- Jul 5, 2005
- 46,662
- 19,813
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I was actually listening to K-Love, which is a Christian radio station and they had a brief commercial about the flood. They said that in Psalms it mentions that before the flood, the mountains were lower than they are now and there weren't any low-lying areas. It wasn't until after the flood that the mountains were raised and the valleys were lowered. This is what is says in Psalms. The earth could've been much, much flatter than it is now. They also said that right now, there is enough water on the earth that if the earth was flatter (no high mountains or deep valleys) it would cover the earth over 8,000 feet! That's 1 1/2 miles. So, clearly, there wouldn't be the need for that much water in the first place to cover Mt. Everest, because it wasn't as high as it is now. This is what the bible says. What do you think?