such language is quite unbecoming of a lady.
But it's the truth.
race is immutable and innocuous. depravity is not.
So what if homosexuality isn't immutable? Even if homosexuality were a choice, it wouldn't mean that it should be persecuted. Painting your bedroom blue is a choice. Should we outlaw that, as well?
Homsexuality
is innocuous. All claims of how homosexuality hurts people are either:
a) common to heterosexuality as well. For instance "It spreads AIDS." Which is untrue; AIDS is spread by promiscuity and recklessness, not homosexuality.
b) based off religion. And the 1st Amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
c) based off of simple prejudice.
Now, the only argument that I somewhat agree with is people who say that "gay marriage" is against the definition of "marriage". But that's just semantics, that still leaves no reason to oppose civil unions with the same benefits as marriage.
NeTrips, have you seen
this link? Almost the exact same things are said about gay marriage as were said about interracial marriage.
If you would support the black rights movement, and not the gay rights, then yes, you are a hypocrite, and no better than any opposer of the black civil rights movement. Once you have your rights, you are happy joining in the oppression. How is that anything but hypocrisy?