- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,279
- 8,500
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The problem I have with most creation-science literature is that I find it promoted by individuals who do not have sufficient credentials in either science or theology, along with the fact bogus degrees are also often presented.
How would a sufficient credential impact what they say?
That's like saying your doctors diagnosis is correct
even though you know it's not correct, yet you have
zero medical training. So you get a second opinion
which is rarely the same as the first.Most everyone has
gone through this process a number of times.
Last edited:
Upvote
0