The only real eschatology question

[Biblewriter]

Oh, and the Anti-Christ is not found in Daniel chapter 9. That's all about Yahshua. Martin Luther agrees. I have a Note on Facebook called The Tribulation which explains this. "The prince that shall come" is nowhere else used to describe the Anti-christ, so it's all a bunch of hocus-pocus trickery by Zionists and the so-called pastors and scholars they deceive or pay for.

Are you saying that the Zionists "deceived or paid for" the earliest Christin writers whose works have come down to us?

The doctrine that the last ruler of Rome would be the Antichrist was clearly taught in the very oldest Christian commentary on Bible prophecy (of any significant length) that has survived to the present day. That is the last twelve chapters of the famous work by Irenaeus titled "Against Heresies," which is thought to have been published between the years 186 and 188.

It was also taught in the very oldest Christian commentary on scripture which has survived to the present day. That is the commentay on Daniel written by Hyppolytus. This is thought to have been published between the years 202 and 211.

Preterism was not even invented until after these had been written.