Blayz...
You should get a clue when someone is letting you off the hook.
“It's simple math. If I have 62.7% of 30BP matches then i have 30throot of 0.627 (=0.9841) of 1BP matches, and then 0.9841^20 for 20BP matches and 0.9841^50 for 50BP matches.”
Pray tell what are you demonstrating? Probability? Binomial expansion over an interval? What is this? The .9841 seems to be occurrences/interval but you don’t deal with it in that way. Is it the total mutations/total bp? If it is why are you raising it to the interval power? By the way the selected interval is taken into 10,000 evenly spaced random entry points in a comparison of equivalent segments (those that align); the author just happened to use 30bp which is a multiple of 120bp commonly used in genetics. You have yet to justify your calculation…
As I stated early on, I am not here to win an argument. Remember I mentioned that the people who are here for that purpose don’t ever learn much. I never learn anything from someone who just makes stuff up.
You should get a clue when someone is letting you off the hook.
“It's simple math. If I have 62.7% of 30BP matches then i have 30throot of 0.627 (=0.9841) of 1BP matches, and then 0.9841^20 for 20BP matches and 0.9841^50 for 50BP matches.”
Pray tell what are you demonstrating? Probability? Binomial expansion over an interval? What is this? The .9841 seems to be occurrences/interval but you don’t deal with it in that way. Is it the total mutations/total bp? If it is why are you raising it to the interval power? By the way the selected interval is taken into 10,000 evenly spaced random entry points in a comparison of equivalent segments (those that align); the author just happened to use 30bp which is a multiple of 120bp commonly used in genetics. You have yet to justify your calculation…
As I stated early on, I am not here to win an argument. Remember I mentioned that the people who are here for that purpose don’t ever learn much. I never learn anything from someone who just makes stuff up.
Upvote
0