So Adam and Eve could catch a cold, get a hold of a poisonous plant (touch poison ivy and get all itchy, for example)?
Interesting about your conclusions, if you could, could you please explain to me the difference between an "allegorical" belief in Genesis and the creation account and a literal one?
But You believe that a literal Adam and Eve and Garden of Eden existed 50-100 thousand years ago? Interesting? how did you reach your conclusions, please explain if you would, I would really like to hear more about your conclusions?
God Bless!
I dont want to derail the thread so ill be brief.
Yes they could, say, touch poison ivy, assuming it grew there. Keep in mind that they had direct fellowship with God, so I imagine God was guiding them through every step of life with perfect wisdom so I doubt calamity would have ever befallen them had they not acted in insubordination as they did.
As for allegorical readings of Genesis, look up "framework hypothesis" on wikipedia. That view is the closest to my own at this point.
Yes I believe in a literal Adam and Eve but I do not necessarily take the events described in Genesis 2-3 literally. The events convey theological truth in easily comprehended narrative, it need not be read as objective history in the details.
The snake and the trees, as well as Eve coming from Adams rib, may all be examples of figurative imagry intended to convey deeper spiritual concepts.
The idea of 50-100 thousand years ago is a consequence of the consensus of modern science that humanity is aproximately that old.
I arrived at my conclusions by recognizing that the God of the bible is in fact the God of the universe, and that these two revelations (properly understood) do not contradict. Reason and science are just as important as biblical scholarship in understanding God.
On top of that, when you begin to study the bible systematically with hermeneutic integrity absent circularly-reasoned presuppositions, you find that fundamentalist literalism is often times a rather poor framework for biblical exegesis.
An example of this is that the first few chapters of Genesis use obviously mythical language, lending to an allegorical rather than a literal reading.