911 Towers Were Exploded Outwards, Not Collapsed

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

ManFromUncle

Guest
One of the first things Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who coordinated the destruction of the steel evidence at Ground Zero, did after the attack was prohibit almost all photography at the site. Police and FBI agents were ordered to confiscate cameras on the spot, although inevitably, as can be expected at such a massive crime scene, there were simply too many people swarming what was now viewed as history for such a stricture to be successfully enforced.

One key piece of photographic evidence that did survive the government's attempts to keep the public in the dark about what happened that day was an aerial photo taken on Sept. 23, 2001, long before major clean-up operations had begun. Rescue workers and firefighters were still primarily concerned with searching for human remains and even long-shot survivors. The clash between police and firefighters which took place as Giuliani hastened to the "scoop and dump" phase of the operation was Nov. 2.

The aerial photo shows what no other photo could in such clear and convincing detail: that the towers did not collapse down through the line of gravity, but were blown outwards in all directions for two or three times as far as the towers were wide, leaving a carpet of cleanly-cut steel beams and perimeter wall sections across the entire WTC complex. No force imaginable in a downward gravitational collapse can explain the lateral ejection of steel sections with the weight of bulldozers for up to two football fields, at clocked speeds of up to 70 MPH.

As can be seen in the aerial photo the steel beam pieces are mostly straight as arrows, un-deformed by heat, and cut neatly at the ends. The steel beams do not wind up in a mound, as one would expect, with the center of the tower's bases as the high point, but rather scattered fairly uniformly across the entire World Trade Center complex, which consisted of seven buildings. Perimeter sections, which consisted of 15-inch wide beam assemblies covered with aluminum cladding, can be seen lying thickly across WTC 6, nearly two football fields away. Each one of these pieces weighed up to 20 or more tons.

The official NIST report explained dust ejections (what are obviously demolition squibs) by saying "compressed air" forced the dust out of breaking windows. But no amount of compressed air can lift 20-ton steel assemblies and hurl them laterally for 400 feet, at 50 to 70 MPH.

Hence the reason for Giuliani's ban on photography at Ground Zero. No amount of instruction in physics or fire temperature calculations would be as dangerous to the official "collapse" theory as plain visual evidence of demolition, and people simply believing what their eyes are telling them. Steel falls down. Not out. And certainly not for these kinds of distances.

The below video narrated by David Chandler gives one of the best views of cut steel beam shooting upwards and outwards, not falling down through the line of gravity. Keeping in mind the massive scale of the towers (nearly a football field wide,) it must be remembered that what seem like tiny sticks are 10 foot long pieces of two-foot wide steel beam and larger, of which even the smallest would weigh nearly one ton.

North Tower demolition narrated by Architects and Engineers 911's David Chandler
‪David Chandler's brilliant-The North Tower exploding.m4v‬‏ - YouTube


[SIZE=-1]Circled pieces of steel beam and steel perimeter wall are approximately ten feet long[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] [/SIZE]


This rarely seen photo shows the width of the debris field and lateral ejections of steel and pulverized concrete debris, which can be explained only by high explosives.

[SIZE=-1]Photo: debris field width[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] [/SIZE]



The below map can be clicked on circled areas to show details of 5, 10, and 20-ton pieces of neatly cut steel beams and steel perimeter wall.

[SIZE=+1]click below image to go to full-size clickable map, click on circles[/SIZE]



From lower right-hand corner of above aerial map, leaning against outer edge of WTC 4
wtc4periman.jpg




From roof of WTC 4, massive perimeter wall sections, see 60-foot flatbed trucks at bottom for idea of scale.
wtc4close2.jpg



Perimeter wall sections under construction
perimeterscale.jpg


In addition to the patently impossible official explanation of the "collapse" of Building 7 (not hit by a plane), there are hundreds of other physical impossibilities in the official story. An attempted summary of the best evidence is here:

911: Shock and Awe Master Deed. Prosecute Giuliani.

This post merely attempts to assemble some of the lesser-viewed (and heard) evidence in one place, such as the explosions heard throughout the morning (probably charges weakening key strong points in the structures) such as the following (which disinformation artists and doubters attempt to dismiss as "boilers" or "fuel tanks." You decide.)

VIDEO: Explosions like this heard all morning

‪9/11: Explosion #1 W/ Download Link‬‏ - YouTube

Finally, here is an opportunity to hear what a known demolition sequence of explosions sounds like compared to the towers as they were destroyed.

VIDEOS: Sound of explosive charges, known demolition and South Tower, side-by-side

Castaways Demolition:
‪Castaways Implosion Demolition‬‏ - YouTube

North Tower:
‪911 truth: Demolition Pops at South Tower‬‏ - YouTube


VIDEO: Firefighter John Schroeder, who was inside North Tower, testifies to explosions inside, says building was "disintegrating" from core.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBb00PQR1zo"

Line of explosive flashes can be seen in North Tower at onset of demolition.
lineflashes.jpg


Flashes can be seen at :16 seconds into this video:
‪9/11 Truth - Cutter Charges‬‏ - YouTube

Please read: "911: Venturing a Theory of the Crime"

More at:

911 Shock and Awe: Towers were exploded outwards

Facebook for "Towers were exploded outward" website


Contact your congressman: Investigate 911 or you are committing treason.
 
Last edited:

mandyangel

Regular Member
Aug 27, 2010
2,018
256
✟18,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
These 9/11 conspiracy theories are an utter insult to the people who died that day and their families. I don't know if the OP is from America but you obviously don't know much about 9/11. I'm not smart enough to try to debunk paranoid conspiracy theories with no basis in reality point by point, I hope that somebody on this board does. But you posting this is a major insult to those families, America, and to me as a person.
 
Upvote 0

Rudolph Hucker

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2007
1,540
332
Canberra ACT
✟19,303.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Conservative
These 9/11 conspiracy theories are an utter insult to the people who died that day and their families. I don't know if the OP is from America but you obviously don't know much about 9/11. I'm not smart enough to try to debunk paranoid conspiracy theories with no basis in reality point by point, I hope that somebody on this board does. But you posting this is a major insult to those families, America, and to me as a person.

Nonsense. There is no insult either apparent or (I think) intended.

Without minimising the sadness at the deaths, there are genuine unanswered questions on the events of that day.
 
Upvote 0

mandyangel

Regular Member
Aug 27, 2010
2,018
256
✟18,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Nonsense. There is no insult either apparent or (I think) intended.

Without minimising the sadness at the deaths, there are genuine unanswered questions on the events of that day.

Oh,, really??? Over 3,000 people died and you think its not insulting to those people's memories or their families to continue to prepetuate disproven wack a doodle theories about what they lived through was a big conspiracy? Were the 19 muslim hijackers who threatened the people on those planes with knives, who stabbed pregnant ladies in the stomach, were they a conspiracy? Was the fact that those exact planes were the same ones to crash into the towers, killing everybody in both the planes and towers, was that a conspiracy?

OR..... is it just like this, you people hate America, you hate spooky Bush, you feel your more intellectually allined with the people in the Middle East, and you want to discredit America and the people living there by spewing your venom and garbage to anyone who will listen.

I think it might be that. But I could be oh so wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Rudolph Hucker

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2007
1,540
332
Canberra ACT
✟19,303.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Conservative
Oh,, really??? Over 3,000 people died and you think its not insulting to those people's memories or their families to continue to prepetuate disproven wack a doodle theories about what they lived through was a big conspiracy? Were the 19 muslim hijackers who threatened the people on those planes with knives, who stabbed pregnant ladies in the stomach, were they a conspiracy? Was the fact that those exact planes were the same ones to crash into the towers, killing everybody in both the planes and towers, was that a conspiracy?

OR..... is it just like this, you people hate America, you hate spooky Bush, you feel your more intellectually allined with the people in the Middle East, and you want to discredit America and the people living there by spewing your venom and garbage to anyone who will listen.

I think it might be that. But I could be oh so wrong.

I do not hate America.I do not hate Americans. I admire America. I admire many Americans. I do not admire Bush (but that is not relevant).

3000 deaths is indeed sad.

There remain unanswered questions about the events of that day.

Here is one: the 19 hijackers were Saudis. So Iraq was invaded? Is there any logic there?
 
Upvote 0

mandyangel

Regular Member
Aug 27, 2010
2,018
256
✟18,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I do not hate America.I do not hate Americans. I admire America. I admire many Americans. I do not admire Bush (but that is not relevant).

3000 deaths is indeed sad.

There remain unanswered questions about the events of that day.

Here is one: the 19 hijackers were Saudis. So Iraq was invaded? Is there any logic there?

Your completely right about that. But there is logic there. America really didn't anticipate 9/11 and we really didn't think it was possible. Because of that, the US did kind of fall down on the job in protecting us, but that is a far cry from a conspiracy.

After 9/11, the US had to look at the world differently. And the possibility of a another terrorist attack was really real, it could happen agian. And thats why Bush and the US saw a threat emerging in Iraq that could materialize into a another full blown attack in the US. So with the support of MANY other nations, including the British, AND most of the democrats in Congress, Iraq was invaded to rid the threat of being there.

Its actaully hysterical to me that all these liberals who backed our Dear Barack Obama, are all now going along with Obama, not only continuing the war in Iraq BUT also adding 2 NEW WARS to the list!!

And everybody thought Bush was the monger. Why do you think we are still in Iraq despite Obama's huge opposition. He was either:

1. playing all the libs for a fool, which I find utterly hysterical OR
2. got into the White House, saw the real intelligence and said oh my Lord, we are not coming out of Iraq, no way

And BTW it was also Dear Clintion was too busy with, um... other things, that he skipped the chance that he could kill Bin Laden when we had him cornered.

And now, I give both Bush and Obama credit for Osama's death and I couldn't be prouder to have been an America on that day and everyday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldbetang
Upvote 0

Rudolph Hucker

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2007
1,540
332
Canberra ACT
✟19,303.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Conservative
Your completely right about that. But there is logic there. America really didn't anticipate 9/11 and we really didn't think it was possible. Because of that, the US did kind of fall down on the job in protecting us, but that is a far cry from a conspiracy.

After 9/11, the US had to look at the world differently. And the possibility of a another terrorist attack was really real, it could happen agian. And thats why Bush and the US saw a threat emerging in Iraq that could materialize into a another full blown attack in the US. So with the support of MANY other nations, including the British, AND most of the democrats in Congress, Iraq was invaded to rid the threat of being there.

Its actaully hysterical to me that all these liberals who backed our Dear Barack Obama, are all now going along with Obama, not only continuing the war in Iraq BUT also adding 2 NEW WARS to the list!!

And everybody thought Bush was the monger. Why do you think we are still in Iraq despite Obama's huge opposition. He was either:

1. playing all the libs for a fool, which I find utterly hysterical OR
2. got into the White House, saw the real intelligence and said oh my Lord, we are not coming out of Iraq, no way

And BTW it was also Dear Clintion was too busy with, um... other things, that he skipped the chance that he could kill Bin Laden when we had him cornered.

And now, I give both Bush and Obama credit for Osama's death and I couldn't be prouder to have been an America on that day and everyday.

There are so many sidetracks in your post that could be pursued - nay, should be pursued - but I have some other stuff that I need to do.

For now, suffice it to say that in pursuit of the origin of the hijackers, there was no logic in invading Iraq. The fact that my own country went along with that decision is no justification.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mandyangel

Regular Member
Aug 27, 2010
2,018
256
✟18,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Sure its not but people always speak about how America is the evil doer and America starts wars everywhere and there was no reason to go into Iraq, and I'm just showing you that its not just America. You asked for justification. And I just want to say it wasn't just America who saw the threat in Iraq, it was other countries as well as the UK.
 
Upvote 0

Rudolph Hucker

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2007
1,540
332
Canberra ACT
✟19,303.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Conservative
Sure its not but people always speak about how America is the evil doer and America starts wars everywhere and there was no reason to go into Iraq, and I'm just showing you that its not just America. You asked for justification. And I just want to say it wasn't just America who saw the threat in Iraq, it was other countries as well as the UK.

There was an unsubstantiated, barely credible and unrelated threat in Iraq.

The perpetrators were Saudis - why not attack Saudi Arabia?






(FWIW I have visited Iraq once, and Saudi Arabia many times).
 
Upvote 0

Museveni

Homo Sapiens Invictus
Feb 28, 2007
892
52
Sweden
✟8,845.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Put two empty toiletrolles on the table close to eachother(but not to close, see next part).

Put one of your hands palm up on the table betwen the toiletrolls.

Fill your open hand on the table with flour or a similiar substance(i.e debries)

Now slam your other(open otherwise it'll really hurt) hand down on the other as hard as you can as if your were clapping


EXPLOSIONSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
 
Upvote 0

Zoooma

Hating Living :(
Mar 15, 2010
7,534
962
Hudson River Valley, NY
✟19,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It's sad how this garbage is obsessed over despite the evidence that exists. The psychology behind it reveals people who have this deep down need to feel special by knowing more than everyone else. It makes them feel good about their pathetic lives. For some it's just an irrational a deep-rooted hatred of America. I mean, no, we shouldn't just flat out blindly trust our government but this??!?!?!?!? Give me a break.

Ideally these people need to be slapped around and put in their place.

Or they just need to be IGNORED completely. Don't give them the satisfaction of an argument. Just ignore them. No response at all. Please.

911ribbon1.jpg
 
Upvote 0

mandyangel

Regular Member
Aug 27, 2010
2,018
256
✟18,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
It's sad how this garbage is obsessed over despite the evidence that exists. The psychology behind it reveals people who have this deep down need to feel special by knowing more than everyone else. It makes them feel good about their pathetic lives. For some it's just an irrational a deep-rooted hatred of America. I mean, no, we shouldn't just flat out blindly trust our government but this??!?!?!?!? Give me a break.

Ideally these people need to be slapped around and put in their place.

Or they just need to be IGNORED completely. Don't give them the satisfaction of an argument. Just ignore them. No response at all. Please.

911ribbon1.jpg

Well said and love the pic. Never forget!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

KerrMetric

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2005
5,169
226
63
Pasadena, CA
✟6,671.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
There was an unsubstantiated, barely credible and unrelated threat in Iraq.

The perpetrators were Saudis - why not attack Saudi Arabia?


(FWIW I have visited Iraq once, and Saudi Arabia many times).

Actually - this lends itself more to the idea it was not some inside job. Wouldn't they have framed some Iraqis by your logic?

Yes there are unanswered questions just like there are unanswered questions about Germany invading Poland in 1939 or the battle of Rorke's Drift or the 1948 Olympics in London or the Challenger disaster in 1986. There are unanswered questions in every single major event of any description throughout human history. But that doesn't mean there is some super secret all encompassing conspiracy. I don't need to know where beam #13114B exactly fell into beam #13115C and whether it was at temperature 1340F or 1456F 27 minutes after a plane hit the North Tower. There will always be unanswered questions.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.