- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
1. & 2. Oh I see, so God calls forth every species of two by two animals from all over the global from every ecosystem on the earth into the ark, floods the whole earth in record time -- that is 40 days -- puts their habitats under water for a whole year and then sends them off two by two back to the wastelands they once called home?
In the aftermath, there would have been a global famine.
3. It was a large regional flood and many of the animals were no doubt Noah's personal livestock.
1. & 2. What - not enough water available for you?
http://www.theguardian.com/science/...underground-ocean-three-times-that-on-surface
What existing habitats, what wasteland? They had barely begun to spread on the earth at this time - which is why those fossils are found in such a limited area - remember? They didn't have all that far to go to get back to Noah. It's not our fault evolutionist's have misconstrued the physical evidence - even if the evidence tells you mankind's start was in one specific area - from which he spread outwards. They have misplaced it just a few miles southward, but they were close. But then the Bible had already told them the general area long before.
Why would there be a famine? Meat eaters certainly had all they could scrounge, lying all about. Same with clumps of vegetation for the veggies, and plus seeds are already in the ground - just waiting for the water to recede and light to start the process all over again. I can grow a lawn in a few weeks. Don't think all the worlds trees can feed things for a bit till that lawn is ready to be mowed?
3. Which goes against even their claims of mankind's beginning. Isn't this exactly what is claimed we see in evolution? Mankind spreading outwards from one region - and if you check, also the fossils of animals found with man?
In case all of you do not realize it yet - fossilization only occurs during catastrophes, when things are buried rapidly. Don't believe that? Then go find me some bones in the process of fossilization, from say anytime in the last 2,500 years?
Besides their flawed dating - the data exactly confirms the Bibles account. Those fossils of man are found only in a limited area. But, the strata they are found in (sedimentary layers) are found worldwide. Showing the true impossibility of it being confined to a local event. The other assertions are also void, being as man and those animals created with him had only begun to spread upon the earth. As confirmed by the data once again.
No one is objecting to the data - just man's interpretation of that data. Be that man - or woman - a Creationist or an Evolutionist.
EDIT:
If we believe the evolutionary story, mankind's descendant's stayed in one area for hundreds of thousands of years while evolving - and only in the last 12,000 began that outward spread. Mixed up the start - and are a little off on the dates - but otherwise, yes, I am certainly not objecting to any data - just flawed interpretations of it.
Such as people insisting that finches that interbreed and produce fertile offspring are separate species.
Last edited:
Upvote
0