L
Lovely Lane
Guest
tis tis. Same old legal advise without a license to practice law. How does it feel to know so much law and never prosecuted a case?You recall my statements incorrectly. What I had stated numerous times was that given currently released evidence that I could not see a rightful or lawful charge because of the lack of probable cause. Does that ring a bell?
I also stated numerous times that the SAO has all the evidence and has a more complete picture of the event and thus anything we could say about the case beyond what evidence was released was in fact, speculation. Starting to sound familiar now?
Again, your definition of stalking is not relevant as we are speaking of law. Thus a legal definition is the only proper one.
Also, you failed to answer my questions and yet again speculated regarding Zimmerman's actions if he had not had a firearm.
You were wrong months ago, and you're wrong today, tis tis.
Upvote
0