pgp_protector
Noted strange person
- Dec 17, 2003
- 51,715
- 17,633
- 55
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Maybe not fake, but definitely heavily biased.Ok.
If I have this correctly, CNN is fake.
Is John McCain fake?
Is Lindsey Graham fake?
Is the Washington Post fake?
Is MI6 fake?
Is Orbis Business Intelligence fake?
Is The Guardian fake?
Is the NY Times fake?
Is the CIA fake?
Is the FBI fake?
Is Trump's continual support for Putin fake?
Is Trump's Secretary of State appointment having a $5 billion oil deal with the Russians a fake?
Ever put together a jig-saw puzzle? If you do it right, you find that all the pieces end up fitting together.
I agree! They made fun of his hair, how he eats (how he eats his chicken was literally a breaking news story), and on and on. Every little detail. They attack his daughter for her business ventures (and on a plane). They're showing very little class, then act like they have the moral high ground and they don't.Because he won. Since he won they need to attack him every second of the day so they feel better about Hillary not winning. I'm sure they will continue to do so every day until the next election. Its what sore losers do.
If I recall a few days after he won they attacked him for eating a burger. Then they attacked his daughter for wearing her own line of jewelry somewhere. Its crazy.
I know people have freedom of speech of course but there should be a line between freedom of speech and just attacking relentlessly because your mad. If I ran the country I'd call those who need to attack him 24/7 traitors to the country since they are indeed attacking the president. What I would do about it I don't know. Maybe send them to Canada since many said thats what they would do to begin with.
Someone should talk to CNN about not being appropriate.Similarly to what? An emotionally impaired child? Shouting at people and calling them names isn't really appropriate for a grown-up.
Trump's response was similarly appropriate.
Maybe not fake, but definitely heavily biased.
The answer is the imbalance of power. When you sign on to the office of the Presidency you are clearly obliged not to attack fellow citizens even if they unfairly attack you. That may not seem fair, but neither is the fact that Mr. Trump wields so much power.What I don't understand is why people are overwhelmingly allowed to attack Trump for EVERY LITTLE THING he does or says, but if he says ANYTHING back to them, he's a horrible person.
I agree! They made fun of his hair, how he eats (how he eats his chicken was literally a breaking news story), and on and on. Every little detail. They attack his daughter for her business ventures (and on a plane). They're showing very little class, then act like they have the moral high ground and they don't.
Ah I see your point. When someone else does wrong, do wrong back. Two wrongs equal a right. Drop below their level. Be even more immature. Now it all makes sense!!!Ummm. You are in the process of farewelling a president who has acted with class and dignity throughout his 8 years. And yet, he and his family had to withstand him being portrayed with a bone through his nose. He had to endure years of this incoming president leading a campaign to deny him his birthright. The same 'man' was part of an ugly smear to declare him a 'secret Muslim'. His wife has been called an 'ape'.
And you get all hot and bothered about people criticising Trump's hairstyle, which he has made fun of himself!?
Please!
Really? That is why Mr. Trump won?Again this is why you lost. If your going to act like babies because you believe two wrongs equal a right, then of course people are going to to vote for the other person because they will agree two wrongs make a right.
I don't dispute this. Nor do I dispute that people had all sorts of reasons to see Hillary as flawed.Well many outside of big cities said they voted for him because the left just ignored them over and over and only cared about city votes.
Ah I see your point. When someone else does wrong, do wrong back.
Two wrongs equal a right. Drop below their level. Be even more immature. Now it all makes sense!!!
Again this is why you lost.
If your going to act like babies
because you believe two wrongs equal a right, then of course people are going to to vote for the other person because they will agree two wrongs make a right.
Me? Was I thrilled Obama won (twice none the less)? Of course not. But I got over it because thats what a person, an adult, does. This is where we get into the whole millenials need trophys to feel better thing. And its true. Millenials on both sides I have noticed take loss pretty badly.
Well for me it was simple. Both are evil. But Trump is less evil by like 0.00001%. lol. That and at least with Hillary we knows shes for things that are unbiblical. I mean I didn't want to vote Trump either but my only other choice was throw away my vote on someone who wouldn't win. Heck, I would have voted Bernie over Trump or Hillary.I don't dispute this. Nor do I dispute that people had all sorts of reasons to see Hillary as flawed.
However, try as I might, I cannot imagine how a person with what I would call sound judgment would vote for Mr. Trump.
Yes, Ms. Clinton was a flawed candidate. But Donald Trump? Please.
Well in that case I apologize if I read it wrong.Then you haven't seen my point, because I said no such thing. What I did say was that Trump being teased about his hair is trivial, if for no other reason than he has made fun of it himself!
Well my statement was just a general statement. Not pointed at you really.I was born in 1953. What do "millenials" have to do with my comments?
What I don't understand is why people are overwhelmingly allowed to attack Trump for EVERY LITTLE THING he does or says, but if he says ANYTHING back to them, he's a horrible person.
For example, the gold star family during the Democratic Convention. Trump didn't NOTHING to that family. He wasn't responsible for their son dying. They get up on stage and trash Trump, but he can't respond. If he does, he's 'attacking a gold star family'.
This sort of conduct isn't right. Trump shouldn't be getting in feuds with random news outlets, no matter how poorly sourced. The media should just give up on bashing Trump for a moment and give him a chance to do some things before they criticize him more.
That said, I'm glad he's responding the way he is. I am so sick and tired of the left bashing every right-leaning person and finding dirt from nowhere, meanwhile being as kind to left-leaning people as possible. I'm tried of the liberal media bias which was so nakedly obvious during the election. I don't care how much of Trump's shenanigans are true--I just want someone to make the media fair and objective.
I don't disagree that people tend to dogpile on him, but a big part of leadership in any capacity is being able to maintain your composure while receiving criticism, particularly from below you or from outside the organization. What kind of general would publicly humiliate a private or corporal? Petty fights over things that don't matter should be beneath someone of Trump's position, but his ego is too fragile to let any of these things go.
Really? THAT'S your example? He threatened to ban all Muslims from entering the country. The Khan's, rightly, got angry for a number of reasons and pointed out that their Muslim son gave his life serving in our military. Trump responded by suggesting that the mother's on-stage silence was due to some sexist religious rules. He did attack them and he should've lost the election over it. Between that and his comments on McCain, it's amazing the military folks didn't crucify him. I guess authoritarianism trumps (no pun intended) loyalty and respect.