Scenes like the one you linked are quite rare though.
How can we know that? Here are more instances:
Watch THIS:
Perhaps they're telling us something, eh?Because most times, things like this don't happen.
Animals are being watched a lot. A lot.
The fact that it's always big news to observe something like this, is evidence that it's not really common behaviour.
Perhaps they're telling us something, eh?
Suit yourself.Or perhaps (read: most likely) you are just reading things into it with an unhealthy dose of confirmation bias.
Suit yourself.
I'm not the one scratching my head over this.
Argument 1:
Animals seem to have feelings.
Therefore, animals really do have feelings.
Argument 2:
Animals seem to be intelligently designed.
Therefore, animals really are intelligently designed.
-----------------------
If you accept argument 1 but reject argument 2, I would like to know why.
Could I get an argument from someone educated enough to spell euphoria, happiness, and merit correctly? Thanks.Argument 1 makes testable predictions.
We can actually study animals and their psychology.
We can look at things like euforia, depression, anger, happyness in humans and compare this to behaviour we see in animals.
Argument 2 is just a statement with no merrit whatsoever.
Could I get an argument from someone educated enough to spell euphoria, happiness, and merit correctly? Thanks.
Argument 1:
Animals seem to have feelings.
Therefore, animals really do have feelings.
Argument 2:
Animals seem to be intelligently designed.
Therefore, animals really are intelligently designed.
-----------------------
If you accept argument 1 but reject argument 2, I would like to know why.
Intelligent design. Which part don't you understand?Ow, and how could I miss the absolute obvious....
I'll rephrase my answer and make it a bit more focused....
"Emotion" is something that can be properly defined in the field of psychology. Making it clear what exactly is meant by it.
The proponents of "intelligent design" however, especially on this site, refuse to (or simply can't) provide a proper definition of what "design" is and how it can be detected.
So the main difference between both arguments, I would say, is that one is properly defined while the other isn't.
Mammals pretty much have all the same hormones working in the brain. Only some mate for life and some do not.Anyone who has pets like cats and dogs knows that animals do have emotion, character, temper.
Could I get an argument from someone educated enough to spell euphoria, happiness, and merit correctly? Thanks.