- Mar 5, 2011
- 203
- 52
- 56
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
We all have someone in the bible that strikes a particular cord with us. Whether it be Moses, Abraham, Jacob, Noah, Peter and on and on etc...
I have two biblical characters that I especially relate to. The first will make perfect sense to you. The other, not so much. Might even raise an eybrow or two. I may or may not post both of these characters on one post. If however me wife calls me for supper I will post one now and one another time.(soon).
Now, my first character is the apostle Paul. For many this makes perfect sense. The reason for my affection for Paul however is not because he dominates the new testament. Not because he was Jesus champion converted from "church enemy" and violent persecuter. I relate to Paul because of his down to earth Humanity.
Let's face it. We all like the hero's of old. Noah, Moses, Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Job, David, and yes Jesus. Others like Solomon fail to reach my Hero funny bone. Now Paul is a classic hero. He was on fire for Christ. He dedicated his entire life and soul for the cause. He was forever a leader of men. He garnered respect even from his enemies. (read Acts 26) He died for his faith. However unlike the afore mentioned hero's of old, I could envision myself in Pauls shoes. This does not meen I think I am like him now, rather I feel his character is attainable. Let's face it. I can't see myself as a Moses or an Abraham. They just seem bigger than life. Paul however, portrays a human factor more recognizable to someone like myself.
As supper is almost ready I will forgo searching scriptures. Instead I will rely on case identification like so.
Do you remember when Paul chastised and put Peter in his place. Hold up here! Paul did what? Peter is the head of the church body. Jesus put him in the lead position and Paul had to straighten him out? Yes, infact he did. This may not sound like a revelation in humanity...Well just picture the conversation. Think about how it would have transpired. I don't think Peter stood there and took it with a big "yes sir" at he end. I emagine a little heat transpired.
Likewise, I imagine the fight between Barnabas and Paul over whether to take Mark on a missions trip was rather heated. Infact, Acts 15:39 says "it was such a sharp disagreement that they parted company." I have to say, I find fault in Pauls unwillingness to give a fellow follower a second chance. Barnabas did.
There has been other mentions of Pauls temper. Now why do I find that a redeaming quality? The anwer is, I don't. However as one who has a temper I find it a quality I can relate to. 2Cor 12:7 says that he was given a thorn in his flesh. We do not know what the thorn is but I am positive it is a sin of some kind. Others have surmised that it is his failing eye sight. I reject this theory on the bases that when he prayed for its removal the Lord said, "My grace is sufficient for you". You do not need grace for poor eyesight. Grace is an undeserved pardon and a pardon is not needed for such a thing. I also feel, the reason the thorn is not identified is so that we (you and me) could substitute our own individual sins in its stead. His weakness gives him a more humane feel and yet there is no denying that Paul was a hero. Right up to his death. He ran the good race 2Tim. 4:7-8, His reward is asured. I love this guy cause if he can do it, I can. It's obvious God can overlook every sin. Even when the sin is not recognized in ourselves. Paul, I am sure, did not recognize his unforgiving attitude when confronting Barnabas and Mark. And yes, God probably hadn't intended Mark or Barnabas accompany Paul that trip. Using our sin for His own end is something our wonderful God is very adept at.
Yes, supper is ready. Later I will tell you why I relate sooo strongly to Esau, brother of Jacob. Father of the Caananites.
God Bless...MIKE
I have two biblical characters that I especially relate to. The first will make perfect sense to you. The other, not so much. Might even raise an eybrow or two. I may or may not post both of these characters on one post. If however me wife calls me for supper I will post one now and one another time.(soon).
Now, my first character is the apostle Paul. For many this makes perfect sense. The reason for my affection for Paul however is not because he dominates the new testament. Not because he was Jesus champion converted from "church enemy" and violent persecuter. I relate to Paul because of his down to earth Humanity.
Let's face it. We all like the hero's of old. Noah, Moses, Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Job, David, and yes Jesus. Others like Solomon fail to reach my Hero funny bone. Now Paul is a classic hero. He was on fire for Christ. He dedicated his entire life and soul for the cause. He was forever a leader of men. He garnered respect even from his enemies. (read Acts 26) He died for his faith. However unlike the afore mentioned hero's of old, I could envision myself in Pauls shoes. This does not meen I think I am like him now, rather I feel his character is attainable. Let's face it. I can't see myself as a Moses or an Abraham. They just seem bigger than life. Paul however, portrays a human factor more recognizable to someone like myself.
As supper is almost ready I will forgo searching scriptures. Instead I will rely on case identification like so.
Do you remember when Paul chastised and put Peter in his place. Hold up here! Paul did what? Peter is the head of the church body. Jesus put him in the lead position and Paul had to straighten him out? Yes, infact he did. This may not sound like a revelation in humanity...Well just picture the conversation. Think about how it would have transpired. I don't think Peter stood there and took it with a big "yes sir" at he end. I emagine a little heat transpired.
Likewise, I imagine the fight between Barnabas and Paul over whether to take Mark on a missions trip was rather heated. Infact, Acts 15:39 says "it was such a sharp disagreement that they parted company." I have to say, I find fault in Pauls unwillingness to give a fellow follower a second chance. Barnabas did.
There has been other mentions of Pauls temper. Now why do I find that a redeaming quality? The anwer is, I don't. However as one who has a temper I find it a quality I can relate to. 2Cor 12:7 says that he was given a thorn in his flesh. We do not know what the thorn is but I am positive it is a sin of some kind. Others have surmised that it is his failing eye sight. I reject this theory on the bases that when he prayed for its removal the Lord said, "My grace is sufficient for you". You do not need grace for poor eyesight. Grace is an undeserved pardon and a pardon is not needed for such a thing. I also feel, the reason the thorn is not identified is so that we (you and me) could substitute our own individual sins in its stead. His weakness gives him a more humane feel and yet there is no denying that Paul was a hero. Right up to his death. He ran the good race 2Tim. 4:7-8, His reward is asured. I love this guy cause if he can do it, I can. It's obvious God can overlook every sin. Even when the sin is not recognized in ourselves. Paul, I am sure, did not recognize his unforgiving attitude when confronting Barnabas and Mark. And yes, God probably hadn't intended Mark or Barnabas accompany Paul that trip. Using our sin for His own end is something our wonderful God is very adept at.
Yes, supper is ready. Later I will tell you why I relate sooo strongly to Esau, brother of Jacob. Father of the Caananites.
God Bless...MIKE