Let's Talk About Hell (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I wasn't comparing Adventists to Mormons, I was just objecting to the name-calling. Python doesn't have a case so he resorts to name calling. I think I'll start calling him a spiritist. Its all in good fun and he believes the same thing the spiritists believe anyway. Perhaps he will hold a seance for us and rap the table. Granpa Jones can you hear me? Woo Woo, I'm scared now, I just saw a glowing light, it must be a ghost.

Jesus as a "spiritist".

Matthew 10:23
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell

Luke 24:39
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have

Standard Jewish belief in Jesus' day...
...Of course EXCEPTING the Sadducees.
...Who believed the dead knew not anything AND would forever remain that way.

Acts 23:9
And there arose a great cry: and the scribes that were of the Pharisees' part arose, and strove, saying, We find no evil in this man: but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God

The common Jew on the street....
...In the following case this INCLUDES the early Christians.
...Early Christian "spiritists" as you call them.

Acts 12:15
And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they, It is his angel

It = Peter's angel ( as in Peter had become an angel or SPIRIT )....
...Which is EXACTLY what the Sadducees rejected could happen.
...And exactly what Jesus had told them was their ERROR.

You want to affirm that part of the Sadducees error you can...
...This is a free country and you have the ability to choose.
...It's simply not in keeping with what the Bible teaches.
...Perhaps your own traditions justify your belief - I'm at peace with that.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
840
✟21,514.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Jesus as a "spiritist".

Matthew 10:23
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell

Luke 24:39
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have

Standard Jewish belief in Jesus' day...
...Of course EXCEPTING the Sadducees.
...Who believed the dead knew not anything AND would forever remain that way.

Acts 23:9
And there arose a great cry: and the scribes that were of the Pharisees' part arose, and strove, saying, We find no evil in this man: but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God

The common Jew on the street....
...In the following case this INCLUDES the early Christians.
...Early Christian "spiritists" as you call them.

Acts 12:15
And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they, It is his angel

It = Peter's angel ( as in Peter had become an angel or SPIRIT )....
...Which is EXACTLY what the Sadducees rejected could happen.
...And exactly what Jesus had told them was their ERROR.

You want to affirm that part of the Sadducees error you can...
...This is a free country and you have the ability to choose.
...It's simply not in keeping with what the Bible teaches.
...Perhaps your own traditions justify your belief - I'm at peace with that.

Jesus is a Spiritist, that's a new one.
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you coming to bed?
I can't this is important.
What?
Someone is wrong on the internet.


Good Night Pythons.
Thanks LLOJ.

Thanks for your back and forth conversation with me in this thread Timothew.....
....It's good there is a record of it so that interested folks can read our respective points.
....Seriously, thank's Timothew.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I think it was agreed awhile back that North Dakota was hell.
I vote Fukushima ...
:) That may be next on the devil's list, but he has to take Georgia first :angel:

YouTube - The Devil Comes Back To Georgia Lyrics
funny-graphs-devil-down-geo.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timothew
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I vote Fukushima ...
Oh my.
I just now noticed this thread started on the "twilight zone" Eschatology board :D :p

http://www.christianforums.com/t7551267/#post57206660
Could Japan be Mystery Babylon?

There are more than a few coincidences linking Japan with Babylon ...

Not much doubt about the merchants of Japan being great ... not much doubt about Christian blood spilled by the Japanese in WWII ... not much doubt about the historical ruthlessness of the Japanese ... just ask the Koreans, Filipinos and others.
 
Upvote 0

Lysimachus

Vindicating our Historic Biblical Foundations
Dec 21, 2010
1,762
41
✟9,605.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Private
Pythons,

I'm not quite sure why you keep appealing to the Jewish belief system of hell.

Edward W. Fudge, in his book "The Fire that Consumes" (500+ pages), along with Dr. LeRoy Edwin Froom in his 2 volume set "The Conditionalist Faith of our Fathers" (2,476 pages), has done an elaborate and extensive job proving that the ideas inherent in later Jewish philosophy were influences originally bread in Hellenism.

I would encourage you to read these books. It's some tough reading, but it's well worth it. "In Search for the Immortal Soul" by Daniel Knauft is an excellent resource as well.

So although you can continue to appeal to the later Jewish writings until we are blue in the face, the data is so impressively overwhelming concerning the Hellenistic influences on Jewish thought on the estate of men after death, that arguing on the interpretation of passages through the eyes of Hellenistic Jews would be well to be left alone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Pythons,

I'm not quite sure why you keep appealing to the Jewish belief system of hell.

For one really big reason Jesus was a Jew who was speaking to Jews in a Jewish context...
...To ignore what ALL Jews ( except the Sadducees ) believed at that time is to read out of context.
...All Jews except for the Sadducees believed in an immortal soul or spirit of man.
...And that included Jesus and His Apostles.
...According to the Scriptures.


Lysimachus said:
Edward W. Fudge, in his book "The Fire that Consumes" (500+ pages), along with Dr. LeRoy Edwin Froom in his 2 volume set "The Conditionalist Faith of our Fathers" (2,476 pages), has done an elaborate and extensive job proving that the ideas inherent in later Jewish philosophy were influences originally bread in Hellenism.

Yes, those are both SDA's Lysimachus.....
...And both also claim the Bible teaches that Christ was able to "mutate"...
...And that Christ pre-existed the Incarnation as Michael the archangel.
...And that Christians are not to eat shrimp and other foods considered unclean by Jewish religious standards.
...I've read some of Froom - I wasn't impressed.


Lysimachus said:
I would encourage you to read these books. It's some tough reading, but it's well worth it. "In Search for the Immortal Soul" by Daniel Knauft is an excellent resource as well.

So although you can continue to appeal to the later Jewish writings until we are blue in the face, the data is so impressively overwhelming concerning the Hellenistic influences on Jewish thought on the estate of men after death, that arguing on the interpretation of passages through the eyes of Hellenistic Jews would be well to be left alone.

That's like saying since other religions that "pre-date" Christianity had saviour gods who sacrificed themselves for man & god's that had 12 apostles that would indicate Christ was influenced by these heathens. I'm not buying that - not by a long shot.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
840
✟21,514.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's like saying since other religions that "pre-date" Christianity had saviour gods who sacrificed themselves for man & god's that had 12 apostles that would indicate Christ was influenced by these heathens. I'm not buying that - not by a long shot.
It isn't quite the same as saying that. From the beginning Christianity said that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and is the Savior of mankind.

We are saying that the Old Testament Saints believed one thing, and then after Greece became a major power greek philosophy corrupted the original message.

You need to realize how influential the greeks were. Not correct, but very influential. Alexander conquered most of the known world 300 years before, and greek soldiers and settlers brought greek ideas everywhere they went. It's like saying that European culture influenced America, which it did. There are Native American Christian Churches and Mexico is a Catholic Nation. The Aztecs were not Catholic.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
H

Heavens

Guest
The only souls that are "immortal" are these who are rewarded with it;

(Rom 2:7) To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

As is evident, it is only to those described who seek it, in well doing and patience.

Is someone here actually preaching otherwise to support their idea of a monster god torturing sinners forever?


 
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
4,529
925
America
Visit site
✟267,463.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The only souls that are "immortal" are these who are rewarded with it;
(Rom 2:7) To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

As is evident, it is only to those described who seek it, in well doing and patience.

Is someone here actually preaching otherwise to support their idea of a monster god torturing sinners forever?

Yes. to word it correctly one does not have immortality in this life, neither the soul that one has. The soul does persist as it was created to do, with our being made in the image of God. If we are saved we have eternal life according to God's promise, and it is the hope of those of us who are saved to put on immortality after our life in this world, in the resurrection that is coming or for those who remain in their being caught up. Those not so saved will remain in their sin and be judged fairly for it, and as it can not be paid fully in limited time by fallen man, their judgment is endured forever. This fairness does not involve a "monster god" nor is torture meant by it.

He is love, unlimited unlike the love we may have although it is modeled for us, but in his perfect justice Yahweh will not turn a blind eye to sin, but deals with all of it. We are warned, so direction can be changed, but woe to any that do not change direction to be in Christ and so be covered by his payment and remain in their sin. Christ is the gracious cover for us who took the burden.

God is not willing that any should perish. If you really do know Christ, you are saved, God works in you, you love him, and with his work in you, you will not ultimately reject him and you will go to heaven. Some are insincere playing at Christianity. For those hearing of him and not responding, if that persists one remains under judgment. If one has truly never heard of him there is the need to seek God for evidence of God is manifest, and God rewards one seeking with more knowledge, but many are hardened against seeking, and the gospel needs to be spread to give all more opportunity, which is God's will.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7449497-26/#post54621432
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lysimachus

Vindicating our Historic Biblical Foundations
Dec 21, 2010
1,762
41
✟9,605.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Private
For one really big reason Jesus was a Jew who was speaking to Jews in a Jewish context...
...To ignore what ALL Jews ( except the Sadducees ) believed at that time is to read out of context.
...All Jews except for the Sadducees believed in an immortal soul or spirit of man.
...And that included Jesus and His Apostles.
...According to the Scriptures.

In every single instance where there is "hell-fire" involved, Christ always puts it in context of "the end of the age". Nobody is burning in fire right now. That's just insane. In fact, it's ridiculous! And quite frankly, it makes Christianity out to look, well, quite laughable, if not despicable. Were I an atheist, I'd be so turned off by your theology, it wouldn't even be funny.

Never once did Jesus or the Apostles claim to believe in the Jewish belief system of hell.

Yes, those are both SDA's Lysimachus.....
...And both also claim the Bible teaches that Christ was able to "mutate"...
...And that Christ pre-existed the Incarnation as Michael the archangel.
...And that Christians are not to eat shrimp and other foods considered unclean by Jewish religious standards.
...I've read some of Froom - I wasn't impressed.

No they are not. Edward W. Fudge is a Baptist evangelical (author of The Fire That Consumes). Froom is the only SDA here. And even if both were SDA's? AND? So WHAT?! That's just TOO BAD!! LOL I trust SDA theologians FAR more than the hermetic-dragon-church father quoting theologians of the era. :p

You weren't impressed with Froom? You better get back to reading more. There are 2 volumes. Don't pretend to know Froom's arguments without going over at least 70% of what is written in both volumes. SDA or not, Froom is considered an "authority". Protestant evangelicals use his works all the time.

SDA's also appeal to the works of Fudge. Once again, he isn't an SDA.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In every single instance where there is "hell-fire" involved, Christ always puts it in context of "the end of the age".

There is "FIRE" mentioned in Luke and the word "hell" is also there.

Luke 16:19
There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

The above appears to taking place prior to "the end of the age"....
...Because a little later Jesus says the guy wants to go back and warn his brothers.
...Who have not died yet.

Please don't say this does not mean what it says.....
...Jesus' teachings were all things that DID or COULD happen.
...God does not have to teach truth with lies.
...Which is where you would need to push this, right?


Lysimachus said:
Nobody is burning in fire right now. That's just insane. In fact, it's ridiculous! And quite frankly, it makes Christianity out to look, well, quite laughable, if not despicable. Were I an atheist, I'd be so turned off by your theology, it wouldn't even be funny.

Ok,

2 Peter 2:3
For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment

Well Lysimachus, I would simply say it might not be such a good idea to fashion a God that fits your liking...
...I think it would be better to accept God is the way He is.
...And know that just because you find something offensive.
...You can't wish it away because it offends you.


Lysimachus said:
Never once did Jesus or the Apostles claim to believe in the Jewish belief system of hell.

You mean to say never once did the Sadducees claim to believe in hell...
...Jesus rebuked the Sadducees grave error that the soul did not continue after death of the body.


Lysimachus said:
No they are not. Edward W. Fudge is a Baptist evangelical (author of The Fire That Consumes). Froom is the only SDA here. And even if both were SDA's? AND? So WHAT?! That's just TOO BAD!! LOL I trust SDA theologians FAR more than the hermetic-dragon-church father quoting theologians of the era. :p

You also believe that it was possible for Christ to mutate and sin AND loose His salvation...
...You also belive Christ pre-existed as Michael the archangel, along with Lucifer the archangel.
...And a whole host of other archangels.


Lysimachus said:
You weren't impressed with Froom? You better get back to reading more. There are 2 volumes. Don't pretend to know Froom's arguments without going over at least 70% of what is written in both volumes. SDA or not, Froom is considered an "authority". Protestant evangelicals use his works all the time.

SDA's also appeal to the works of Fudge. Once again, he isn't an SDA.

What do evangelicals use Froom for "all the time" I know many evangelicals and I'm guessing....
...If I asked them if they ever heard of Froom they would say; what?, Who?

SDA's also appeal to the works of George Storrs and in fact I have appealed to the work of Storrs...
...In my discussions with SDA's and JW's.
 
Upvote 0

Lysimachus

Vindicating our Historic Biblical Foundations
Dec 21, 2010
1,762
41
✟9,605.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Private
The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus

I want you guys to notice something about this sermon. Take careful note to the "precept upon precept, line upon line" methodology employed by the speaker in the following video presentation. There is something else I ask that you all do. As you are watching the following presentation, I ask that you place the following verses forefront in your mind:

I invite you to read the following verses slowly:

"For the Lord giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding." Proverbs 2:6

But how are we to attain this knowledge?

"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man." 1 Corinthians 2:14

In other words, those who are in the spirit, and are spiritual, can discern spiritual things.

"That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." John 3:6

Therefore, we see that when we study spiritual things, we must pray to God for spiritual discernment. Those who are not of the spirit have a strong tendency to interpret that which is to be interpreted spiritually literalistically. We see this example with the woman at the well in John 4:10-11. At first, she completely missed it. She thought Jesus was talking about literal water. So then Jesus had to explain. In John 2:18-20, Jesus said to "destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up", and the Jews answered that it took 46 years to build the temple! In John 3:4 Nicodemus asked Jesus how a man can be born when he is old and enter the second time in his mother's womb, yet Jesus was speaking of a spiritual birth. In John 6:54 Jesus mentioned that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood has eternal life, yet in verse 52 the Jews asked "how can this man give us his flesh to eat?" In all these instances, these "natural Jews" were lacking spiritual discernment, and literalized everything Jesus said. They completely missed it! It went RIGHT over their head! Even Christ's own disciples were constantly expecting Christ to take the literal throne in Jerusalem, even though he repeatedly reminded them that "his kingdom was not of this world". History is being repeated in that earthly teachers are literalizing a great number of spiritual symbols, including the teaching of an earthly, literal, reign of Christ on earth at literal Old Jerusalem (when it is in heaven, in the New Jerusalem), among many other things.

The same thing is happening today with modern-evangelical teachers ALL over the globe regarding the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus (including the concept of an earthly, and not heavenly millennium). This story is being used to teach that Hell currently exists under the earth right now, and it is the place where the spirits or souls of the wicked dead depart to suffer the eternal torment of never-ending wailing agony. Even though the rest of scriptures contradict this literal teaching that is being falsely derived out of this parable!

So now I would like to turn your attention to watching this video presentation (divided into 6 parts) from beginning to end. You will be glad that you did. Take note to the simple, yet thorough exegesis employed by the speaker regarding this parable. It is grounded upon solid principles. Be patient, because as he goes, things will get really interesting! :)

I ask that you pray for spiritual discernment as you watch the following videos. Ask yourself, "am I spiritually discerning this lesson here? Or am I reflecting what the "natural Jews" did with Jesus' words in His day?" As you watch and listen, pray and think about it. :)

The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus ~ by Pastor Stephen Bohr




Part 1
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 1/6


Part 2
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 2/6


Part 3
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 3/6


Part 4
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 4/6


Part 5
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 5/6


Part 6
YouTube - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus 6/6


It is my prayer that we will allow these plain teachings to speak to our hearts and souls, and that we will not allow the pride of opinion to get in the way from accepting the truth, and only the truth.

The dead are really dead. Only the living know anything. The soul that sinneth, it shall die. Ezek 18:20.

May we rest in the blessed hope of the resurrection when all the righteous will be caught up to meet the Lord in the air at the same time!

God bless

Lysimachus


P.S. For those interested in learning the deep spiritual hidden meaning to the "Souls under the Altar", click the following video to watch Pastor Sephen Bohr's presentation on this EXTREMELY missunderstood passage from Revelation. You'll have to find parts 2-6 on the right pane. Souls Under the Altar[/b]
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus
Tis a kewl parable :thumbsup:

Lazarus and the Rich Man - Here a little, there a little - Commentary

The parable of Lazarus and the rich man has been the foundation for many of the erroneous beliefs about "hell" within traditional Christianity.
Some have viewed it not as a parable, but as a true story Yeshua told to give details about the punishment of sinners in hell........

Kindgdom Bible Studies Template Page

....................Then why was the singular used - "this parable"?
It should be clear to any thinking mind that all these stories were ONE PARABLE, like the facets of a diamond, as they turn each scintillates with new brilliance.........

The Rich Man and Lazarus | Bible.org - Worlds Largest Bible Study Site

Jesus had just given a parable about wealth and taught that you cannot serve both God and money. The Pharisees were lovers of money (Luke 16:14) and scoffed at Jesus.
So He tells them another parable about trusting in money. He even begins it the same way he began the last parable - with the phrase, there was a certain rich man...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lysimachus

Vindicating our Historic Biblical Foundations
Dec 21, 2010
1,762
41
✟9,605.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Private
There is "FIRE" mentioned in Luke and the word "hell" is also there.

Luke 16:19
There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

I believe that the Rich Man and Lazarus was a parable. Jesus clearly taught that our body parts do not burn up till the end of the age. In this parable, there are tongues, fingers, bosoms, and eyes involved. Watch Pastor Bohr's entire sermon as he appeals to the works of Josephus to prove his points.

The above appears to taking place prior to "the end of the age"....
...Because a little later Jesus says the guy wants to go back and warn his brothers.
...Who have not died yet.

Please don't say this does not mean what it says.....
...Jesus' teachings were all things that DID or COULD happen.
...God does not have to teach truth with lies.
...Which is where you would need to push this, right?

It "appears" so, but it's not so! Or else it would contradict the rest of scriptures.

Ok,

2 Peter 2:3
For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment

Well Lysimachus, I would simply say it might not be such a good idea to fashion a God that fits your liking...
...I think it would be better to accept God is the way He is.
...And know that just because you find something offensive.
...You can't wish it away because it offends you.

It's truly sad that there are minds out there that are warped with this insidious pagan mythology. No wonder they can never see anything we talk about concerning God's law, because the mind is so filled with this foolish garbage. These kinds of doctrines may very well prove the undoing of many in the last days, as they will be deceived by the wonder-working miracles of demons because they cannot see clearly concerning the estate of the dead.

Your language emanates the same teachings being emanated by false teachers such as that of Perry Stone, who is a FALSE prophet!

The first major blunder Perry makes is in failing to recognize that in order to comprehend what the Apostolic authors meant in the Greek for the New Testament, we must think in the “Hebrew mind”. The Greek language, by classification, is a pagan language, stooped in mythology. With the gospel going out to the gentile Greeks, it is no wonder the Apostles wrote in Greek. Unfortunately, as these Apostles wrote down their thoughts, they struggled for the best Greek words to express their Hebrew thoughts.

The first question that must be asked is, can one honestly conclude that when the Angels sinned in heaven, they were immediately cast down into chambers below the earth in 2 Peter 2:4?

Let’s quote the full verse, and then evaluate what Peter is really saying:

“For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell [Tartaroo], and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment.” 2 Peter 2:4

Is Peter saying that Satan and his angels were literally cast into underworld pits of fire? Let’s compare:

“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12:9 -- notice the same language, but in the literal sense.

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!” Isaiah 14:12

Peter is clearly using the word “hell” (tartaroo) to represent the earth, in it’s sin-stricken, and fallen state. The earth truly was the “lowest” place anyone could dwell in the entire universe, as it is was the only planet that ever fell. Peter states that when the angels sinned, God cast them to hell, and the Apostle John in Revelation 12:9 clearly indicates this same definition to represent the “earth”. Isaiah calls it “the ground”. All 3 verses above are speaking about the same event, when Satan was cast out of heaven! The clear proof that Satan and his Demons are not in some confined underworld is that Satan beguiled Eve through the serpent. He appeared to Christ and tempted him while he was in the wilderness for 40 years, and he debated with God in heaven over the fate of Job. The demons could also not possibly possess a human being if they were confined to some underworld. Yes, they are confined! But to this “earth”! This earth is the “lowest part” (because it is sinful) of the universe! They are ROAMING the SURFACE of this earth. That’s how they tempt people and cause so much strife!

Perry Stone also mentioned that the word “Sheol” is translated as the word “Hell” 31 times, and then added immediately after “sometimes as grave”. He seemed to ignore the fact that Sheol is ALSO translated as “grave” 31 times (the same amount of times as hell) as well, and “pit” 3 times. That’s a vast difference from “sometimes”. However, regardless of how many times “Sheol” is translated into a word, the Hebrew word “Sheol” will always be “Sheol”. According to the concordance, the word “Sheol” itself gives no indication as the abode of spirit demons, or fallen angels. It primarily represents “the abode of the dead”, also known as the “grave.” If you visit any cemetery, take off the grave stone, and open up the lids to the grave, you will see that the casket was buried “in a pit”. Hence, Sheol is also rightly interpreted as “pit”. A pit is “down” in the earth, and thus rightly fits an idiomatic representation for the “underworld”, because it is “beneath the earth”. There is no indication of any “conscious spiritual existence” in the place of Sheol, no matter how you look at it. In the Hebrew mind, Hell, the Grave, and the Pit were all the same thing – “Sheol”. There was no “fire” in this place. Thus, when the Hebrew authors made use of Greek words Tartaroo, Hades, and Abussos, we must bare in mind that these words were just that—Greek pagan words stooped in mythological mystery. But even then, there is NO “fire” or “burning” associated with the words “Sheol” or “Hades”. Any concordance will reveal this.

The word “tartaroo” contains the Strong’s definition of a place where wicked are held for “punishment”, according to Greek mythology. According to scripture, “the wages of sin is death”. The punishment of the wicked is death, not eternal life, yet people continue to falsely translate “punishment” as meaning to represent suffering while one is “conscious”. However, in 2 Peter 2:4, the word “tartaroo” is being used as a verb according to Strong’s definition. The entire phrase “cast down to hell” is used to replace the active verb particle “tartarwsav” (which is the actual word used in 2 Peter 2:4). All Peter is really saying is that Satan and his Angels were cast out of heaven, down to this dark, dreary, and sinful planet. A planet full of death, disease, and suffering! The euphemism rightly fits!

The only Greek word for Hell that represents a place of burning is “Gehenna”. It should be noted that Gehenna was on the surface of the earth. I shall discuss this in greater detail in the next section below.

When 2 Peter 2:4 states that God delivered them into “chains of darkness”, Peter is not referring to literal chains binding demons in “underground chambers” as Perry states. Demons are clearly roaming the earth, and tempting people. They will be reserved to these chains “unto judgment”. When did this time begin? The moment Satan and his angels were cast down to heaven on this earth. When is judgment day? When Christ comes in the clouds of heaven at his Second Coming. Ever since Satan was thrown out of heaven, he and his angels have been in “chains of darkness”. King David prayed “Bring my soul out of prison, that I may praise thy name: the righteous shall compass me about; for thou shalt deal bountifully with me.” Psalms 142:7. Was King David’s spirit literally confined to a prison? Obviously not, as David was alive while praying this. The prison simply represents the “prison house of sin”. The “chains of darkness” represent the confinement to this dark and sinful world. That is all! To literalize this would be to bring reproach upon God’s sacred symbolism.

Satan will be bound by a chain of circumstances for 1000 years on this desolated earth while there are no humans to tempt. His greatest joy is to deceive, harass, and make people’s lives miserable. Every single wicked human being will be dead during this 1000 year period, and every single righteous being will be in heaven during this time.

It is my invitation to Pythons, to come out of this Babylonian doctrine. Because this doctrine comes from Babylon. This is nothing more than pagan mythology--and it makes Christianity out to look absolutely despicable.


You mean to say never once did the Sadducees claim to believe in hell...
...Jesus rebuked the Sadducees grave error that the soul did not continue after death of the body.

Don't know what scriptures you are alluding to here. I would have to analyze the exact verses you are referring to where you say Jesus rebuked the Sadducees for the "grave error that the soul did not continue after death of the body".

You also believe that it was possible for Christ to mutate and sin AND loose His salvation...

If someone were to say this in front of my face, I must confess, I'd be very tempted to slap them for making it sound so "eery" and stupid. But it's a good thing I'm a Christian. When God gave up His only begotten Son, it was a GREAT risk! And this risk demonstrates to the world just how much the Father loved us, and how much His Son loved us--even at the risk of Losing His own Son. Because your mind is in the gutter concerning these valuable treasures, it is impossible for you to grasp the infinite cost that has been paid for your redemption. You truly do not appreciate what Jesus has done for you. You would rather cling to your Hermetic Dragon worship, as you are a confused man about the estate of the dead. When you say stupid stuff like "mutate", it goes to show that you are not a discerner of Spiritual things. You are a very proud individual who is unwilling to let go of his errors.

It is very Biblical to believe that Jesus could have fallen. This is why He had to "overcome". If He did not "overcome", then it means there was no risk, and He didn't even have to "try" to resist temptation. Just the fact that Jesus was "tempted" as we are, PROVES that there was a risk involved of Him losing salvation. But we can overcome as Christ overcame.

...You also belive Christ pre-existed as Michael the archangel, along with Lucifer the archangel.

I believe Michael was another name for Christ, and I believe that Christ was and is equal with God, and that he was the "highest messenger" (arch angel) sent to this earth!

...And a whole host of other archangels.

What do evangelicals use Froom for "all the time" I know many evangelicals and I'm guessing....
...If I asked them if they ever heard of Froom they would say; what?, Who?

Baloney. You need to give up your monstrosity of stupidity, and join the truth.

SDA's also appeal to the works of George Storrs and in fact I have appealed to the work of Storrs...
...In my discussions with SDA's and JW's.

And? What's wrong with appealing to someone who has made some good Biblical points? Regardless of their life? If someone makes a good point, I appeal to them! I could care less about the individual! Arguments are arguments, and they either stand on their own two feet or they don't, regardless of the life of the individual.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.