evolution&dogs, book 2

Grengor

GrenAce
May 10, 2005
3,038
55
35
Oakley, California
✟18,998.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Republican
The point should be that the 800 breeds of dogs don't have anything to do with evolution. Domestic animals are bred and not permitted to evolve - just as people are now self-breeding and no longer evolve.

Those 800 breeds of dogs are all seperate species. They changed over time to become what they are today. How exactly is this not evolution?

And I cant even make sense of your last sentence. Could you please clarify?
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,752
64
Massachusetts
✟341,769.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Those 800 breeds of dogs are all seperate species. They changed over time to become what they are today. How exactly is this not evolution?
Dog breeds are not separate species, but they are examples of evolution: evolution in response to intense selective pressure imposed by humans. Evolution occurs within species as well as causing new species.
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
Dog breeds are not separate species, but they are examples of evolution: evolution in response to intense selective pressure imposed by humans. Evolution occurs within species as well as causing new species.
Dog breeds ARE separate species by strict biological definitions.

Its much the same as the relation between donkeys and horses. They are in the same genus and family however they are distinctly different species.

These different breeds of dogs rose from human breeding.
 
Upvote 0

Key

The Opener of Locks
Apr 10, 2004
1,946
177
Visit site
✟19,007.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I love the tone here, as always, and if I have a tone of the same kind towards Evolutionist they get all upset, Humm, I guess the Golden Rule does not apply in this form.

Seems, treating people like idiots is the common flavor of this form, so, when I responded in that manner, IE: I treated Evolutionist like they are idiots, they get upset, I wonder why really, I mean after all, treat others as you would like to be treated, if you like to act condescending to others, then you must enjoy being treated in an equal manner, I'll do my best to oblige.

Yes, we all know that Species are what ever we decide to call it as the flavor of the month.

Yes, Dogs are not Evolution, but simple Genetic Drift, and the affects of the Designer in the Scheme of things.

Now you call can attack me as well, and tell me how much I don't know about evolution, and maybe I might even here a few bits like "I need to be guided by the Genetic Spirits to fully grasp the Theory".. or some such.

So, Separate Species are life forms that do not breed with each other, by affect of several means, boundaries, desire, inability, to name the major ones.

So, which of these are affecting Dogs? Care to enlighten me?

God Bless

Key.
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
Key, is English your first language? Because that was nigh-uppon un-intelligible, but Ill try and salvage what I can and respond

Yes, Dogs are not Evolution, but simple Genetic Drift, and the affects of the Designer in the Scheme of things.
You attribute 800 different varieties of dog to genetic drift? Please tell me you're kidding.

Now you call can attack me as well, and tell me how much I don't know about evolution
After that last statement you made...

So, Separate Species are life forms that do not breed with each other, by affect of several means, boundaries, desire, inability, to name the major ones.

So, which of these are affecting Dogs? Care to enlighten me?
Im guessing you're asking what the barriers are for certain species of dogs to breed.

Dog breeds havent reached the point where two different breeds are genetically incompatible, they will in future, but as of yet that hasnt happened. The biggest barrier is size, a Great Dane cannot mate with a Chihuahua. It just cant happen naturally. The only way it can happen is if a human being uses artificial insemination.
 
Upvote 0

arunma

Flaming Calvinist
Apr 29, 2004
14,818
820
39
✟19,415.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
OPer clearly has no idea what he is talking about....

let's all pretend we have knowledge of things we don't, it's fun and builds ourselves up.

Give me a break! Did I actually just read that?

Yes, I see your point. Threads like this make me feel that people who aren't biologists (whether creationist or "evolutionist") really shouldn't talk about evolution.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,752
64
Massachusetts
✟341,769.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Dog breeds ARE separate species by strict biological definitions.
I'm sorry, but all domestic dogs are in fact classified by biologists as a single species, Canis familiaris. If not prevented by humans, dogs will mate freely outside their breed, causing massive gene flow across breed lines; the breeds would, in fact, quickly disappear if they were not artificially maintained by humans. That means they are not species.

Its much the same as the relation between donkeys and horses. They are in the same genus and family however they are distinctly different species.
Horses and donkeys are separate species because they seldom hybridize, and the hybrids that are produced are of greatly reduced fertility. As a result, there is very little gene flow between the populations, with or without human intervention.

These different breeds of dogs rose from human breeding.
Certainly -- that's why they're called "breeds".
 
Upvote 0

fromdownunder

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2006
944
78
✟9,024.00
Faith
Atheist
The idea of a male Great Dane breeding naturally with a female Chihuahua (or vica versa) totally boggles my mind.

So, while technically and within the rules of biology, they are still the same genus (species), reality suggests that they are not.

I am pretty certain that the day will come when certain breeds of dogs will not be able to reproduce viable and fertile offspring from other breeds, certainly not in my lifetime, but it will happen. It's called evolution.

Norm
 
Upvote 0

Pesto

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2006
957
27
✟16,297.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Dog breeds ARE separate species by strict biological definitions.

Its much the same as the relation between donkeys and horses. They are in the same genus and family however they are distinctly different species.

These different breeds of dogs rose from human breeding.
They are not distinct species. One of the criteria of distinct species is that they cannot produce viable offspring. Frumious Bandersnatch was very astute in pointing out that dogs would be best classified as a ring species.
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,752
64
Massachusetts
✟341,769.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The idea of a male Great Dane breeding naturally with a female Chihuahua (or vica versa) totally boggles my mind.
If all dogs besides chihuahuas and great danes disappeared tomorrow, the survivors would very likely form two species. As it is, however, there are many intermediate sizes of dog that permit gene flow throughout all breeds.

So, while technically and within the rules of biology, they are still the same genus (species), reality suggests that they are not.
The reality that matters is whether they form permanently separate genetic populations as far as evolution is considered.


I am pretty certain that the day will come when certain breeds of dogs will not be able to reproduce viable and fertile offspring from other breeds, certainly not in my lifetime, but it will happen. It's called evolution.
Certainly possible.
 
Upvote 0

Pesto

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2006
957
27
✟16,297.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
No we KNOW that. Its scientific and objective fact. One of the things that happen with two species that split (Man and apes for example) is the in-ability to cross-breed after a length of time.
We don't know that it will happen. It certainly could and is well on its way, but dogs could easily be bred back to on single interbreeding population, ignoring the obvious resistance among pure-bred enthusiasts.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Dog breeds are not separate species, but they are examples of evolution: evolution in response to intense selective pressure imposed by humans. Evolution occurs within species as well as causing new species.

Would you consider dogs to be a ring species?
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,752
64
Massachusetts
✟341,769.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Would you consider dogs to be a ring species?
I would consider them similar to a ring species but not actually to be one; ring species usually refers to a geographic distribution of interbreeding populations that overlaps in one place. But defining species is not my field.
 
Upvote 0

Key

The Opener of Locks
Apr 10, 2004
1,946
177
Visit site
✟19,007.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Because Steezie seems to be unable to grasp any post of mine that might consist beyond one line, I am thus limited at what type of response I can provide.

No we KNOW that. Its scientific and objective fact. One of the things that happen with two species that split (Man and apes for example) is the in-ability to cross-breed after a length of time.

Again, you assume this.

The idea of a male Great Dane breeding naturally with a female Chihuahua (or vica versa) totally boggles my mind.

Maybe, but it is still possible, and they will make every effort to try. If a female dog goes into heat, any dog, regardless of size difference will try to mate with the heated dog.

And, note that if a female Great Dane were to lay down, a male chihuahua could in effect mount and even impregnate the female dog.

So, while technically and within the rules of biology, they are still the same genus (species), reality suggests that they are not.

They are the same Species, unless you are to imply that Humans of different skin color would have been separate species in the 1800, because of cultural stress to not breed with each other.

I am pretty certain that the day will come when certain breeds of dogs will not be able to reproduce viable and fertile offspring from other breeds, certainly not in my lifetime, but it will happen. It's called evolution.

Again, this is an assumption and don't you think something like 6000 years of dog and horse breeding, would have generated this effect by now? The irony is, it has not, nor do I believe based on the evidence I have that it will ever happen.

However I shall leave the door open, but, also respect that so far the evidence is against it.

God Bless

Key
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
I love the tone here, as always, and if I have a tone of the same kind towards Evolutionist they get all upset, Humm, I guess the Golden Rule does not apply in this form.

As soon as you start presenting evidence instead of complaints you will have a point.

Yes, we all know that Species are what ever we decide to call it as the flavor of the month.

The definition for living species has never changed. What is difficult is determining if two populations fit the definition. Speciation is about gene flow. If there is no gene flow between two populations when given a chance then they are, by definition, separate species. As you can guess, it is rather difficult to track the extent to which two groups interbreed.

Yes, Dogs are not Evolution, but simple Genetic Drift, and the affects of the Designer in the Scheme of things.

Dogs are under extreme selection, not genetic drift. While artificial selection may be more strict than that found in nature it is not different in kind. Humans selecting dogs for their fur color is no different than elk selecting wolves for speed.

So, Separate Species are life forms that do not breed with each other, by affect of several means, boundaries, desire, inability, to name the major ones.

Separate species are two POPULATIONS that do not interbreed. Infertility between two individuals may not indicate speciation of the larger group.

So, which of these are affecting Dogs? Care to enlighten me?

Size. Some dog breeds are physically incompatible.

An even stranger situation is english bulldogs. They have been bred for such large heads and narrow hips that some pups can not be birthed naturally. They must be extracted by caesarian. This breed is extremely dependent on humans for their survival.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums