1. adamah (#127)
Definition
ground, land
- ground (as general, tilled, yielding sustenance)
- piece of ground, a specific plot of land
- earth substance (for building or constructing)
- ground as earth's visible surface
Genesis passages that use the word adamah (through to the Tower of Babel):
Genesis 1:25; Genesis 2:7; Genesis 2:9; Genesis 2:19; Genesis 3:17; Genesis 3:19; Genesis 3:23; Genesis 4:3; Genesis 4:11-12; Genesis 4:14; Genesis 5:29; Genesis 6:1; Genesis 6:7; Genesis 6:20; Genesis 7:23; Genesis 8:13; Genesis 8:21; Genesis 9:2; Genesis 9:20;
http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/hebrew/kjv/adamah.html#
_____
2. erets (#776)
Definition
land, earth
- earth
- whole earth (as opposed to a part)
- earth (as opposed to heaven)
- earth (inhabitants)
- land
- country, territory
- district, region
- tribal territory
- piece of ground
- land of Canaan, Israel
- inhabitants of land
- Sheol, land without return, (under) world
- city (-state)
- ground, surface of the earth
- ground
- soil
- (in phrases)
- people of the land
- space or distance of country (in measurements of distance)
- level or plain country
- land of the living
- end(s) of the earth
- (almost wholly late in usage)
- lands, countries 1e
- often in contrast to Canaan
Genesis passages that use the word erets (through to the Tower of Babel):
Genesis 1:2; Genesis 1:10-12; Genesis 1:15; Genesis 1:20; Genesis 1:24-26; Genesis 1:28-30; Genesis 2:1; Genesis 2:4-6; Genesis 2:11-13; Genesis 4:14; Genesis 4:16; Genesis 6:4-6; Genesis 6:11-13; Genesis 6:17; Genesis 7:4; Genesis 7:12; Genesis 7:14; Genesis 7:17-19; Genesis 7:21; Genesis 7:23-24; Genesis 8:1; Genesis 8:3; Genesis 8:9; Genesis 8:13-14; Genesis 8:17; Genesis 8:19; Genesis 8:22; Genesis 9:2; Genesis 9:7; Genesis 9:10; Genesis 9:14; Genesis 9:19; Genesis 10:5; Genesis 10:10-11; Genesis 10:20; Genesis 10:25; Genesis 10:31-32; Genesis 11:1-2; Genesis 11:8-9;
http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/hebrew/kjv/erets.html
_____
3. tebel (#8398)
Definition
1. world
Genesis passages that use tebel (through to the Tower of Babel):
NONE! NONE! NONE! THE HEBREW WORD "TEBEL" ISN'T FOUND IN A SINGLE VERSE IN THE WHOLE BOOK OF GENESIS!
http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/hebrew/kjv/tebel-2.html
Now I have to ask what are these YEC global flood believers whining and crying about, how about trying to read all of these passages in the original Hebrew and get a clue.
The Mesopotamian Flood Plain:
Because those that believe in a young earth - follow the same incorrect translation you are insisting we do, while insisting they are following a wrong translation elsewhere.
Let's start by looking at the Hebrew word they translate as "was" in the second verse shall we?
"
Hayah"
http://biblehub.com/hebrew/1961.htm
"hayah: to fall out, come to pass, become, be"
To fall out - or come to pass - or to become - the earth must first exist in a flourishing state to fall out into a state of desolation and ruin must it not? It must exist in a state where there was light - to become darkened must it not?
If science wishes to claim it was a meteor that killed the dinosaurs and caused that darkness that enveloped the earth (what we like to refer to as similar to a nuclear winter condition) - I'll accept that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_event
Why you think one groups incorrect translation is wrong elsewhere, but don't argue their incorrect translation in another place confuses me? Especially when the very first incorrect translations helps clear up the other. But stop incorrectly translating the rest as well, just like the young earth believers are doing. Of course the Flood had nothing to do with the dinosaurs - they existed in that prior creation. There have been 6 creations and 5 destruction's. There's no need to pretend the scripture means anything other than what it says. As long as the correct translation is used.
It doesn't say the stars and moon and sun was created on the 4th day. It says they were then appointed to serve as markers of times and seasons - for planting and sowing - for religious services.
There is no conflict at all if one stops mistranslating the very second verse of the Scriptures, which leads them to incorrectly translate half a dozen others based upon pre-conceived ideas built upon an incorrect translation. You are simply disproving one sects incorrect translation as one evolutionary sects translation of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis) was disproved.
When translated correctly the belief in extinction events and the formation of all new forms of life afterwards fits hand in hand with the Scriptures and the evidence.
You just need to stop relying on that incorrect translation of the 2nd verse to try to prove someone else using an incorrect translation somewhere else disproves the Bible - when in reality it simply shows everyone is mistranslating it. I don't see you pointing out to them the incorrect translation in the second verse which leads to a correct translation of the age of the earth, and when the dinosaurs were destroyed. I see you accepting that same mistranslation - so you can prove them wrong somewhere else.
I expect they are wrong in both places - since only in that general area are fossils found in numbers that exist with the fossils of mankind. Those same animals found with fossils of man - are not found fossilized throughout the earth - just in that area. And neither are those fossils are found with dinosaurs - which are found worldwide. Clearly different times and eras, the destruction of one told of before the account of the creation of the next.
EDIT:
And we expect that after that nuclear winter - in which a comet or meteor vaporized a large portion of the waters it landed in (Yucatan Peninsula) light bringing heat would be required to penetrate the clouds causing evaporation and the waters above to be separated from the waters below. The consequence thereof is that dry land appeared. Not then created - merely inundated with water, fitting the observation that 75% of the surface is sedimentary rock.
So all of you believe that these plant eating creatures that survived these extinction events subsisted on what - if the plants and trees were not the first to recover and flourish? The seeds of which already existed in the ground?
No, I find very little at odds with what is observed when the whole Scripture is translated correctly.