Learning to accept the disunity of the MJ community, and finding positive aspects to individualism.
This thread is about my personal attempt to come to terms with and explain (recasting positively) various MJ problems.
I have divided this into three sections, where I share my meditations on and attempts at finding perspectival solutions to what I see as problems plagueing and discrediting MJ in my personal estimation.
The first section creates the groundwork for the subsequent lines of thought.
In the second section I pick up the thread from the first section and I meditate over the fact that many people in the MJ community strongly oppose to any call to unity, which is also a problem, since it lacks perspective.
The third section is an attempt at reframing something negative in a postive perspective.
1 - FINDING RICHNESS OF EXPRESSION IN THE DISUNITY
There is unity and disunity. Both have a rich variant and a poor variant.
Our goal should be rich unity, but since that is not realistic goal right now, the goal of the individual adherent of MJ should be a rich individualism, a rich form of disunity.
By rich I mean to denote something both spiritually vibrant/vivacuous, but also diverse in a positive sense. By poor I mean to denote something less or not spiritually vibrant/vivacious, but also something not or less diverse.
2 - A CALL TO WIDENING PERSPECTIVE
Disunity can be bad, but also leads into Individualism.
Individualism leads to personal expression.
Personal expression leads to diversity.
Diversity leads to richness.
So while disunity can have many obvious negative effects, even becoming an existential threat to the affected entity/group, it can also have positive side-effects to be expressed in this present epoch prior to "the end."
I see many people who are very invested in the individualist conceptuality, who seem to think that disunity is a necessity, and that it is essentially good. I think disunity/individualism is not a necessity, and there are MANY examples from the past where divisiveness and individualism have been great sins, causing great harm to God's people and his religion. I think disunity is not essentially good, but rather something that can have both good and bad effects. It is, to be honest, extreme foolishness to view disunity as a necessity or as something that is only good. That leads into solipsism, that leads into elevating yourself, or simply put, arrogance. The same sin that traditionally led to the fall of the Satan. But that's beside the point.
The point is that while we can accept that the current epoch requires conforming to the individualist reality, we can still acknowledge the preferability of unity, including "big unity" as found in the popular world religions.
3 - REDEEMING APOCALYPTICISM
I have seen Apocalypticism as a symptom that something is wrong. And there is a lot of truth to that. A successful religion outgrows its own Apocalypticism. However, there is a way to justify/excuse this negative.
Unlike the more successful / popular religions, we have an actual need to hope for "the end" / the Apocalypse. We have an actual need for the Apocalypse, whereas Catholicism and Islam really don't. Our religion will inevitably die out if God doesn't come along and save it from extinction. That cannot be said about the well-established world religions of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. which do not have the same existential crisis, the same identity crisis, as the MJ religion.
I think if MJ was currently, or if MJ was supposed to be, a succesful and popular world-religion, God would not include an Apocalypse in his plan. Apparently MJ is meant, intended by God, to be in the state it currently is in.
I have said previously that any divisive group will have excuses for its divisiveness, but only those that can get past their divisiveness will survive and be a part of history and the plan of God. But maybe the plan of God is that the true religion will be scattered among disparate individuals with each their own understanding of the true religion, which leads to a diversity of expression of the Torah, true to the traditional proverb: "the Torah has 70 faces". Hence the present epoch is marked by a relativism and subjectivism (being side-effects of individualism) that we see to whatever degree in the other ideologies and religions of the world today as well.
IMPORTANT - READ BEFORE POSTING:
This thread is NOT an invitation for a critic to take one sentence or paragraph he or she disagrees with and just focusing a lot of negative energy into picking it apart, insulting others and being a besserwisser. This thread is about one specific human being's attempt to understand the plan and work of God as expressed in MJ today.
Your own personal stories of attempting to come to terms with, incorporate, rationalize or come to peace with MJ are welcome, particularly such as deal with being MJ in non-MJ surroundings.
This thread is about my personal attempt to come to terms with and explain (recasting positively) various MJ problems.
I have divided this into three sections, where I share my meditations on and attempts at finding perspectival solutions to what I see as problems plagueing and discrediting MJ in my personal estimation.
The first section creates the groundwork for the subsequent lines of thought.
In the second section I pick up the thread from the first section and I meditate over the fact that many people in the MJ community strongly oppose to any call to unity, which is also a problem, since it lacks perspective.
The third section is an attempt at reframing something negative in a postive perspective.
1 - FINDING RICHNESS OF EXPRESSION IN THE DISUNITY
There is unity and disunity. Both have a rich variant and a poor variant.
Our goal should be rich unity, but since that is not realistic goal right now, the goal of the individual adherent of MJ should be a rich individualism, a rich form of disunity.
By rich I mean to denote something both spiritually vibrant/vivacuous, but also diverse in a positive sense. By poor I mean to denote something less or not spiritually vibrant/vivacious, but also something not or less diverse.
2 - A CALL TO WIDENING PERSPECTIVE
Disunity can be bad, but also leads into Individualism.
Individualism leads to personal expression.
Personal expression leads to diversity.
Diversity leads to richness.
So while disunity can have many obvious negative effects, even becoming an existential threat to the affected entity/group, it can also have positive side-effects to be expressed in this present epoch prior to "the end."
I see many people who are very invested in the individualist conceptuality, who seem to think that disunity is a necessity, and that it is essentially good. I think disunity/individualism is not a necessity, and there are MANY examples from the past where divisiveness and individualism have been great sins, causing great harm to God's people and his religion. I think disunity is not essentially good, but rather something that can have both good and bad effects. It is, to be honest, extreme foolishness to view disunity as a necessity or as something that is only good. That leads into solipsism, that leads into elevating yourself, or simply put, arrogance. The same sin that traditionally led to the fall of the Satan. But that's beside the point.
The point is that while we can accept that the current epoch requires conforming to the individualist reality, we can still acknowledge the preferability of unity, including "big unity" as found in the popular world religions.
3 - REDEEMING APOCALYPTICISM
I have seen Apocalypticism as a symptom that something is wrong. And there is a lot of truth to that. A successful religion outgrows its own Apocalypticism. However, there is a way to justify/excuse this negative.
Unlike the more successful / popular religions, we have an actual need to hope for "the end" / the Apocalypse. We have an actual need for the Apocalypse, whereas Catholicism and Islam really don't. Our religion will inevitably die out if God doesn't come along and save it from extinction. That cannot be said about the well-established world religions of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. which do not have the same existential crisis, the same identity crisis, as the MJ religion.
I think if MJ was currently, or if MJ was supposed to be, a succesful and popular world-religion, God would not include an Apocalypse in his plan. Apparently MJ is meant, intended by God, to be in the state it currently is in.
I have said previously that any divisive group will have excuses for its divisiveness, but only those that can get past their divisiveness will survive and be a part of history and the plan of God. But maybe the plan of God is that the true religion will be scattered among disparate individuals with each their own understanding of the true religion, which leads to a diversity of expression of the Torah, true to the traditional proverb: "the Torah has 70 faces". Hence the present epoch is marked by a relativism and subjectivism (being side-effects of individualism) that we see to whatever degree in the other ideologies and religions of the world today as well.
IMPORTANT - READ BEFORE POSTING:
This thread is NOT an invitation for a critic to take one sentence or paragraph he or she disagrees with and just focusing a lot of negative energy into picking it apart, insulting others and being a besserwisser. This thread is about one specific human being's attempt to understand the plan and work of God as expressed in MJ today.
Your own personal stories of attempting to come to terms with, incorporate, rationalize or come to peace with MJ are welcome, particularly such as deal with being MJ in non-MJ surroundings.
Last edited: