That reality then says, “Anything that I feel is good for me,” whether it be men with men, men with boys, women with young girls, or people with animals (people don’t stop with one thing).
This is silly. People and animals are completely different beings. It's so ridiculous that I can't even comment further.
But it is not that people are just standing back meekly, saying, “I want to be with my partner.” It is actually a campaign, a fervency to force themselves and you to accept their ideology.
This is because meekly standing back with a quiet voice leads to more oppression and discrimination.
No one who engages in homosexual activity is psychologically healthy.
This is simply fallacy. I know lots of homosexuals that are very healthy, and would be considered healthy, surely, by this doctor if she didn't know they were gay.
It all comes back to that, and so we have redefined what a family is.
Because it became necessary. When millions upon millions of children need SOMEONE to love them, a redefinition of family is required. Sure, you can say that a heterosexual married couple would be best. That's fine. I may be inclined to agree with you. But one person, or two same sex people, is much better than no one to love them and care for them. Living an entire life and growing up without one or more parents is a lot more damaging than say, having gay parents, or a single parent who never wants married but wants a child.
Aside from those few bits, I really enjoyed the reading, and it made me think.
Thanks for posting it! <3
Edit: Just wanted to say that although I disagree with her (obviously
), I would also like to commend her for still carrying the cross and holding firm to her Faith.
