would've been justified in taking it out. Also, if it was CIA, was it really Al Qaeda who attacked it?

Jim

Those are good questions.

 

[Wolseley]

I don't trust ANY of them----Hilary Clinton, the CIA, Republicans, Democrats.

And the two that I trust the least are Obama and Eric Holder. Two of the biggest liars, frauds, and criminals in American history.

 

[Struggling Sinner]

And the two that I trust the least are Obama and Eric Holder. Two of the biggest liars, frauds, and criminals in American history.

 

[KatherineS]

Of course, today's proven liars are the congressional Republicans who were caught doctoring a national security email.

For that, they should be impeached.

 

[Fantine]

Just on Benghazi?

I would trust Hillary Clinton more than House Republicans on just about anything...including things they could be expected to be more knowledgeable about, like how dinosaur fossils could be less than 6,000 years old...

 

[Kotton]

On Benghazi, voters trust Hillary Clinton over congressional Republicans

Thanks to the low information voter and the low factual media.

I havn't trusted Hillary since she and Bill were in the WH.

 

[Michie]

The President of the United States only knows what he sees on television, but seeing the chilling stuff the overseas press is covering, listening to Jay Carney (who seems puzzled to be asked real questions by the press) spinning on Benghazi, and the IRS...

Our idolatry has given us Benghazi, the DOJ, and the IRS. We always pay dearly for chasing after what is cheap...

 

[Wolseley]

This tells the story better than I can:

Now we know -- Team Obama both corrupt and incompetent

Goodwin: Storm clouds brewing in Obama-Land over Benghazi, IRS, AP scandals - NYPOST.com

 

[KatherineS]

Looking forward to the rest of the President's term and then EIGHT YEARS of Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JimR-OCDS]

I hope Hillary never runs, much less gets elected.

She is not just pro-choice, she's pro-abortion to the point of strong arming those who oppose abortion.

When she was 1st Lady, at the Cairo-5 Summit, in a speech she told 3rd world nations that they would not receive aid from the USA if they kept abortion illegal.

Also, she put the mandate in medicaid, that hospitals which do not provide abortion services, would not be reimbursed for care given to medicaid patients.

This force a Catholic hospital in my dioceses out of business, because they could not afford to provide care for elderly and poor people who were on medicaid, without being reimbursed, all because they didn't provide abortions. The policy made no sense, but this is how Hillary pushed her agenda.

Also, she is a sexist. Again when she was 1st Lady, she had a staff of 26 people, all women. The only male that she hired was a gay male who merely made coffee and ran errands for the staff. When she was questioned by a reporter why there were no males on her staff, she just laughed at the question.

Hillary is a person who should never be in the WH.

Jim