a) I never said that
I was insulted
b) I never "attacked" your beliefs
I have not upbraideded anything.
Imagine if we Orthodox told you guys that Rome needed to be consecrated to the Theotokos and that somehow the heart and soul of Western Christendom was lacking Marian consecration, so we're going to have our Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople go to Rome and bless it! It implies something lacking in your patriarch there, something unfullfilled, incomplete.
By the way, Holy Orthodox Church is a better label than Eastern Orthodox. It may seem nuance, but I personally hate the term "Roman Catholic" that some Orthodox incorrectly use. It is technically "The Catholic Church." That is what your communion wants to be called, so I call it that.
Russia was atheistic in secular terms, but surely you're wise enough to know the heavy outpouring of devotion to Holy Orthodoxy in Russia despite cruel Soviet persecution, right? Russia was already consecrated to the Theotokos by Russian patriarchs, bishops, and priests. There is no need to re-consecrate a nation. To say it is required implies the consecrations to the Blessed Theotokos by Russian Orthodox patriarchs is somehow lacking.....now, being a reasonable and thoughtful person, can you not see how that could be taken as an insult?
I am not attacking a belief, but rather making a statement that this is a divisive and, imho, moot issue. Bringing it up after it's considered by many if not most Catholics a dead issue, is to foster bad feelings with the Orthodox, whom so many Catholics wish to reunite with someday. If they are sincere about such reunion, then respecting the Orthodox in this matteris important I would think, right?
We always
welcome your
prayers and value them, but we don't welcome re-consecrations. It's unnecessary and sends a message.
I am aware that this is your "living room." I haven't messed up the couch, love seat, chairs, coffee table, or paintings. No broken stuff. I'm merely giving you a perspective. If someone were to mention this in TAW, I wouldn't see it as an attack.
My priest came to our home tonight to bless it. We were talking about the Catholic Church and speculating who would be your next pope. We agreed that the Church has some good guys from which to choose and we hope that they get another Ratzinger/B16 pope who is faithful to traditions and has such a balanced approach. My priest likes Benedict a lot. He's said that to me on MANY occasions. Yes, we disagree with you guys on several key things, but in the end respect you and wish you the best. I think that's a given. The Catholic Church does too much good for the world and stands firmly against evil too much to be taken lightly....
No one has insulted you or the EO here. If you feel insulted then this is something you are bringing with you here into our home.
This may be how you feel, but you must realize there are going to be those points of disagreement between the EO and the Catholic Church. But that doens't give either the right to go into the other's forum and insult or upbraid the other Church by saying how insulting their actions or beliefs are, etc.
This is not the place to attack our belief.
In our point of view, the Pope is over the entire Church and the entire world is under his care and it is most appropriate and right for him to do as our Lady has requested and consecrate Russia to Her especially when Russia was an atheistic nation governed by atheistic laws. It is with a pastors' heart it was done, not to lord it over the EO.
We are not in agreement and we understand you don't like some of what we believe or do. But this is OBOB - please respect our feelings in our own living room, especially during Lent.
IMHO, if anything one would think in Christian charity the EO should welcome our prayers as we would welcome theirs. This is not a competition, and that anyone would attempt to make it so must deeply grieve the Holy Spirit and The Theotokos.