Oh my! Gay Bible?

Secundulus

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2007
10,065
849
✟14,425.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
*emphasis mine*

It's true. In Finland, at least one confessional Lutheran pastor who refused to share the altar with women who intended to distributed communion has been arrested and tried for discrimination.
This reminds me of the ancient testimony of my "Forum namesakes" end.

Under the fifth persecution under Severus, "and Secundulus died in prison."!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
51
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It's not illustrated, though. There are lotsa stories in Judges that I would love to see illustrated in the LOLcat Bible.

Illustrated is nice, but I want a pop-up Bible. I want to load the animals on to Noah's Ark myself. ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
51
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It is just a book! It is meant to be funny! It is a work of fiction, nobody is banning King James version of the bible- And he changed a lot of it!

Which book is meant to be funny? The Gay Bible or the Lolcatz Bible? I wonder if you'd have the same nonchalant attitude if people did this to one of Paganisms holy books. Do you have any that could be spoofed?
 
Upvote 0

Izdaari Eristikon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2007
6,174
447
69
Post Falls, Idaho
✟32,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Married
What the heck is the "Spirit of the Milk" is that some sort of sexual euphemism I've never heard before? My uncle is gay and I have to say I've never heard him use that phrase before....
He said "the spirit of Milk", not "Spirit of the Milk". It's not sexual at all, but a reference to the gay martyr, Harvey Milk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Which book is meant to be funny? The Gay Bible or the Lolcatz Bible? I wonder if you'd have the same nonchalant attitude if people did this to one of Paganisms holy books. Do you have any that could be spoofed?
Ya, that LOLcat is the one meant to be funny.

It's like a wiki thing where people who sign in can help write it... it isn't just the site that writes it & it's done.
It's an ongoing thing.

Well you notice they don't mess with any other religion's holy books -
it seems to just be Christianity for some odd reason.

Let me guess why :idea:
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeacaHeaven
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This reminds me of the ancient testimony of my "Forum namesakes" end.

Under the fifth persecution under Severus, "and Secundulus died in prison."!!!!!!
I always wondered what your name meant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeacaHeaven
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟18,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
this is an extreme, that show cases a common practice people use in their "theology".

This group cares nothing at all for the concept of scriptural truth. The bible is simply a tool that they can use to promote their view and thus changing the bible is fine because there is no assumption at all that the bible itself contains truth that we must discover, understand, or adhere to. They are just using it as a form of propaganda.

This is obviously blatant and extreme. However, 'gay theology' and other kinds of theology like liberation theology, black liberation theology, etc.. have been doing basically the same thing for years. They usually don't go so far as to actually physically rewrite the bible... but they really don't care at all what the bible was intended to mean or to teach.. they are only concerned with how they can use the bible to support their ideas. Thus they go in looking for ways to make the bible mean what they want it to mean.

This group has just taken it to the next, extreme step and simply rewritten the bible to say what they want it to say.

I don't say this in a triumphalistic sense, but the reality is people who do things like this are just storing up wrath for themselves.
reminds me of the liberal "christians" in the gay debate forum


suddenly because David had a close relationship with someone hes gay
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
reminds me of the liberal "christians" in the gay debate forum


suddenly because David had a close relationship with someone hes gay
Under law, he'd of been stoned to death for that (as David writes out how He LOVES GOD'S LAWS & obeys them & meditates on them day & night).
Even most gay advocates admit the OT is clearly condemning homosexuality. So that's real interesting how David loves the Law, while he rejects the homosexuality laws?? :scratch:

Even still, David was later in sin of adultery; it would only go to prove that he fell into sin.... in no way would it condone homosexuality any more than it would condone adultery.

& as I remember it, if they bothered to study it deeper in the Hebrew language, that type of relationship those 2 had was about equivalent to being 'blood brothers' - almost like a pact they made together.
It was a close blood relative type of union, not sexual love.

Simple manipulation to try to condone what is forbidden.
2 Pet. 3:15-16 is clear that manipulating the bible is done
to our own destruction - it doesn't make something true for us.
 
Upvote 0

cesty

Philippians 4:19
Jul 29, 2008
730
68
Visit site
✟8,825.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.
(2 Timothy 4:3-4 NKJV)
 
Upvote 0

HerbieHeadley

North American Energy Independence Now!
Dec 23, 2007
9,746
1,184
✟15,282.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Well, after seeing the pop up advertisements here asking me to pick my Gay and promoting such a website, I think it is just a matter of time before this website starts to promote and sell this scripture revisionist heresy as well.
I’m shocked that this website has sunk so low.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, after seeing the pop up advertisements here asking me to pick my Gay and promoting such a website, I think it is just a matter of time before this website starts to promote and sell this scripture revisionist heresy as well.
I’m shocked that this website has sunk so low.
:eek: :o :confused:

"pick my gay" ?
well, I don't know what that ad's all about, but one I saw awhile back
was for the Hellboy 2 movie

:o

I don't know if they have control over the ads from some places?
But clearly there's enough members here who claim Christianity while
they promote premarital sex, homosexuality and abortion....

sign of the times?
 
Upvote 0

Optimax

Senior Veteran
May 7, 2006
17,659
448
New Mexico
✟41,659.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Under law, he'd of been stoned to death for that (as David writes out how He LOVES GOD'S LAWS & obeys them & meditates on them day & night).
Even most gay advocates admit the OT is clearly condemning homosexuality. So that's real interesting how David loves the Law, while he rejects the homosexuality laws?? :scratch:

Even still, David was later in sin of adultery; it would only go to prove that he fell into sin.... in no way would it condone homosexuality any more than it would condone adultery.

& as I remember it, if they bothered to study it deeper in the Hebrew language, that type of relationship those 2 had was about equivalent to being 'blood brothers' - almost like a pact they made together.
It was a close blood relative type of union, not sexual love.

Simple manipulation to try to condone what is forbidden.
2 Pet. 3:15-16 is clear that manipulating the bible is done
to our own destruction - it doesn't make something true for us.

The relationship between David and Jonathan was certainly the "blood brother" type of relationship.

They made a covenant together.

1 Sa 18:1-4
18:1 And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David , and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.

2 And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house.

3 Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.

4 And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David , and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.
KJV

Does not say specifically that it was a blood covenant.

However the exchange that occurred was common with blood covenants.

David also carried the responsibility of the covenant with Jonathan to the descendants of Jonathan.

2 Sa 9:1-6
9:1 And David said, Is there yet any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him kindness for Jonathan's sake?

2 And there was of the house of Saul a servant whose name was Ziba. And when they had called him unto David, the king said unto him, Art thou Ziba? And he said, Thy servant is he.

3 And the king said, Is there not yet any of the house of Saul, that I may shew the kindness of God unto him? And Ziba said unto the king, Jonathan hath yet a son, which is lame on his feet.

4 And the king said unto him, Where is he? And Ziba said unto the king, Behold, he is in the house of Machir, the son of Ammiel, in Lo-debar.

5 Then king David sent, and fetched him out of the house of Machir, the son of Ammiel, from Lo-debar.

6 Now when Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan , the son of Saul, was come unto David , he fell on his face, and did reverence. And David said, Mephibosheth. And he answered, Behold thy servant!
KJV

This is also part of a blood covenant.:)
 
Upvote 0

MrJim

Legend 3/17/05
Mar 17, 2005
16,491
1,369
FEMA Region III
✟42,622.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, after seeing the pop up advertisements here asking me to pick my Gay and promoting such a website, I think it is just a matter of time before this website starts to promote and sell this scripture revisionist heresy as well.
I’m shocked that this website has sunk so low.

free adblocker software ~ you'll never see it:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The relationship between David and Jonathan was certainly the "blood brother" type of relationship.

They made a covenant together.

1 Sa 18:1-4
18:1 And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David , and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.

2 And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house.

3 Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.

4 And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David , and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.
KJV

Does not say specifically that it was a blood covenant.

However the exchange that occurred was common with blood covenants.

David also carried the responsibility of the covenant with Jonathan to the descendants of Jonathan.

2 Sa 9:1-6
9:1 And David said, Is there yet any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him kindness for Jonathan's sake?

2 And there was of the house of Saul a servant whose name was Ziba. And when they had called him unto David, the king said unto him, Art thou Ziba? And he said, Thy servant is he.

3 And the king said, Is there not yet any of the house of Saul, that I may shew the kindness of God unto him? And Ziba said unto the king, Jonathan hath yet a son, which is lame on his feet.

4 And the king said unto him, Where is he? And Ziba said unto the king, Behold, he is in the house of Machir, the son of Ammiel, in Lo-debar.

5 Then king David sent, and fetched him out of the house of Machir, the son of Ammiel, from Lo-debar.

6 Now when Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan , the son of Saul, was come unto David , he fell on his face, and did reverence. And David said, Mephibosheth. And he answered, Behold thy servant!
KJV

This is also part of a blood covenant.:)
Hey that's awesome confirmation, thanks.

I had studied that awhile back and it looks like my memory isn't
completely gone -yet. lol ^_^

Thanks for typing out that detail too. :thumbsup:
I think it's a shame that people will just grab onto a theory becuz
it fits what they want the bible to teach instead of actually
looking to see what it's really saying.

How in the world can that make something true in reality?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums