The Beauty Of Conservative Women

okafor

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2011
842
68
United States
✟1,361.00
Faith
Wesleyan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

RedDead1981

Prayer is beautiful when it's sincere
Jul 4, 2010
2,806
168
✟14,181.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Ann Coulter. Blech blech blech. (and I'm highly unbiased when it comes to women. Michelle Malkin is hot, if annoying)

Some of them are all right. Lila Rose, Dana Loesch, not bad. Never heard of them, but not bad.

And Sarah Palin? Maybe 20 years ago. Not now.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,262
6,943
72
St. Louis, MO.
✟371,163.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I enjoy reading Ann Coulter. Very witty. But that l--o--n--g face...


anncoulter.jpg



12841-MAWI.jpg
 
Upvote 0

RedDead1981

Prayer is beautiful when it's sincere
Jul 4, 2010
2,806
168
✟14,181.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Coulter has no problem broadbrushing Democratic women (and also pulls out the always reliable "HAHA LOOK FAT CHICKS LOL", so that makes her ugly as sin in my eyes. To quote...

Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling...
...
My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.
Yeah. Very pretty.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This may be armchair psychology, but I believe that Coulter has experienced something in her life that has made her a bitter, unhappy woman. But instead of dealing with that bitterness in an appropriate way, she projects it onto Democrats/liberals and makes them the source of all her problems.

What she needs is a good psychiatrist who can help her overcome that crushing bitterness and hatred. Instead, she transfers her sickness onto her audience of conservative readers, who learn how to be hateful and bitter themselves and "pass it on". It's like a vicious circle.

Not to derail, but that's my theory: I think Coulter's either a woman who has failed to deal effectively with pain and bitterness in her life, or she's an entertainer who says controversial things because she knows it will earn her big bucks. Or it could be both.
Ringo
 
Upvote 0

chaz345

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2005
17,453
668
57
✟20,724.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This may be armchair psychology, but I believe that Coulter has experienced something in her life that has made her a bitter, unhappy woman. But instead of dealing with that bitterness in an appropriate way, she projects it onto Democrats/liberals and makes them the source of all her problems.

What she needs is a good psychiatrist who can help her overcome that crushing bitterness and hatred. Instead, she transfers her sickness onto her audience of conservative readers, who learn how to be hateful and bitter themselves and "pass it on". It's like a vicious circle.

Not to derail, but that's my theory: I think Coulter's either a woman who has failed to deal effectively with pain and bitterness in her life, or she's an entertainer who says controversial things because she knows it will earn her big bucks. Or it could be both.
Ringo

Do you see this same "diagnosis" as applying to any number of liberal commentators?
 
Upvote 0

okafor

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2011
842
68
United States
✟1,361.00
Faith
Wesleyan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
This may be armchair psychology, but I believe that Coulter has experienced something in her life that has made her a bitter, unhappy woman. But instead of dealing with that bitterness in an appropriate way, she projects it onto Democrats/liberals and makes them the source of all her problems.

What she needs is a good psychiatrist who can help her overcome that crushing bitterness and hatred. Instead, she transfers her sickness onto her audience of conservative readers, who learn how to be hateful and bitter themselves and "pass it on". It's like a vicious circle.

Not to derail, but that's my theory: I think Coulter's either a woman who has failed to deal effectively with pain and bitterness in her life, or she's an entertainer who says controversial things because she knows it will earn her big bucks. Or it could be both.
Ringo

That is really bad amateur psycholgy. It doesn't even occur to you, does it, that she might simply recognize Democrats/Liberals for who they are? Ann is angrey and bitter about the damage Democrats/Liberals are doing to the country she loves, so she must need psychiatric help to "overcome" a problem.

This is the same cluless disconnect and condescension demonstated by Thomas Frank in writing What's the Matter With Kansas?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

chaz345

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2005
17,453
668
57
✟20,724.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Is this going to derail into a moral equivalency shouting match?
Ringo

Well since the "rails" of the OP are ill defined at best......

And I wasn't talking about any moral equivalency I was just wondering if you saw the same thing in blowhard political pundits ( a category I certainly put Coulter in) that you happen to agree with their position.

It's not about which side's pundits are morally superior, it's about whether or not you see the same, or VERY similar behavior the same way when the position is one you may agree with as opposed to disagreeing with it.
 
Upvote 0

chaz345

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2005
17,453
668
57
✟20,724.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No....Coulter is just angry and bitter period. It has nothing to do with Democrats and liberals. She has an anger problem which happens to make her a lot of money.
Ringo

If it makes her a lot of money, it is really a problem? :D:D
 
Upvote 0

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Well since the "rails" of the OP are ill defined at best......

And I wasn't talking about any moral equivalency I was just wondering if you saw the same thing in blowhard political pundits ( a category I certainly put Coulter in) that you happen to agree with their position.

It's not about which side's pundits are morally superior, it's about whether or not you see the same, or VERY similar behavior the same way when the position is one you may agree with as opposed to disagreeing with it.

I don't really see a liberal equivalent of Coulter. The closest may be Michael Moore, though I don't think he comes anywhere near Coulter's venom.

If it makes her a lot of money, it is really a problem?
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif

Serious answer: yes, because she's only hurting herself and spreading the anger and bitterness around.

As I said above: it's like a vicious circle.
Ringo
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,489
13,109
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟361,517.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Given the number of times left wingers have been admonished for sexualizing (or commenting on the looks of) right wing pundits, I'm kind of dissapointed that this thread came to be... moreso that it was started by a conservative.

It doesn't even occur to you, does it, that she might simply recognize Democrats/Liberals for who they are?
If that was the case, more people would recognize the validity of what she says. But as it is, she really just insults them instead of just being able to recognize that "perhaps we just disagree with what constitues best governance". I mean seriously America, what happenned with just "disagreeing"?
To me, that's a sign of immaturity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seashale76
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟79,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Just a mistake in numbering, I think. There's no number 3.
There was also two #6's and no 5 which to mean indicates there were some ties. The big mistake though is that Michelle Malkin definitely should have been #1
 
Upvote 0