http://www.crossroad.to/Bible_studies/Message.html
"The Message DELETES the reference to God's holy name, ADDS requests not voiced by Jesus, and changes the meaning of other verses.
What does Eugene Peterson himself say? In his introduction to The Message, he tells us that "This version of the New Testament in a contemporary idiom keeps the language of the Message and fresh and understandable in the same language in which we do our shopping, talk with our friends, worry about world affairs, and teach our children their table manners...."
This sounds like a good idea, but what if essential Biblical concepts are not part of our everyday conversation? Should we then rewrite God's holy Scriptures to fit today's more shallow and worldly communications?
Remember, we are dealing with God's holy unchangeable Word - not an ordinary book. God owns His message, we don't. Only His own, well-guarded words can be presented as absolute truth. Yet, readers who trust NavPress and the endorsement of Christian leaders such Warren Wiersbe and J. I. Packer view this book as an authentic translation of the Bible rather than as Peterson's personal, politically correct interpretation."
What Peterson is talking about is the Dialectic Language: Diaprax - the Humanism Language. It's a brainwashing Language, which most of the world and the church has become brainwashed in, because they had no love of The Tuth. No wonder Peterson came on the scene to do ~his bible~ to push on toward the TRANSFORMATION CHANGE to A GLOBAL SOCIEY. For behold, it's here! The world and the world in the church, wanted Satan - well now they have Him.
"The Message DELETES the reference to God's holy name, ADDS requests not voiced by Jesus, and changes the meaning of other verses.
What does Eugene Peterson himself say? In his introduction to The Message, he tells us that "This version of the New Testament in a contemporary idiom keeps the language of the Message and fresh and understandable in the same language in which we do our shopping, talk with our friends, worry about world affairs, and teach our children their table manners...."
This sounds like a good idea, but what if essential Biblical concepts are not part of our everyday conversation? Should we then rewrite God's holy Scriptures to fit today's more shallow and worldly communications?
Remember, we are dealing with God's holy unchangeable Word - not an ordinary book. God owns His message, we don't. Only His own, well-guarded words can be presented as absolute truth. Yet, readers who trust NavPress and the endorsement of Christian leaders such Warren Wiersbe and J. I. Packer view this book as an authentic translation of the Bible rather than as Peterson's personal, politically correct interpretation."
What Peterson is talking about is the Dialectic Language: Diaprax - the Humanism Language. It's a brainwashing Language, which most of the world and the church has become brainwashed in, because they had no love of The Tuth. No wonder Peterson came on the scene to do ~his bible~ to push on toward the TRANSFORMATION CHANGE to A GLOBAL SOCIEY. For behold, it's here! The world and the world in the church, wanted Satan - well now they have Him.
Last edited: