When you find some get back to us. Meanwhile your religion grew old.When you are able to understand what evidence is, let us know.
Upvote
0
When you find some get back to us. Meanwhile your religion grew old.When you are able to understand what evidence is, let us know.
When you find some get back to us. Meanwhile your religion grew old.
I think you are sore because I won't let you conflate issues, and pretend to be on the side of fact or knowledge.Still waiting for you to show that you understand what evidence is.
I think you are sore because I won't let you conflate issues, and pretend to be on the side of fact or knowledge.
Ask a direct question, and one not based on your imagination. Don't ask a what if about 'what if the tooth fairy (or same state past) waved her wand on isotopes'...I am noticing that you can't answer direct questions. Why is that?
What is evidence?
Tell the truth, I did. You have no evidence for your religious stories. You think it is clever to ask what it would look like if you did have some!? Well, if you did we would all know now wouldn't we !?Like I said, you can't answer direct questions.
It is what you have none of. The topic is radioactive dating so what evidence for that do you have? Your number game didn't work because you start off assuming present decay dunnit it all and made the ratios, while rejecting creation and the former nature with no proof.I am not the one lying. Define what evidence is.
What would have been produced depends on what started out at creation as well as the nature and laws of the day. Science doesn't know anything about either. That is why they have merely tried to impose dates on rocks based on present state decay. They are hopelessly limited. They are in a fishbowl intellectually. They cannot think outside their little box. Their lobotomized reality is a self imposed prison that resulted from not including God in their knowledge.
It is what you have none of. The topic is radioactive dating so what evidence for that do you have? Your number game didn't work because you start off assuming present decay dunnit it all and made the ratios, while rejecting creation and the former nature with no proof.
Define what evidence is.
It is what you have none of.
Would you be so kind as to define what you consider evidence to be, in a way that is not sarcastic or a jab at people participating in this thread?That which you fail to post.
Now give evidence for a present state in the past. You lack that something fierce.I don't have one of these. I guess this is what evidence is. What a good definition.
There is no evidence for a same state past. None. What would an invisible pink unicorn look like...same idea...Would you be so kind as to define what you consider evidence to be, in a way that is not sarcastic or a jab at people participating in this thread?
Now give evidence for a present state in the past. You pack that something fierce