OphidiaPhile
Well-Known Member
- Sep 26, 2008
- 2,919
- 188
- 56
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
My "opinion" as you put it are based on scientific reality and are not emotional in any way, what in fact you are accusing me of is exactly that which you display. you choose to disregard actual scientific in favor of an opinion with no valid data to support. I do not bas opinion of emotion or conjecture if there is not hard evidence I do not form an opinion.Hi there
In communication, may I point out 2 of your current practices, demonstrating you are highly defensively emotionally charged. Now, you may want to modify/change them IF your goal is to have another person accept your current limited opinions:
The fact of the matter is there has never been one verifiable case of a homosexual being changed to heterosexual and if it were not natural it would not be something that is verifiable in thousands of species. If I were using those inconsistent with the usage of my assertion you would be correct of which you are not.1. Usage such as always, never, not once" are known as 'Universal Quantifiers': they create a chemical reaction chain in brains, that would occur AS IF it really were always, every, or never; otherwise known as communication meta-model violations.
Iow,
so long as you keep telling yourself (whatever), you'll create this rut in your brain, that deepens,
until any insight to the contrary is 'deleted or ignored'; because it doesn't match your preferred perception, of
the reality you want to create.
The term is Garter snake not garden snake and ther are venomous species of Garter snake. And again if there was a single quantifiable instance of a homosexual person being converted I would not use the descriptors That I have.For instance (since you work with snakes ), say someone fearful of snakes says "EVERY snake is deadly, either by Constriction, or Poison; so I must avoid ALL snakes & I can NEVER touch, or god forbid hold one, or I must ALWAYS die". - Now both you & I know, that (perception of reality), is not in fact, reality. A little grass, or garden snake (when known as such), is mostly harmless. -
Well,
Science and Psychology have proven it is not a choice therefore your assertion is invalid.Anytime you respond to someone's work experience, like "Homosexuality is an established behavioral-choice/pattern, that skillfully can be changed" then, you could, & did say
[/QUOTE]2.
2. this word "but" tries to negate, everything before it; why do that? - in this case once again, new info incoming, you choose rejecting,
because it doesn't match your preferred perception, of the reality you want to create.
So what you maintain currently, is not really reality, and certainly not, "societal consensus" of reality. -
It is
merely once again your preferred perception, of the reality you personally want to create.
Funny how transparent/naked someone's communication can be, eh? -
It's ok tho; because I am not trying to *change* your opinions, I will leave that to you.
You have given no info, only opinion and conjecture, neither of which are valid without data to back them up.
Upvote
0