But, as I've said, your clarification wasn't clear.
Which is why I asked to be explicit. Which you didn't do, for some reason.
It would be easier, if you would just answer the question:
1. "why" in the sense of mechanism / process
or
2. "why" in the sense reason, purpose, intention
Even if all of the right variables had allowed for a perfect, inhabitable planet, why would life form?
See, again, I see ambuigity in the formulation of this question.
Your insistence on the word "why", is confusing.
Are you asking about what are the causal factors that lead to the formation of life? Are you asking about the process by which that happens?
Or are you asking a different "why" question?
The second important question of General Biology: “How and why would life form in the universe?”
See, this is the reason why it continues to be confusing.
Now, you literally are asking BOTH the "how" and "why"?
This leads me to conclude that you indeed mean "why" in the sense of reason, purpose or intentention.
Assuming that is the case, then at this point I'm going to ask you how you determined that to be a valid question?
Because, off course, it's a loaded question. By asking what the purpose is of something, you are assuming / implying that there even is a purpose to begin with.
What is the scientific reason life exists, or what scientific laws have "pushed" life into existence, on this one planet?
This is better.
My answer is that I don't know. Science is working on trying to solve that puzzle.
Seeing as how life is fundamentally chemistry, I'ld assume the answer is some chemical process.
Scientifically speaking, What is the Purpose of Life?
Scientifically speaking, why do you beat your wife?
Why would life form from non-living matter?
For what reason might it form?
It seems to have infinite complexity and amazing adaptability.
What is pushing for that to happen?
Why does it fight against all efforts to kill it?
What is motivating life to keep on, keeping on?
How did you determine that there is a purpose or reason, to begin with?
It's like asking "what is the purpose of ice?" or "what is the purpose of a mountain"? Or "what does purple taste like"?
It's an invalid question.
Ice is the result of water + freezing temperature.
Mountains are the result of tectonic activity.
The "why" question, is not a sensible question.
We can ask about what the chain of events was that lead to the formation of mountains. That's a sensible question.
Given that mountains exist, we can also ask about how their presence affects weather patters. That's also a sensible question.
Asking about the "purpose" of mountains, is not a sensible question.