That was my point.
Yes, and your point is irrelevant, because the homes are owned by the Sisters - which, curiously enough, was the part of my sentence that you cut off. Here's the explanation, re-stated: Since they are the employers, they enter into contracts with their employees to supply x salery and y benefits in exchange for the work that they've hired the employees for. The government's plan, though, is to say that ''you must offer z benefits, as well as the benefits you've already been offering, or else you will be fined''. The trouble is, z benefits are against these particular employers religious statutes. That doesn't matter to most people, because they've accepted the notion that secularists can tell everybody else that they must act just like them, or get out of the public sphere.
Upvote
0