Go on...There are real, tangible benefits to diversity in the workplace, in schools, and in communities. Diversity for diversity's sake is actually quite beneficial.
Upvote
0
Go on...There are real, tangible benefits to diversity in the workplace, in schools, and in communities. Diversity for diversity's sake is actually quite beneficial.
Diversity is never just for the sake of diversity. It's for the effects that diversity has on the human psyche. It's a lot easier to demonize the people on the other side of town than it is to demonize your best friends from school.So what's the problem here? People are going to the churches they want to go to aren't they? If not, they can go to another church. Diversity for the sake of diversity is pointless.
The easiest to demonize is demons, wherever they live.Diversity is never just for the sake of diversity. It's for the effects that diversity has on the human psyche. It's a lot easier to demonize the people on the other side of town than it is to demonize your best friends from school.
I mean I will consider bad people bad people regardless of where they live. If my friends are bad people, I'll know it. I have no reason to form an opinion about "people on the other side of town" because I've learned over the years to not put much stock in gossip or hearsay.'K? Not really a logical response. It doesn't comment on the veracity of what I said.
Ok, great. The problem at hand is that humans don't do that as a whole when there are distinctions that are easier to process, such as appearance, language, culture, etc.I mean I will consider bad people bad people regardless of where they live.
So, regarding the OP, what should we do? Should the government institute "busing"; send buses around town to force people to go to churches they'd rather not go to or else they'd already be going to?Ok, great. The problem at hand is that humans don't do that as a whole when there are distinctions that are easier to process, such as appearance, language, culture, etc.
Ok, great. The problem at hand is that humans don't do that as a whole when there are distinctions that are easier to process, such as appearance, language, culture, etc.
It doesn't have to. Integration lessens it.
Sad that people actually believe skin color is a tribe. Racism lives.Or exacerbates it. All it takes is for event X to occur and people will revert back to their tribes.
Sad that people actually believe skin color is a tribe. Racism lives.
Sad that people actually believe skin color is a tribe. Racism lives.
I honestly thought he was referring to tribalism - which is a concept not a literal tribe.
Never accused of racism, attitudes of tribalism based on skin color shows that racism lives.So do the endless, baseless, spurious accusations of "racism".
Never accused of racism, attitudes of tribalism based on skin color shows that racism lives.
The subject is integration and reverting to tribes due to "event X." I was not suggesting that that skin color is a literal tribe, but coalescing around others based on skin color is sad because it is an artificial barrier created based on notions of superiority as opposed to geography, language, customs, etc.I'm not sure what that has to do with what the poster stated though. You lost me.
The subject is integration and reverting to tribes due to "event X." I was not suggesting that that skin color is a literal tribe, but coalescing around others based on skin color is sad because it is an artificial barrier created based on notions of superiority as opposed to geography, language, customs, etc.