"Kind" isn't a valid term in taxonomy. Please be more specific.
Kind is the only term we can use since taxonomy relates things which are unrelated (in my opinion they are unrelated - unrelated by birth/common descent). Kind is a commonly used word. It's found in the dictionary. It's got nothing to do with evolution (common descent).
Reptiles also glide and birds like kiwis, penguins and ostriches are flightless, so that's "birds fly. Reptiles crawl on their bellies." out the window.
The point is, reptiles are not birds. I don't think lizards and snakes and turtles belong to one kind.
As for amphibians being modified fish and reptiles being modified amphibians, do some research* on it. Don't just say "I don't think so." or "No." without having the foggiest what you're talking about.
You must have me confused with somebody else. I didn't say anything about amphibians being modified fish.
Again, do some research*. Don't just make stuff up. All animals have a measure of intelligence, and all animals have "abilities". "Spirit", lol, evidence?
Well the difference between us and the animal kingdom is huge. We have the intelligence and the ability to believe in God. We have the ability to understand and come to the knowledge of God.
And animals do have abilities and intelligence. Every kind has a range of abilities. Some birds can fly faster than other birds. Some can't fly at all.
Yes, this orangutan is spear fishing.
*REAL research, not creationist propaganda site research.
Real research? All animals have the ability to learn behaviour. You can train dogs. My cat's got me trained. LOL
Upvote
0