It wasn't for the WMDs, we know that now. It wasn't because Saddam was just a mean 'ol dictator, there's lots of them in the world. It wasn't for the terrorism, for the 9/11 Commission had already established that Iraq had no ties to international terrorism before the war. So what was it then?
I wonder if this was written into that secret energy policy Cheney successfully avoided disclosing a year or two ago (remember, Cheney was previously CEO of the Halliburton energy company which has recieved many non-compete contracts and has overcharged the Government on many occassions). And of course Bush owned Harken Energy and in fact cashed in on some insider trading but never got convicted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/06/business/worldbusiness/06saudi.html?pagewanted=print
August 6, 2005
Why America Is More Dependent Than Ever on Saudi Arabia
By JAD MOUAWAD
Among the fringe benefits of removing Saddam Hussein from power, went the thinking in the United States at the time, would be a rapid recovery of that country's oil production. In some hawkish circles in Washington, it was thought that a free Iraq would eventually undercut OPEC's power and marginalize Saudi Arabia...and provided more fodder to the theory that American troops went into Iraq to break OPEC's back, weaken the Saud dynasty and reduce the kingdom's oil-based influence.
<snip>
I wonder if this was written into that secret energy policy Cheney successfully avoided disclosing a year or two ago (remember, Cheney was previously CEO of the Halliburton energy company which has recieved many non-compete contracts and has overcharged the Government on many occassions). And of course Bush owned Harken Energy and in fact cashed in on some insider trading but never got convicted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/06/business/worldbusiness/06saudi.html?pagewanted=print
August 6, 2005
Why America Is More Dependent Than Ever on Saudi Arabia
By JAD MOUAWAD
Among the fringe benefits of removing Saddam Hussein from power, went the thinking in the United States at the time, would be a rapid recovery of that country's oil production. In some hawkish circles in Washington, it was thought that a free Iraq would eventually undercut OPEC's power and marginalize Saudi Arabia...and provided more fodder to the theory that American troops went into Iraq to break OPEC's back, weaken the Saud dynasty and reduce the kingdom's oil-based influence.
<snip>