Weatherman Says Katrina Was Made By Mob.

Quantos

Sock ? What Sock
Mar 6, 2005
7,619
5,825
Earth for now
✟33,990.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Chrysalis Kat said:
Meow!
Now here's something I bet no one could make up. No one except... Pat Robertson.
Did you know that the real reason for Katrina was due to Ellen Degeneres and her hosting the Emmys? Now, before you think this isn't true, hear him out.
Pat Robertson announce on Sunday 9-11-05 that Hurricane Katrina was God’s way of expressing its anger at the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences for its selection of Ellen Degeneres to host this year’s Emmy Awards. “By choosing an avowed lesbian for this national event, these Hollywood elites have clearly invited God’s wrath,” Robertson said on “The 700 Club” on Sunday. “Is it any surprise that the Almighty chose to strike at Miss Degeneres ’hometown?” Robertson also noted that the last time Degeneres hosted the Emmys, in 2001, the September 11 terrorism attacks took place shortly before the ceremony.

Now tell me, who in their right mind can argue with logic like this? Nobody could make this up so it must be true.
[font=Verdana, Arial]
LINK
[/font]

Already been debunked in another thread :D

But maby the dubunking is phony ???
 
Upvote 0

Chrysalis Kat

Gettin' Riggy With It
Nov 25, 2004
4,045
312
TEXAS
✟20,887.00
Faith
Politics
US-Democrat
Quantos said:
Already been debunked in another thread :D
Why I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you.
theyareontome.gif

But maybe the dubunking is phony ???
That's the ticket!!!
 
Upvote 0

philosopherthales

Active Member
Oct 30, 2004
340
20
✟583.00
Faith
Deist
Why don't you guys believe in weather control?

examples
-atomic bomb set off at night creates a day-time like atmosphere and higher temperatures in the area
-global warming is mans effects on the environment. Some people blame global warming on more severe and numerous hurricanes.

here go to this website:
http://cloudseeding.dri.edu/Links.html
it is an .edu site so don't worry.


those are some interesting organizations

As for HAARP, I don't know. HAARP is some really powerful equipment though.

A high power transmitter and antenna array operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. When complete, the transmitter will be capable of producing up to 3.6 million Watts to an antenna system consisting of 180 crossed dipole antennas arranged as a rectangular, planar array.
www.haarp.alaska.edu

Hmmm...no scientist here so I don't know what that means or what effects that could have.

To give you a comparison of how much power 3.6 million watts is. That is 17 times the average power consumption rate of the country of Montserrat(population around 10,000)
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/mh.html
 
Upvote 0

philosopherthales

Active Member
Oct 30, 2004
340
20
✟583.00
Faith
Deist
The illuminati is probably behind the hurricanes. They are designed to bring america to its knees and fulfill the plans of the bilderberg globalist elite to turn america into a third world country/have europe become the world power.

first the hurricanes, then comes a new attack on america, then comes the big california earthquake.
hmmm...okkkk

Well, atleast earthquake creation would be theoretically easier than natural disaster(weather type) control IMO.

tunneling equipment
art02.jpg


plus

nuclear weapon:
nuclear-bomb-3in.jpg


on a fault line

gal_tectonic%20plates.jpg


equals:
earthquake%20photo4.jpg


You don't even have to design new technology besides underground guidance.

The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Tsar Bomba, which had a yield of 50 megatons of TNT (210 PJ). The most powerful nuclear weapon ever produced was a version of the Tsar Bomb that would have yielded some 100 megatons of TNT.

The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake released an estimated 2 × 1018 joules (2 EJ), or "475,000 kilotons (475 megatons) of TNT, or the equivalent of 23,000 Nagasaki bombs." (USGS)

hmmm, there can be a comparision of power here. I think it is completely possible for an earthquake to be started by human intervention. 5 of these 'Tsar' bombs has the same power as one of the most powerful earthquakes in recorded history.
 
Upvote 0

saami

Well-Known Member
Jul 5, 2005
1,468
64
✟9,442.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Chrysalis Kat said:
Meow!
Now here's something I bet no one could make up. No one except... Pat Robertson.
Did you know that the real reason for Katrina was due to Ellen Degeneres and her hosting the Emmys? Now, before you think this isn't true, hear him out.
Pat Robertson announce on Sunday 9-11-05 that Hurricane Katrina was God’s way of expressing its anger at the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences for its selection of Ellen Degeneres to host this year’s Emmy Awards. “By choosing an avowed lesbian for this national event, these Hollywood elites have clearly invited God’s wrath,” Robertson said on “The 700 Club” on Sunday. “Is it any surprise that the Almighty chose to strike at Miss Degeneres ’hometown?” Robertson also noted that the last time Degeneres hosted the Emmys, in 2001, the September 11 terrorism attacks took place shortly before the ceremony.

Now tell me, who in their right mind can argue with logic like this? Nobody could make this up so it must be true.
[font=Verdana, Arial]
LINK
[/font]

Watch out Pope Benedict! The sistine chapel - the work of that gay artist Michaelangelo is next!
 
Upvote 0

Harpuia

Oldie... very very oldie...
Nov 9, 2004
14,888
914
37
Undisclosed
✟27,603.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Others
BeautyForAshes said:
^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

Well apparently they are not fans of "chopped and screwed" rap either because Rita is headed for Houston now

Either that or they just absolutely can't stand that Joel Osteen character. :p

Oh, and country music... brrr...

And the Houston Texans, will they ever get a winning record?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

simplicity

incredibly ordinary member
Jun 29, 2002
2,610
128
57
Toronto
Visit site
✟3,507.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I feel it is possible to cause hurricanes under the right conditions. I don't think anybody has this ability - particularly not the mob. Those guys might be, er, entreprenuers. But they probably don't know much about influencing convective currents and creating recursive exponential patterns from ambient kinetic energy.

I personally believe however that angels know how and are able to create and stop hurricanes. I feel the vast majority of the minds in the world are overly narrow-minded and short-sighted to venture down that path.
 
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
12,397
3,703
70
Franklin, Tennessee
✟220,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
philosopherthales said:
Why don't you guys believe in weather control?
Because it doesn't work, for starters.

To give you a comparison of how much power 3.6 million watts is. That is 17 times the average power consumption rate of the country of Montserrat(population around 10,000)
HCJB, a Christian shortwave broadcaster in Quito, Ecuador had a trick antenna that they designed that produced something like 21 dB gain. (It had big teardrop-shaped radiators in front of what looked like the world's biggest Sterba curtain; truly awesome.)That meant that when they fed it off a 150 kW transmitter (and they had a few of those sitting around) they got an ERP of about 19.2 megawatts. Of course they weren't beaming the stuff straight up like HAARP is doing, but they were sure bouncing all the signal you could stand off the ionosphere. You could pick up their 15 meter broadcasts on the fillings in your teeth.

Don't be skeered of radios. Radios are our friends.

73 es cul
 
Upvote 0

philosopherthales

Active Member
Oct 30, 2004
340
20
✟583.00
Faith
Deist
Why don't you guys believe in weather control?


Because it doesn't work, for starters.

ehem....

cloud seeding

cloud seeding is defined by wikipedians as:

Cloud seeding is the attempt to change the amount or type of precipitation that falls out of clouds or the structure of clouds by dispersing substances into the air which allow water droplets or ice crystals to form more easily. The most common chemicals used for cloud seeding include silver iodide and dry ice (frozen carbon dioxide).

At encyclopedia.com, they say the following under 'rainmaking'

On this basis the American physical chemist Irving Langmuir and his associates carried on Project Cirrus from 1940 to 1952 to find ways to produce rain. Three methods resulted, including spraying water into warm clouds; dropping dry ice into cold clouds, where the dry ice freezes some water into ice crystals that act as natural nuclei for snow; and wafting silver iodide crystals or other similar crystals into a cold cloud from the ground or from an airplane over the cloud, with the crystals hastening the freezing of supercooled water between 27°F (-2.8°C) and 5°F. Overseeding can dissipate a cloud. These techniques are only moderately successful; they cannot be relied upon in case of drought.

So, you can create rain, or you can over-seed and dissipate a cloud. Notice the note at the ends that it was moderately successful, but can't work on the fly. You need some preconditions for it to work successfully.

Encarta, says the following:

One method of weather modification is to seed clouds with tiny particles to try to coax more precipitation from them. There are two primary ways to seed clouds. The first method uses the coalescence process of rain formation. Small water drops or other particles are injected into the base of a cloud.

The second method of seeding clouds employs the ice-crystal (Bergeron) process of rain formation. Small particles of silver iodide (AgI) are injected into a cloud that contains both ice crystals and water droplets at below freezing temperatures.

They also note that:

The effectiveness of these methods of cloud seeding is disputed because it is difficult to determine how much precipitation would have fallen had the cloud not been seeded. Some studies indicate that seeding under optimum conditions will enhance precipitation by as much as 15 percent. On the other hand,some attempts to seed clouds have reduced the amount of precipitation.

There is some contradictory stuff here, but to say it doesn't work as a scientific fact is ludicrous. You got some results that modified precipitation to increase rainfall and some to decrease rainfall. Although it wasn't predictable at the time, it had effects caused by whom? Man-made? or natural? Man-made. When weather results are modified by human it is called what? Artificial weather or weather control or weather modification..take your pick.

Hail suppression:

The idea is that you over seed a cloud so that there are a lot of nuclei for rain drops. This reduces the size of any hail as the water quantity is divided into smaller units by distribution to a greater quantity of rain drop nuclei.

Fog Dispersal:


Encarta:

First they try to burn fuel around airports to get rid of fog in the area. Combustion emits energy which heats the atmosphere and water is no longer in the right conditions. This didn't work too well.

Another method employs helicopters that hover above the fog layer. The turbulence created by the blades mixes the drier, warmer air above the fog with the cooler, saturated air below. The mixing of the drier air into the fog evaporates the fog. This method works well when the fog is shallow, winds are light, and the air temperature is above freezing.

Seeding can also get rid of fog. Seeding causes condensation which will get rid of water vapor refracting and blocking light.

Hurricane reduction:

Encarta:

Hurricanes have been seeded with silver iodide in an attempt to reduce their destructive winds. During the 1960s, project STORMFURY, a joint effort of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the United States Navy, seeded several hurricanes just outside their centers so that clouds would develop farther away from the main area of severe thunderstorms and high winds. The hope was that this would reduce the air pressure locally and thereby reduce the hurricane’s winds. Although some of the results were encouraging, some uncertainty remains as to the effectiveness of seeding hurricanes.


Personally, it is my opinion that weather control is possible, yet improbable at this point.

Don't be skeered of radios. Radios are our friends.


yep, they are. When did you get the idea that I was scared of radios though?
 
Upvote 0