Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
In the 1970s, nearly 600 Canadian weather stations fed surface temperature readings into a global database assembled by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Today, NOAA only collects data from 35 stations across Canada.


Worse, only one station -- at Eureka on Ellesmere Island -- is now used by NOAA as a temperature gauge for all Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle.

American researchers Joseph D’Aleo, a meteorologist, and E. Michael Smith, a computer programmer, point out in a study published on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute, NOAA uses “just one thermometer [for measuring] everything north of latitude 65 degrees.”

Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say
 

chaim

Veteran
Jan 25, 2005
1,994
137
✟10,371.00
Faith
Other Religion
Well 5 minutes of research proves this claim to be bunk:

Here is a partial list of NOAA/NCDC data sources in Canada, the first 30 or so of which are ALL above the arctic circle.

So Voeglin, seeing the "climate skeptics" are wrong wouldn't you agree that they are "discredited" and are guilty of "lysenkoism"?

Or is it time to admit that none of your many posts have anything to do with science, but with your political agenda?



RecStation IDAWSWBANIDCOOPIDBegin DateEnd DateNameStateLatitudeLongitudeElevationCall SignCountry 1 Data 719770 99999 19950430 20091102 MARGARET LAKE 68.8º N 140.85º W 543 m WZR CA 2 Data 719780 99999 19950911 20100119 IVVAVIK PARK AUTO8 69.15º N 140.15º W 244 m CWOI CA 3 Data 729690 26463 19730802 19770630 KOMAKUK BEACH ARPT 69.583º N 140.183º W 1 m CA 4 Data 719690 26463 19770701 19930630 KOMAKUK BEACH ARPT 69.583º N 140.183º W 7 m CYAJ CA 5 Data 710460 99999 19981224 20100121 KOMAKUK BEACH 69.6º N 140.183º W 13 m CWKM CA 6 Data 729180 99999 19730104 19730318 PELLY BAY 1 73.033º N 85.15º W 1 m CA 7 Data 729240 99999 19730101 19770630 RESOLUTE AIRPORT 74.717º N 94.983º W 67 m CA 8 Data 710180 99999 20040803 20100121 RESOLUTE CS 74.717º N 94.983º W 68 m CXRB CA 9 Data 719240 99999 19471023 20100121 RESOLUTE AIRPORT 74.717º N 94.983º W 66 m CYRB CA 10 Data 719160 99999 19500102 20100121 THOMSEN RIVER 73.233º N 119.533º W 42 m CWYF CA 11 Data 693940 99999 19790721 19800118 DUNDAS PENINSULA 74.5º N 113.383º W 0 m CA 12 Data 729245 99999 19730104 19770630 REA POINT 75.35º N 105.717º W 1 m CA 13 Data 719245 99999 19770701 19871223 REA POINT 75.367º N 105.717º W 15 m ZRP CA 14 Data 719830 99999 19950430 20100121 REA POINT 75.367º N 105.717º W 15 m CZRP CA 15 Data 719740 99999 19961101 20100121 AULVIK NTL PARK 74.133º N 119.983º W 32 m CWSQ CA 16 Data 719246 99999 19781116 20100121 GRISE FIORD AIRPORT 76.417º N 82.9º W 45 m CWGZ CA 17 Data 719710 99999 20080402 20100121 GRISE FIORD CLIMATE 76.417º N 82.9º W 45 m CA 18 Data 694030 99999 19781013 19790517 DRAKE POINT 76.467º N 108.767º W 12 m CA 19 Data 710725 99999 19940325 19960602 MOULD BAY CAMP 76.233º N 119.317º W 12 m CWMD CA 20 Data 740720 99999 19500102 19770630 MOULD BAY AIRPORT 76.233º N 119.333º W 18 m CA 21 Data 719890 99999 20010916 20090921 MOULD BAY CS 76.233º N 119.333º W 12 m CWAY CA 22 Data 710720 99999 19480607 19970831 MOULD BAY 76.233º N 119.333º W 12 m CYMD CA 23 Data 694180 99999 19790503 19790601 CAPE ALLISON 77.833º N 100.267º W 0 m CA 24 Data 719248 99999 19811124 19830122 MALLOCH DOME(AUTO8) 78.217º N 101.05º W 12 m CWCN CA 25 Data 740740 99999 19500102 19770630 ISACHSEN (MAPS) 78.783º N 103.533º W 27 m CA 26 Data 710740 99999 19480505 20100120 ISACHSEN (AUT) 78.783º N 103.55º W 58 m CWIC CA 27 Data 719170 99999 19470902 20100121 EUREKA 79.983º N 85.933º W 10 m CWEU CA 28 Data 719174 99999 19920427 19920508 EUREKA 79.983º N 85.8º W 78 m CYEU CA 29 Data 729170 99999 19730101 19770630 EUREKA 80º N 85.933º W 9 m CA 30 Data 710824 99999 19911101 19921210 ALERT (READAC) 82.5º N 62.367º W 92 m ZLR CA 31 Data 710820 99999 19500911 20061003 ALERT 82.517º N 62.283º W 66 m CWLT CA 32 Data 710823 99999 19870305 20100121 ALERT 82.517º N 62.283º W 30 m CYLT CA 33 Data 729670 99999 19730101 19770630 BURWASH (AUTO8) 61.367º N 139.05º W 786 m CA 34 Data 719674 99999 19881107 20100121 BURWASH 61.367º N 139.033º W 807 m CYDB CA 35 Data 715050 99999 19911126 20100121 HAINES JUNCTION 60.75º N 137.583º W 599 m CWHT CA 36 Data 719676 99999 19431101 19850510 HAINES JUNCTION 60.767º N 137.583º W 599 m WHT CA 37 Data 729676 99999 19740102 19770628 HAINES JUNCTION 60.767º N 137.583º W 599 m CA 38 Data 719677 99999 19790131 19790227 HAINES JUNCTION 60.767º N 137.583º W 599 m YHT CA 39 Data 729675 99999 19730101 19770630 BEAVER CREEK ARPT 62.383º N 140.883º W 663 m CA 40 Data 719675 99999 19430821 20100121 BEAVER CREEK ARPT 62.417º N 140.867º W 649 m CYXQ CA 41 Data 717730 99999 20090912 20100121 WHITEHORSE AUTO 60.717º N 135.083º W 707 m CA 42 Data 729640 99999 19730101 19770630 WHITEHORSE AIRPORT 60.717º N 135.067º W 702 m CA 43 Data 710390 99999 20030618 20100121 CARMACKS CS 62.117º N 136.183º W 549 m CXCK CA 44 Data 719664 99999 19880301 20100121 DAWSON (AUTO8) 64.05º N 139.15º W 370 m CWON CA 45 Data 729660 99999 19730101 19770630 DAWSON AIRPORT 64.05º N 139.133º W 369 m CA 46 Data 719660 99999 19420402 20100121 DAWSON AIRPORT 64.05º N 139.133º W 370 m CYDA CA 47 Data 719493 99999 19840203 20100121 FARO 62.2º N 133.367º W 717 m CZFA CA 48 Data 719644 99999 19811124 19840118 FARO A 62.217º N 133.367º W 717 m ZFA CA 49 Data 719495 99999 19800423 19810623 FARO (MARS) 62.233º N 133.367º W 694 m CA 50 Data 740355 99999 19730101 19741231 KING POINT (MAPS) 62.233º N 133.367º W 694 m CA
favicon.ico
favicon.ico
wiki-favicon-sharpened.png
oneriot-favicon.ico

In the 1970s, nearly 600 Canadian weather stations fed surface temperature readings into a global database assembled by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Today, NOAA only collects data from 35 stations across Canada.


Worse, only one station -- at Eureka on Ellesmere Island -- is now used by NOAA as a temperature gauge for all Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle.

American researchers Joseph D’Aleo, a meteorologist, and E. Michael Smith, a computer programmer, point out in a study published on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute, NOAA uses “just one thermometer [for measuring] everything north of latitude 65 degrees.”

Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say
 
Upvote 0

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Well 5 minutes of research proves this claim to be bunk:
RecStation IDAWSWBANIDCOOPIDBegin DateEnd DateNameStateLatitudeLongitudeElevationCall SignCountry 1 Data 719770 99999 19950430 20091102 MARGARET LAKE 68.8º N 140.85º W 543 m WZR CA 2 Data 719780 99999 19950911 20100119 IVVAVIK PARK AUTO8 69.15º N 140.15º W 244 m CWOI CA 3 Data 729690 26463 19730802 19770630 KOMAKUK BEACH ARPT 69.583º N 140.183º W 1 m CA 4 Data 719690 26463 19770701 19930630 KOMAKUK BEACH ARPT 69.583º N 140.183º W 7 m CYAJ CA 5 Data 710460 99999 19981224 20100121 KOMAKUK BEACH 69.6º N 140.183º W 13 m CWKM CA 6 Data 729180 99999 19730104 19730318 PELLY BAY 1 73.033º N 85.15º W 1 m CA 7 Data 729240 99999 19730101 19770630 RESOLUTE AIRPORT 74.717º N 94.983º W 67 m CA 8 Data 710180 99999 20040803 20100121

Skip the junk, OK Chaim? Your endless graphs and charts and now the above, enlighten no one. Considering the errors in the IPCC report, the admission of fraud in the model used by Phil Jones in the CRU emails, the fact a scientist who worked on the IPCC report says they made stuff up to influence politicians and the citing of propaganda from World Wildlife in the IPCC report (IPCC is supposed to use only peer reviewed material), none of your graphs, charts and chicken scratchings such as the above mean anything.

This is being reported in major papers all over the place. NOAA has no comment of substance.
 
Upvote 0

chaim

Veteran
Jan 25, 2005
1,994
137
✟10,371.00
Faith
Other Religion
What junk? It took me all of 5 minutes to refute your article.

Lets get this straight, when the skeptics are wrong so much that the entire premise of the article is bunk, you don't care. Yet when there are some typos and dodgy references in the IPCC it should be entirely thrown out.
Why the double standard?




Skip the junk, OK Chaim? Your endless graphs and charts and now the above, enlighten no one. Considering the errors in the IPCC report, the admission of fraud in the model used by Phil Jones in the CRU emails, the fact a scientist who worked on the IPCC report says they made stuff up to influence politicians and the citing of propaganda from World Wildlife in the IPCC report (IPCC is supposed to use only peer reviewed material), none of your graphs, charts and chicken scratchings such as the above mean anything.

This is being reported in major papers all over the place. NOAA has no comment of substance.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,704
13,266
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟365,747.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Skip the junk, OK Chaim? Your endless graphs and charts and now the above, enlighten no one. [blah blah blah], none of your graphs, charts and chicken scratchings such as the above mean anything.

This is being reported in major papers all over the place. NOAA has no comment of substance.


Skeptic holds up picture of a cat:
"This is a tree!"

AGW:
"No. That is a picture of a cat, not a tree".

Skeptic:
There is nothing you can say to change my mind you liars!
 
Upvote 0