Open Heart
Well-Known Member
- Aug 3, 2014
- 18,521
- 4,393
- 62
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Celibate
Quite true.Civil marriage has nothing on "holy matrimony".
Upvote
0
Quite true.Civil marriage has nothing on "holy matrimony".
It would take the government stamp of approval off of the unions. They no longer teach tolerance of homosexuals and cross-dressers in school today (live and let live). They teach acceptance of them as normal lifestyles, which they are certainly not.
Nope ...their 3 relics are still there for them to accept if they submit and knell before the Roman High Priest for the "Title." Also their orders of knighthood are still very strong within the Roman State Church, and are also replicated within the powers of "secular" government in the Scottish Rite.Heraldic Language.
I Thought the Silver Falcon caused the split in the Black Double headed phoenix?
Pretty sure the coat of arms has been established already.
Who cares what some atheists in the governments approve of ?
Apropos that: they don't approve of Torah, so should I picket the government buildings until they start keeping Shabbat ?
Since (A) the legal status of SS marriage makes no difference one way or the other in this ungodly world, and since (B) it is already impossible to reverse it, I don't see the point of fighting it.
Even if we managed to make it illegal, so what ?
They would still be homosexuals, practicing homosexuality. The legal status of it makes no actual, physical, real, tangible difference.
Then you give up and may as well never leave your home. That is not why we were called. Them is us.
I certainly have no idea what any of this heraldic language, silver falcons, and black double headed phoenixes are all about. Would you like to explain to me what all this mysterious mumbo jumbo refers to? thanks.Heraldic Language.
I Thought the Silver Falcon caused the split in the Black Double headed phoenix?
Pretty sure the coat of arms has been established already.
Simply a Lineage. Titles for the ruling class in History. A family Crest. The Name is carried down from the Fathers. Rome conquered the British Isles and so forth and set up ruling states and set up families as lords and so on. Religion was part of the state system. History, family tree and so on. Alot of reading.I certainly have no idea what any of this heraldic language, silver falcons, and black double headed phoenixes are all about. Would you like to explain to me what all this mysterious mumbo jumbo refers to? thanks.
I don't remember Rome conquering England. It tried. It got so far as Hadrian's wall. But ultimately it gave up and went home.Simply a Lineage. Titles for the ruling class in History. A family Crest. The Name is carried down from the Fathers. Rome conquered the British Isles and so forth and set up ruling states and set up families as lords and so on. Religion was part of the state system. History, family tree and so on. Alot of reading.
The rest is conjecture.
I venture to guess. Starting with Rome as the Beast. And that from one of its Lineage the Antichrist will come.
I don't see how you reached that conclusion. IF you want me to understand how you reached that conclusion, you're going to have to put it into words. You didn't even make clear what part of my post, if any, you were adressing.
"Since (A) the legal status of SS marriage makes no difference one way or the other in this ungodly world, and since (B) it is already impossible to reverse it, I don't see the point of fighting it."
The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, the highest law in the land. In order to overrule the Supreme Court, it would literally take a Constitutional Amendment, which is next to impossible. Various other ideas for amendments have been floating around in recent decades, all to no avail. It would take the ratification of 38 states to pass any amendment.Everything we do makes a difference, and nothing is impossible to Yahweh. The states and Congress can overrule the courts. All it takes is enough guts and people backing them.
The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, the highest law in the land. In order to overrule the Supreme Court, it would literally take a Constitutional Amendment, which is next to impossible. Various other ideas for amendments have been floating around in recent decades, all to no avail. It would take the ratification of 38 states to pass any amendment.
Sometimes God simply gives you the grace to live within a heathen state.
This is unlawful. There is no such thing as a law passed that the SC cannot review to see if it is constitutional. And for states to refuse to comply with the Supreme Court ruling? That would be anarchy--a state considerably worse than having same sex marriages.All it takes is either Congress passing a "one man one woman" marriage law that states "this is non-reviewable by the SC" or if many states refuse to implement the law.
Theoretically, I guess. Has it ever actually happened that the Supreme Court has reversed itself?Failing that, if one or more justices could be replaced with more conservative judges, the SC itself can overturn the decision.
This is unlawful. There is no such thing as a law passed that the SC cannot review to see if it is constitutional. And for states to refuse to comply with the Supreme Court ruling? That would be anarchy--a state considerably worse than having same sex marriages.
While I don't support homosexuality or homosexual marriage, I am a realist. My assessment is that preventing homosexuals from marrying is probably not possible at this point in the Western world.
And the thing is, even IF one could prevent homosexuals from marrying - what would that even accomplish ?
They would still be homosexuals. They would still be practicing homosexuality.
Everything we do makes a difference, and nothing is impossible to Yahweh. The states and Congress can overrule the courts. All it takes is enough guts and people backing them.
This is unlawful. There is no such thing as a law passed that the SC cannot review to see if it is constitutional. And for states to refuse to comply with the Supreme Court ruling? That would be anarchy--a state considerably worse than having same sex marriages.
Theoretically, I guess. Has it ever actually happened that the Supreme Court has reversed itself?
At this point it would take a constitutional amendment and that is not going to happen with the number of democrat seats in the senate. States CAN NOT over ride a SCOTUS decision.
How exactly would you suggest people ignore same sex marriage or abortion legislation? Other than not having one?How do you think segregation was ended? People defied the law and they protested the law. Too many people to lock up and too many to ignore. If only they had applied such effort to ending abortion, that could have been stopped before millions of babies died.