Perhaps it's because we judge the individuals before we judge the group...? Of course some groups are bad throughout. But not all are.strange how the anti-government right wingers invariably defend the government under these circumstances
Perhaps it's because we judge the individuals before we judge the group...? Of course some groups are bad throughout. But not all are.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/13/o...-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0
Police murder blacks and other minorities over nothing.
what we can say with certainty: none of these people will be doing anything, good or bad, from now on.What would be interesting is knowing "X number of people saved by police having killed 742 people in 2015."
Really? Like this one: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/03/24/cop-accidentally-shot-woman-back-work/70406706/We know that if 742 people were killed, then legal force was necessary and the alternative was necessary.
I'm...not actually sure what this even means.We could assume that some officer could run away, meaning not necessarily 742 would die.
truthfully people don't have to even threaten police to get killed.That would also mean we'd live in a world where anyone who threatened police could do whatever they wanted.
what we can say with certainty: none of these people will be doing anything, good or bad, from now on.
Really? Like this one: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/03/24/cop-accidentally-shot-woman-back-work/70406706/
the officer was trying to shoot the family dog but ended up killing the wife instead.
How was this force necessary?
or this one a man killed for "walking with a purpose"?:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...king-with-a-purpose-towards-her-10312095.html
Apparently owning a dog and "walking with a purpose" are capitol crimes?
truthfully people don't have to even threaten police to get killed.
tulc(needs more coffee)
And we can say with certainty they almost all if not all did something really bad to someone which got them killed.
The dog was going to attack him and he defended himself and she was shot by accident.
Why is this an issue for you? It was an accident and determined to be an accident. Cops have car accidents.
Because the dog was charging him. What do you prefer he do? Ask the dog nicely to not attack him?
Cops are not judges enforcing punishment. They do not dispense justice. They will kill you if you try to kill them. I do not see the issue. They are enforcing laws. In the first case one was defending him and accident shot someone in the process which is extremely unfortunate - and that is why we have laws and investigations. I am wondering how things work in your head - if you kill someone by accident - you are guilty of murder? That's why we have courts.
You have to threaten a police officer to be lawfully killed. There are no laws that say police can kill people if they feel like it.
If a police officer kills someone by accident, they have to show there was no negligence.
I then pointed out two cases, of the 700+ deaths, that had nothing to do with "necessary force" Two cases (easily found by the way) where no one was trying to kill either officers but someone still ended up dead. Here's another something to think about: if you or I shot at a neighbor dog and killed one of the owners instead what are the chances we would be given paid vacations, have our friends investigate the deaths and then get our jobs back? Or if someone walked up on us in our car and we shot them through the window do you think we wouldn't get arrested? My point for this thread is to try and provide some information that wasn't being posted anywhere on CF and I thought it was important for people to start paying attention to all the people who were dying after coming in contact with US police.We know that if 742 people were killed, then legal force was necessary and the alternative was necessary.
strange how the anti-government right wingers invariably defend the government under these circumstances
Yeah, it's like the brotha they had to off in St Louis the other night...
Hey, dipwad! - If you point a gun at the law dawgz, they gonna kill you dead!
It's rare that cops just kill for sport... sure there are always bad apples in any profession, but the vast majority of people the law dawgz had to off - needed to be shot!
Here's what God Almighty says about it:
Romans 13:1-4
Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
Whosoever therefore resists the power, resists the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he bears not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, for revenge to execute wrath upon him that does evil.
God be backin up the law dawgz... satan be inciting the thugz... which side you on???
if you look at your post you said:
I then pointed out two cases, of the 700+ deaths, that had nothing to do with "necessary force" Two cases (easily found by the way) where no one was trying to kill either officers but someone still ended up dead.
Here's another something to think about: if you or I shot at a neighbor dog and killed one of the owners instead what are the chances we would be given paid vacations, have our friends investigate the deaths and then get our jobs back?
Or if someone walked up on us in our car and we shot them through the window do you think we wouldn't get arrested?
My point for this thread is to try and provide some information that wasn't being posted anywhere on CF and I thought it was important for people to start paying attention to all the people who were dying after coming in contact with US police.
tulc(noticed you never actually addressed the second example he posted)
I have had contact with police. I have worked with law enforcement and even got a few traffictickets. Want to know how I survived?
I DID NOT ATTACK THEM.
What would be interesting is knowing "X number of people saved by police having killed 742 people in 2015."
We know that if 742 people were killed, then legal force was necessary and the alternative was necessary. We could assume that some officer could run away, meaning not necessarily 742 would die.
That would also mean we'd live in a world where anyone who threatened police could do whatever they wanted.
What would be interesting is knowing "X number of people saved by police having killed 742 people in 2015."
We know that if 742 people were killed, then legal force was necessary and the alternative was necessary. We could assume that some officer could run away, meaning not necessarily 742 would die.
That would also mean we'd live in a world where anyone who threatened police could do whatever they wanted.