Racists smear Bobby Jindal with hateful taunts

[nightflight]

wow...that brush is so big you could paint the grand canyon in an afternoon!
tulc(two coats!)

Perhaps and for that I apologize. I'm sure there are some who are in fact tolerant not just of conservatives who aren't white, but all people who have different views than their own.

 

[NightHawkeye]

It really irks white progressives when a person of color doesn't agree with them on issues.

It seems that those who would taunt Bobby Jindal are irked simply by any disagreement.

 

[nightflight]

As a conservative poster of non-color, I embrace the diversity of the GOP's Presidential contenders.

http://freebeacon.com/blog/non-whit...ing-for-president-and-liberals-cant-stand-it/

 

[TerranceL]

As a conservative poster of non-color, I embrace the diversity of the GOP's Presidential contenders.

http://freebeacon.com/blog/non-whit...ing-for-president-and-liberals-cant-stand-it/

Ah the Piyush argument reminds me of something, when Obama went from "Barry" in college to "Obama" when he decided to run for office. I imagine anybody who would have said he ran away from his race in college would have been called a racist, same with anybody who would have said that he exploited his race by changing the name he was known by when he ran for office.

 

[benedictaoo]

I live in LA. Jindal ruined our state. Worse governor we ever had. Has the worse approval rating. What he's done to mental heath here for the poor is a cry and a shame.

 

[Albion]

Racists have smeared Gov. Jindal just as they did Gov. Haley in SC.

 

[fatherjimparker]

<<Racial turmoil? Indian on former Indian? By saying Jindal has turned white? Little overboard with the importance of this issue, isn't it? >>

Slander of good people is ok by you?

For some time now, it has been a strategy of the left to divide the country along racial lines. What Jindal did was to challenge that strategy and that challenge has met with the standard response of the left: defamation.

From Saul Alinski's Rules fro Radicals: RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

<< I hate to break it to you but the left has most of the people of color in their camp. >>

Which is exactly why that do not hesitate to attack any person of color who has the temerity to call then on their race-baiting routine. It particularly infuriates the progressive/socialists when the person of color who challenges their racism is person who holds an important office or is a successful businessman/woman. Thus the slander by the progressive/socialists of Colin Powell, Clarance Thomas, Herman Cain, Condoleezza Rice, Tim Scott.

Of course the progressive/socialists will run from any attempt to engage them in their use of people of color to advance their socialist agendas. (Like Obama taking the opportunity to exploit for his political agenda the grief of mourners at the funeral service for the people murdered by a nut-case in Charleston.)

<< Jindal has a 65% disapproval rating in his own state. >>

So what? The people who responded to the surveys are the same geniuses who elected Obama twice.

<< Herman Cain had no chance to win. >>

Says you.

He was getting a lot of attention until the "hit squad" came out of the woodwork to exploit the "black men all want to have sex with our white women" routine. The dominant, left-wing media were delighted to pick it up and run with it. (Though they tended to ignore the exploits of the sexual predator, Billy-Jeff Clinton seeing that he was a white, progressive/socialist, elitist like the dominant media.) The "black sex fiend seeks innocent white women for unspeakable horrors" routine is right out of the People's Socialist Demikkkratik Partai bag of tricks used to put down any "colored folk" who don't tow the party line. And since the Republicrats only pretend to be the opposition party, there was not a peep from them in his defense.

Oh! You were unaware that conservatives can see right through the progressive/socialist's games?

You may have confused "conservative" with "Republican."

 

[fatherjimparker]

<<Herman Cain did a hatchet job on himself...>>

Funny how it's never a problem for the sexual predator who goes by the name of William Jefferson Clinton.

 

[Albion]

<< I hate to break it to you but the left has most of the people of color in their camp.

"In their camp," perhaps. That only means that they have the votes of more of them.

But it's equally true that the Republicans are the most open to them. I've seen the Democrat way close up. It's patronization. But the Republicans are the ones who don't routinely put up only white candidates for president. The Democrats do. Consider that Sen. Cruz, Sen. Rubio, and Dr. Carson, and Gov. Jindal are among the leading candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.

And for the Dems? Two white senior citizens.

 

[fatherjimparker]

Where did you get this idea?

Same place i got the idea that the sky is blue.

 

[Givemeareason]

Same place i got the idea that the sky is blue.

Fair enough. You were looking up into the sky when you got the idea.

 

[rambot]

It really irks white progressives when a person of color doesn't agree with them on issues.

Everyone I saw quoted in the source in the OP was an INDIAN-American. They didn't appear very white. Most white progressives I know don't really care when a person of colour disagrees with them. I tend to see more vitriole coming from within their own community.
I'm not sure if your post, then is a non-sequitor, or just plain wrong.

 

[rambot]

<<Racial turmoil? Indian on former Indian? By saying Jindal has turned white? Little overboard with the importance of this issue, isn't it? >>

Slander of good people is ok by you?

For some time now, it has been a strategy of the left to divide the country along racial lines. What Jindal did was to challenge that strategy and that challenge has met with the standard response of the left: defamation.

So the idea of celebrating AND identifying with your cultural heritage (by hyphenating your name) is some kind of "racist" strategy perpetuated by the left? You have no idea what helps to create and shape a person and their values, do you?

<< I hate to break it to you but the left has most of the people of color in their camp. >>

Which is exactly why that do not hesitate to attack any person of color who has the temerity to call then on their race-baiting routine. It particularly infuriates the progressive/socialists when the person of color who challenges their racism is person who holds an important office or is a successful businessman/woman. Thus the slander by the progressive/socialists of Colin Powell, Clarance Thomas, Herman Cain, Condoleezza Rice, Tim Scott

Of course the progressive/socialists will run from any attempt to engage them in their use of people of color to advance their socialist agendas. (Like Obama taking the opportunity to exploit for his political agenda the grief of mourners at the funeral service for the people murdered by a nut-case in Charleston.)

It's interesting the level of tribalism in American politics. Now even someone's race and cultural upbringing is LESS important to shaping identity than their political affiliation. Well, whatever hope for intelligent discourse in politics was left, will be flushed down the toilet because nobody would compromise their political leanings; only the colour of their skin and the values given to them by their community and family are expendable now.

<< Jindal has a 65% disapproval rating in his own state. >>

So what? The people who responded to the surveys are the same geniuses who elected Obama twice.

Yes, they made the mistake of voting for a conservative. Who knows if they'll learn.

<< Herman Cain had no chance to win. >>

Says you.

He was getting a lot of attention until the "hit squad" came out of the woodwork to exploit the "black men all want to have sex with our white women" routine. The dominant, left-wing media were delighted to pick it up and run with it. (Though they tended to ignore the exploits of the sexual predator, Billy-Jeff Clinton seeing that he was a white, progressive/socialist, elitist like the dominant media.)

It's true! I can honestly say I NEVER heard a THING about
Clinton's penchant for the ladies or about any of his improprieties. Oh wait! Bill Clinton the ex-president! No, I heard all kinds of stories about him. All. The. Time. I thought you were talking about George Clinton.

]The "black sex fiend seeks innocent white women for unspeakable horrors" routine is right out of the People's Socialist Demikkkratik Partai bag of tricks used to put down any "colored folk" who don't tow the party line. And since the Republicrats only pretend to be the opposition party, there was not a peep from them in his defense.

Oh! You were unaware that conservatives can see right through the progressive/socialist's games?

You may have confused "conservative" with "Republican."

Well, I was aware that conservatives can create, misconstrue, misunderstand, and bloviate about the actions of the Red Tide that is taking over the states. And that seems to be going on here too.

 

[TerranceL]

Everyone I saw quoted in the source in the OP was an INDIAN-American. They didn't appear very white. Most white progressives I know don't really care when a person of colour disagrees with them. I tend to see more vitriole coming from within their own community.
I'm not sure if your post, then is a non-sequitor, or just plain wrong.

I've seen white liberals call minority conservatives "uncle toms" and such when they were disagreed with. It's twitter but still the sentiment is there.

 

[whatbogsends]

<<Herman Cain did a hatchet job on himself...>>

Funny how it's never a problem for the sexual predator who goes by the name of William Jefferson Clinton.

Are you suggesting that Clinton didn't get attacked for his sexual history?

Cain's self-hatchet job was more than just the sex allegations.

 

[rambot]

I've seen white liberals call minority conservatives "uncle toms" and such when they were disagreed with. It's twitter but still the sentiment is there.

I make a point of NEVER speaking in absolutes because idiots have NO boundaries. of COURSE there are people who do that. I take umbrage at the idea that all white liberals do this (as the original quote seems to suggest).
I don't say "All white conservatives are racist but they refuse to acknowledge their latent racism because if it isn't lynching or Jim Crow laws, it's not racism". I say "SOME white conservatives are racist but they refuse to acknowledge their latent racism because if it isn't lynching, killing, or Jim Crow laws, it's not racism".

 

[nightflight]

I've seen white liberals call minority conservatives "uncle toms" and such when they were disagreed with. It's twitter but still the sentiment is there.

Words on twitter don't count. Not until they do.

 

[nightflight]

I make a point of NEVER speaking in absolutes because idiots have NO boundaries. of COURSE there are people who do that. I take umbrage at the idea that all white liberals do this (as the original quote seems to suggest).
I don't say "All white conservatives are racist but they refuse to acknowledge their latent racism because if it isn't lynching or Jim Crow laws, it's not racism". I say "SOME white conservatives are racist but they refuse to acknowledge their latent racism because if it isn't lynching, killing, or Jim Crow laws, it's not racism".

Lol, no one said "all white liberals do this".

 

[fatherjimparker]

<< Most white progressives I know don't really care when a person of colour disagrees with them. >>

Most that I know are very quick to label anyone a racist and a hater who disagrees with any of Obama's policies or who didn't vote for him. "Racist" and "hater" are their favorite go to responses.

<< I tend to see more vitriole coming from within their own community. >>

I see the vitriol coming from people with an investment in being a minority and being distinct from other Americans. Jindal was proclaiming the message that Americans need to leave that divisive political nonsense behind. That is what those few people were angry about.

<<I'm not sure if your post, then is a non-sequitor, or just plain wrong.>>

I'm not sure you have any interest in understanding the investment in racial strife that has been made by the Democratic Party in particular and progressive/socialists in general.

Racial strife keeps people looking at each other with suspicion rather than the politicians who are getting very wealthy selling the country to the highest bidders while we are preoccupied with the turmoil they stir up.

I personally don't much care any more. Both parties have become an anthology of pros, a high priced bordello for Wall Street and Banking. They'll do anything for the right price and have no goal higher than feathering their beds and keeping "Tea Party" conservative, constitutionalists silent and impotent.

The USA is over. It was looking pretty good for a while in the 60s. Then they assassinated Rev. King and threw all moral compasses in the sea. The country has not had a national moral leader since then and we have been going down the toilet of socialist-materialist misery ever since and we aren't at the end of the road yet. There's much more to come.

But my citizenship is from above.

And all this soap opera down here, it don't mean nuthin'...nuthin' at all.

 

[fatherjimparker]

[QUOTE Are you suggesting that Clinton didn't get attacked for his sexual history?>>

I assert that he got a pass on his activity.

None of it, like sending Arkansas State Troopers out for harlots while he was Governor or getting serviced by Monica in the Oval Office kept him from getting the Democratic nomination or out of the white house.