The temperature of the photosphere has nothing to do with magnetic fields.
It varies in the umbra of sunspots however, and you've not properly explained it. Magic magnetic fields doesn't cut it, particular since your power supply blew a fuse last year.
Your model is falsified by the observed temperature of the photosphere, so why should I take it seriously?
If those pesky lower umbra temperatures weren't observed, you might have no reason to worry. Since they do, you need "magical" magnetic fields to explain them in your model, whereas I simply need on more double layer of non opaque plasma to explain those low temperature plasmas in my model. I'll take physics of magic magnetic fields any day.
They still haven't been verified. It is just one theoretical measurement out of many. Also, differential rotation produce magnetic field lines.
Why would differential rotation produce *stable* magnetic fields? More magic with magnetism in your model.
You have also failed to show anything below the photosphere.
You've failed to address the mathematical models of sunspots and why the 171A light follows the penumbral filaments along their path *down into* the photosphere. As long as you simply remain in denial, what can I say?
What is the density of the flux ropes?
It's always greater than the surrounding plasma because the current is "pinching" the plasma together. It's likely to be many orders of magnitude more dense than the atmosphere around it. It certainly has more current running through it.
What is the density of the photosphere? What is the energy content of both? You keep ignoring this bit.
No, you keep ignoring the *current* and the magnetic pinch in creates. That is the 'bit' that keeps being ignored in the mainstream solar model. They left out the *electricity* that sustains it!
The only denial is your continued denial of the temperature of the photosphere and how magnetic fields already explain all of the features of sunspots in peer reviewed models.
They are "peer reviewed nonsense" based on magical magnetic field lines that now enjoy no power source thanks to HMI.
It's all explained without the need for any "rigid" plasma, which is just your fantasy anyway.
We haven't even discussed anything related to the evidence of "rigidity" yet. You haven't even figured out the light source in raw 171A images yet apparently.
The bottom line is that standard theory is missing the key ingredient. It's missing the *current* that sustains the light show. What it's got is a *kludged* (Alfven called it pseudoscience) understanding of electromagnetic behavior in plasma. Alfven's double layer paper explains the "reconnection" of current that occurs in a current carrying double layer, thus eliminating any 'magic magnetism". The mainstream simply needs to find the *electrical switch*.
The mainstream model doesn't even enjoy a steady power source at this point. The convection predictions have been called into question to the tune of two full orders of magnitude, not just "a little".
There is no "transition region" seen in SDO images. The flux ropes originate and can be observed to originate *underneath* of the surface of the photosphere in face on images of sunspots. The mathematical models jive perfectly with the images in 171A descending along the penumbral filaments.
The magnetic fields align with the hot spots as predicted in a Birkeland model, and the mass flows up and through the photosphere are also consistent with a Birkeland model.
As far as I can tell, you haven't even figured out that a Birkeland cathode model does not *require* solids to exit in the 'rigid' layer. That "stratification subsurface" of a cathode could simply be a more dense double layer of thick plasma.
Before you go "eliminating" other solar models, you'll first need to fully understand them, and have some idea of what makes them tick. A convection failure of two orders of magnitude is a major blow to mainstream theory. Convection is a primary power source for flare activity in mainstream models, and it's the only thing that would prevent mass separation from occurring. Without fast convection, mainstream solar theory is up a creek without a power supply paddle.
). As a result, the density scale height decreases and the plasma settles lower. "
