JohnR7 said:
Genesis 19:24
Then the Lord rained brimstone and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah, from the Lord out of the heavens.
Ok, so you do not question that there was a Sodom and a Gomorrah, and the Bible records the historical event of when they were destroyed by fire. What you question then is if there is a God and if God had anything to do with the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Also, we have a question of the salt pillars that we read about in the Bible and what the significance is of them, sense they are still there to be found also.
No, I do not argue that Sodom and Gomorrah may have existed. These two locations however remain among those without conclusive evidence for their existence. The PBS special you mention says that it may have been such, but with no records remaining from such, we cannot know for sure yet.
Even if we found evidence that Sodom and Gomorra did exist, and that they were destroyed by fire, the far more likely explanation would have been an actual fire, either staretd by man or natural causes, or a volcanic eruption. Either of which could be mistaken as divine retribution by the primitive people of the time.
JohnR7 said:
So what do you suggest then, that this is just a ploy that the religious leaders used to control the people? For example they would point to a natural disaster and then tell the people that this was a judgement from God for not listening to them the religious people?
It is a far more probale explanation that primitive, superstitous people upon seeing events or natural occurences they could not explain would claim a divine reason. This is how many religions(which you of course proclaim false relgions) started. People didn't know what caused fire, so they claimed god. What is lightning? God. Why does it rain? God. Where do babies come from? God. When we die to we live on somehow? God.
The more advanced societies have become, the more abstract their gods have had to become to stay current. Once we knew how to make fire, we no longer needed god to do it. We figured out lightning, no more thunder gods. We learned how the water cycle works, no more rain dancing. We learned human anatomy, DNA and the rest of the reproductive cycle, no more stork. Eventually perhaps we will even conquer death, or at least postpone it for extended periods, and the current gods of the afterlife will finally fall away.
The far more likely basis for Christianity is exactly this. That the god of the Abhramic religions is nothing more than the latest incarnation of even earlier gods. That these earlier gods were created by people to explain the then unexplainable.
Now to the point at hand. As I have said several times, present your evidence for the divine claims of the bible, or drop this line of argument as the pointless one that it is. The historical evidence or lack of such for places and even people in the Bible does nothing to deomstrate the veracity of the divine and miracluous claims on whcih your religion is actually based.
Or, show me where I can find Spiderman in New York.