The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science

Status
Not open for further replies.

TwinCrier

Double Blessed and spreading the gospel
Oct 11, 2002
6,069
617
54
Indiana
Visit site
✟24,768.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Another myth countered in Bethell’s book is the idea that, up until the 14th century, there was a long-standing, wide-spread belief that the earth was flat. The flat-earth myth was first heavily promoted by Washington Irving, the creator of Rip Van Winkle, in the early 19th century and later popularized further by John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White. The latter two, Draper a medical school dean at NYU and White the founder of Cornell University, wrote highly influential books promoting the existence of the “flat-earthers” in the late 1800s. Their works were among the first to pit so furiously religion against science.

The goal of these writers was to project religious persons, with a heavy focus on the Catholic Church, as being anti-science, anti-learning and as having actually repressed the idea that the earth was spherical for hundreds of years. As a result of their version of history becoming the scientific mainstream, Christopher Columbus has been erroneously transformed into a “bold rationalist who overcame ignorant churchmen and superstitious sailors” by proving that the earth was not flat. Reality would say that there was no reason to prove that the earth was round because very few people believed anything else. Thanks to nineteenth-century revisionists, history books tell a different story.
new, unknown species of animals continue to appear far more frequently than known species disappear;
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/books_entertainment/reviews/DustinHawkins/181390.html
Looks like an interesting read just from the few snippets presented. Adding this to the top of my to read list.
 

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
43
Cambridge
Visit site
✟32,287.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
With respect to the statement about Columbus: he was actually discouraged from going, not because it was thought that he would sail off the edge of the world, but because the prevalent model of the Earth was very accurate, with respect to size. The technology of the day only permitted a ship to go about as far as Europe to America, and not much farther. Columbus made a model of the Earth and fudged a lot of the numbers to make it appear as though a ship could make it all the way to Asia. Even by the time of Magellan, his ships only barely made it across the Pacific.

Good thing, for Columbus, America was in the way.
 
Upvote 0
T

The Lady Kate

Guest
Willtor said:
With respect to the statement about Columbus: he was actually discouraged from going, not because it was thought that he would sail off the edge of the world, but because the prevalent model of the Earth was very accurate, with respect to size. The technology of the day only permitted a ship to go about as far as Europe to America, and not much farther. Columbus made a model of the Earth and fudged a lot of the numbers to make it appear as though a ship could make it all the way to Asia. Even by the time of Magellan, his ships only barely made it across the Pacific.

Good thing, for Columbus, America was in the way.

Very true... No ship which was designed in the time of Columbus could've stored enough food for the journey... Columbus would've starved to death halfway to Asia.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.