What do you think about this possible scenario?
It is interesting that Lucifer is termed a "Covering Cherub."
Ezekiel 28:16
"By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire."
Psalms 18:10
"And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind."
This verse from the Psalms makes me wonder if the cherub he rides on.... could look much like the proverbial Pegasus?
Revelation 19:11
"And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war."
Revelation 6:2
"And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer."
Jeremiah 8:6
"I hearkened and heard, but they spake not aright: no man repented him of his wickedness, saying, What have I done? every one turned to his course, as the horse rusheth into the battle."
IF.... the original form of the Covering Cherub Lucifer was similar to Pegasus........... then Lucifer getting jealous over YHWH having a son..... and a daughter.... ADam and Eve.......(and before that time a number of Elohim children who made Adam and Eve in their image)...... would help to make some sense out of this as well.
Could jealousy have gotten the whole war started?!
[size=+1]Perhaps what was said above will take some time to be fully realized, not that I say 'one is right and one is wrong' but I do not think you fully comprehend the impact of what has been stated. As for Barabbas:
Bar = Aramaic for 'a son'
Bar-Abbas = 'Son of [the] Father'
Barabbas was most assuredly the typology of the scapegoat. A most critical text was omitted from the Textus Receptus and probably because it was deemed far too 'Jewish' in its revelation. And this revelation of what was actually occurring just before the crucifixion, filling up the typology, has deep penetrating and ominous consequences for some of modern mainstream Christianity and modern theory concerning blood atonement theology, (particularly those factions teaching that 'Jesus is their scapegoat'). However, the extant miscellaneous manuscripts which compile the Greek Morph Texts, or so-called GNT Morph, contain the following account from the Matthew passage concerning Barabbas:
Matthew 27:16-17 KJV (Textus Receptus - full name of Barabbas omitted)
16. And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas.
17. Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ?
Matthew 27:16-17 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented - GNT Morph Texts)
16. Eichon de tote desmion episemon legmen Iesoun {*} Barabban.
17. Sunegmenon oun auton eipen autois ho Pilatos, 'Tina thelete apoluso humin, Iesoun {*} ton Barabban e Iesoun ton legmen Christon?'
Thus from the GNT Morph Texts the Word basically states:
Matthew 27:16-17
16. Moreover they had at that time a notable prisoner having been called YESHUA BARABBAS.
17. They accordingly having been gathered together, says to them the Pilate; Whom would ye that I should LOOSE-LET-GO unto you, YESHUA THAT IS BARABBAS or YESHUA THAT IS HAVING BEEN CALLED CHRISTOS?
Yeshua hoChristou - Son of the Theou - Torah Revolutionary - Love
Yeshua Bar-Abbas - Son of the Father - Sicarii Revolutionary - Murder[/size]