Let's say two people worship Moog.
One worships Moog on Wednesday, the other on Tuesday.
One worships Moog by occasionally speaking in one liturgical/sacred language, the other worships Moog by occasionalyl speaking in a different one.
One eats octopus, the other considers eating octopus a sin.
One keeps one calendar, the other keeps another calendar.
Hence one keeps one set of holidays, the other keeps another set of holidays.
One performs baptism to infants, the other circumcises infants.
One considers Moog to be a triune Moog, the other worships an undivided/unitarian Moog.
Saying they both worship Moog and that it is logical for them to have religious unity is ridiculous. They both have a completely different concept of how Moog is to - IN PRACTICE, not just in theory - be worshipped.
One worships Moog on Wednesday, the other on Tuesday.
One worships Moog by occasionally speaking in one liturgical/sacred language, the other worships Moog by occasionalyl speaking in a different one.
One eats octopus, the other considers eating octopus a sin.
One keeps one calendar, the other keeps another calendar.
Hence one keeps one set of holidays, the other keeps another set of holidays.
One performs baptism to infants, the other circumcises infants.
One considers Moog to be a triune Moog, the other worships an undivided/unitarian Moog.
Saying they both worship Moog and that it is logical for them to have religious unity is ridiculous. They both have a completely different concept of how Moog is to - IN PRACTICE, not just in theory - be worshipped.
Upvote
0