no. At worst, we had the information available to us that could have been used to prevent the attacks and we didn't put the pieces together or didn't take it seriously and people in charge played "cover your ass".
What is the motive? Who inside our government conspired to make this happen, and how would they benefit?Of course 911 was an inside job. Anybody who thinks otherwise either hasn't done enough research or is far too trusting of government.
For one thing its been conclusively proven that the box cutter story was a lie, as the only cell phone call that claimed the hijackers were using box cutters was impossible. No air phones on that plane.
Of course 911 was an inside job. Anybody who thinks otherwise either hasn't done enough research or is far too trusting of government.
For one thing its been conclusively proven that the box cutter story was a lie, as the only cell phone call that claimed the hijackers were using box cutters was impossible. No air phones on that plane.
How am I supposed to know the motive?What is the motive? Who inside our government conspired to make this happen, and how would they benefit?
How am I supposed to know the motive?
I can speculate if you like. My guess is they wanted a reason to go to war in the middle east for some reason.
Oh,I get it. You think if I don't have all the answers that therefore I must be wrong.
That it wasn't is a tinfoil hatter conspiracy theory.
I don't expect you to have all the answers, but I at least expect you to be able to establish the three aspects of a crime that must be established before guilt can be determined. So far I've only asked you to establish one aspect.How am I supposed to know the motive?
I can speculate if you like. My guess is they wanted a reason to go to war in the middle east for some reason.
Oh,I get it. You think if I don't have all the answers that therefore I must be wrong.