How is this thread about marriage?
Looking at the broader affects of feminism and its influence on our society and the damage it is causing in a scope greater than the direct family destruction it is causing are valid arguments.
Is the goal here to tip-toe around every occurrence of that pernicious form of humanism that affects marriage by hook or by crook? (Let's make 100 rules for why we can't discuss what is really wrong with our marriages).
The economy (and the destruction of it) is one of the reasons cited for women absolutely having to work. Be poor or embrace feminism and an egalitarian two-income household. (This is an often stated goal of many feminists under the flag of "freedom" for women. What? The freedom to have to earn a living rather than being a mother to her children?) *the goal is to make complementarian marriage either grossly unappealing or impossible
I could think of more consequences if you'd like.
When people posit feminism as the ideology that must not be challenged on a forum ostensibly about Christ should anyone be surprised that someone takes up the challenge? What humanistic doctrine will we next try to combine with Christ?
Last edited:
Upvote
0