No one said they didn't have authority.They have the authority to make such a pronouncement. We know why they know it to be true. They have clearly stated the nature of their evidence upon which they have based their judgment.
What if what they believe to be true are really lies?No, it proves they KNOW they have proof.
Yes they did, at the beginning.They never said the evidence wasn't conclusive.
I read the statement as soon as it came out. I know what it says. It contradicts what they said before. To many unanswered questions for proof. No one said the evidence WAS spurious I said it was possible. If the accuser is lying and they believe it then they could be believing lies. We don't know one way or the other. I'm not going to be satisfied the SOLT has concrete proof at this point. I'm waiting for the court case to unfold and see what comes of that first.The statement gives the nature of the evidence. The investigating team was made up of professionals. . Corapi's own emails are part of that evidence. That is hardly "spurious" evidence. And to state that the evidence they have is spurious is to demean the SOLT.
Its not an assumption at all. Its a fact because we don't have the evidence. All we have is the good word of the SOLT. The only ones who know the truth are those involved. We have no proof. You are choosing to believe the statements of SOLT, which is the right thing to do, but not guaranteed infallible truth.That is an unfounded assumption.
I read the SOLT statement.The SOLT claims differently and has taken action and declared Corapi unfit for ministry because of the facts they discovered.
Why not? We are if we are after transparency in all scandals.You are not entitled to the actual evidence.
No one said they didn't have authority.The SOLT has the actual evidence and they have the authority to judge and pronounce judgment on their member based on that evidence.
Who has accused the SOLT of anything? Certainly not I.It is uncalled for and calumnious to accuse the leadership of the SOLT, by insinuation, of incompetence or evil intent when they make the absolute claim they have the evidence to prove his guilt of the charges made against him, especially given Corapi's bizarre behavior, rank disobedience, flaming attacks against the Church and his superiors, and especially his paying off those who could accuse him $100,000 to sign a contract civilly binding them to absolute silence.
Probably so. Though I did manage to find out who the accuser was a couple months ago.You should never have the objective evidence in your hands. . . you probably never will unless someone leaks it,
Yea, if one chooses to trust them I guess. Its still odd they said the accusation didn't prove anything when they suspended him but now that he took his million dollars and ran, they say it does. Very odd indeed.You do, however, have those the Church has vested authority in to investigate and decide this telling you they have the evidence he is guilty and he is unfit for ministry.
Upvote
0