Prophetic Time

[JudaicChristian]

1290+777=2067-100=1967 The taking of Jerusalem. 2067 is the 100th anniversary. Also 2067AD-2000=67AD The distruction of the Temple.

 

[squint]

1290+777=2067-100=1967 The taking of Jerusalem. 2067 is the 100th anniversary. Also 2067AD-2000=67AD The distruction of the Temple.

Have you ever run the numbers on the Jewish calendar years? Obviously you are using the gentile calendar. Just curious...I am clueless on the Jewish calendar.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

That part is not biblical. It,s a Gnostic corruption of scripture.

Which part?

Thou speakest with forkest tongue me thinks and by referring to that as "gnostic" without any explanation of why, you have just lost all credibility with me as far as I am concerned.........

 

[squint]

Which part?

Thou speakest with forkest tongue me thinks and by referring to that as "gnostic" without any explanation of why, you have just lost all credibility with me as far as I am concerned.........

Seriously LLoJ, that 'story' comes from the general field of Jewish replacement theology or manifest sons of God theology, which is kinda the same branch of Jewish replacement theology. And a lot of those sects and their writings sprang from the charismatic movement in general.

Some of their stuff (their understangings) is passably OK. A lot of their particular understandings i.e. various details here and there FAR SURPASS old school orthodoxy (by leaps and bounds)

...but that particular application is so utterly full of holes I wouldn't know where to start.

Some people get into these various camps and never come out of them. They are good places to study and move on.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Seriously LLoJ, that 'story' comes from the general field of Jewish replacement theology or manifest sons of God theology, which is kinda the same branch of Jewish replacement theology. And a lot of those sects and their writings sprang from the charismatic movement in general.

Some of their stuff (their understangings) is passably OK. A lot of their particular understandings i.e. various details here and there FAR SURPASS old school orthodoxy (by leaps and bounds)

...but that particular application is so utterly full of holes I wouldn't know where to start.

Some people get into these various camps and never come out of them. They are good places to study and move on.

Whatever squint.....guess that makes me "anti-jewish" then eh? ....I view everthing fulfilled on OC "judah/israel" anyway so you and JC continue on ehehe............

 

[squint]

Whatever squint.....guess that makes me "anti-jewish" then eh? ....I view everthing fulfilled on OC "judah/israel" anyway so you and JC continue on ehehe............

Yeah, you are getting yerself a strange mix going there buddy. A little Manifest Sons theology mixed with full preterism...

Could be the makings of yet ANOTHER sect...heh heh heh

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Yeah, you are getting yerself a strange mix going there buddy. A little Manifest Sons theology mixed with full preterism...

Could be the makings of yet ANOTHER sect...heh heh heh

One forum put those who call themselves Preterists [whether Partial or Full] on the "Religious Movements" board

RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS - CARM.ORG - Christian Discussion Forums
RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS

Preterism - CARM.ORG - Christian Discussion Forums
Preterism

 

[squint]

One forum put those who call themselves Preterists [whether Partial or Full] on the "Religious Movements" board

RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS - CARM.ORG - Christian Discussion Forums
RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS

Preterism - CARM.ORG - Christian Discussion Forums
Preterism

I'll pass on making any movement comments....

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

I'll pass on making any movement comments....

 

[JudaicChristian]

Have you ever run the numbers on the Jewish calendar years? Obviously you are using the gentile calendar. Just curious...I am clueless on the Jewish calendar.

The only Hebrew calendar application is The book of Enoch. The resurrection is in two days which is the beginning of the sixth day (6000) Hebrew calendar time. The entering of the Lords rest is the third day, which is the beginning of the seventh day (7000) Hebrew calendar time.

 

[JudaicChristian]

I'll pass on making any movement comments....

There sure is a lot of movement going on.

 

[JudaicChristian]

Which part?

Thou speakest with forkest tongue me thinks and by referring to that as "gnostic" without any explanation of why, you have just lost all credibility with me as far as I am concerned.........

We have discussed that before LLoJ. There is no indication that it is a parable, and it only promotes the concept of hell. The five bros can not be parabolic, because not all are condemned to Gehenna.

 

[JudaicChristian]

Who can solve this parable? 12 x ? = ? The answer to this parable is hidden in a box. There is only one answer. So what is 12 x _ = _

 

[squint]

The only Hebrew calendar application is The book of Enoch. The resurrection is in two days which is the beginning of the sixth day (6000) Hebrew calendar time. The entering of the Lords rest is the third day, which is the beginning of the seventh day (7000) Hebrew calendar time.

Not sure what you mean about the Hebrew calendar application is the book of Enoch.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

We have discussed that before LLoJ. There is no indication that it is a parable, and it only promotes the concept of hell.
The five bros can not be parabolic, because not all are condemned to Gehenna.

You and I will just have to agree to disagree

 

[JudaicChristian]

Not sure what you mean about the Hebrew calendar application is the book of Enoch.

The Book of Enoch has a 6th and 7th day parable. I think, it,s been awhile since I read it. Anyway, the Lords rest begins on the 7th day. 7000

 

[JudaicChristian]

You and I will just have to agree to disagree

In regards to the Lazurus rich man poor man script. It can not be a matter of fact, because people are not condemed because they have wealth. Yahshua would not have made that mistake.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

In regards to the Lazurus rich man poor man script. It can not be a matter of fact, because people are not condemed because they have wealth. Yahshua would not have made that mistake.

That depends on ones biblical view of "rich"

Reve 3:17 That thou are saying that rich/plousioV <4145> I am, and I have become rich and not yet one need I am having.
And not are aware that thou are the weight-calloused and forlorn and poor/ptwcoV <4434> and blind and naked.

 

[JudaicChristian]

That depends on ones biblical view of "rich"

Reve 3:17 That thou are saying that rich/plousioV <4145> I am, and I have become rich and not yet one need I am having.
And not are aware that thou are the weight-calloused and forlorn and poor/ptwcoV <4434> and blind and naked.

This parable is of a spiritual nature.
Revelation 3:16. So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. 17. You say, 'I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.' But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.

 

[squint]

In regards to the Lazurus rich man poor man script. It can not be a matter of fact, because people are not condemed because they have wealth. Yahshua would not have made that mistake.

Thank God at least somebody on this forum sees the term rich is NOT associated with CASH in the scriptures.

And hey, I hope your not asking any of us to [image] guess what's in the box. That is playing with imagery. So, don't keep me hangin' here...