Eve was 'not satisfied' with being made 'for' Adam. Satan 'knew' this and that is what he used to entice her. For the only manner in which one can be 'temped' is with something that they 'desire'. Satan knew what was in Eve's heart and that is exactly what he used against her. She wanted to 'be' Adam.
You said previously that you interpret Scripture literally. This isn't Scriptural, so it is either your own idea or you are quoting something you have read elsewhere.
It isn't even logical. You say that Eve was not satisfied with being made for Adam and that Satan used this against her? He didn't. Satan said to Eve, "HAS God said ....?" He was making her doubt what God had commanded.
Eve hadn't been created when God gave Adam this command, so presumably Adam told her about it. But either he didn't explain it very well or she misheard/wasn't listening, because when she repeated to the serpent what God had said, she got it wrong. That is a bit of a guess, but it does fit with 1 Timothy 2:12, 14. Paul says "A woman should learn in quietness and submission". Women were not educated or allowed to learn; Paul is saying that they should, "FOR" verse 14 "Eve was deceived". Seems to me that Paul is saying that women should learn so that they will not be deceived like Eve was. Adam had heard the command directly from God himself. He knew what God had told him and was unlikely to be deceived, or tricked; so the serpent approached Eve instead. Maybe Eve was thinking about something else when Adam was explaining God's command to her? Maybe she was talking, which could be why Paul made it clear that women should learn in silence.
But the whole temptation in Genesis 3 revolved around what God had said; Eve was being deceived and tempted to doubt God's word. This is what Satan does - tries to turn people against God. Satan was kicked out of heaven by God, and is the enemy of God; a liar and a murderer and the thief who comes to steal and destroy, John 10:10.
This was nothing to do with Eve's relationship with, or thoughts about, Adam.
There is absolutely no indication offered in Genesis that God had any sort of relationship with Eve. Eve was made 'for' Adam. Not for God. Adam was made 'for God'.
Genesis 1:26-27 says clearly that God created both men and women in his image.
Men and women are both made for God because he created both, has saved both, filled both with his Holy Spirit and made them his children. Both men and women are loved, saved, chosen, blessed, appointed, and given spiritual gifts by God.
But for all that suffer the same 'envy' of Eve, it is impossible to convince them of the 'truth'. For the 'truth' isn't what they desire, but their own will.
The "envy of Eve" is your own idea, not a Scriptural teaching.
But it would seem that to 'some', it doesn't matter. They want what they want and God's will is 'far far' from their hearts.
Nope.
Not only is that a judgement and an insult, it is based on the assumption that God cannot possibly want a particular thing, in this case for women to preach or be ordained, so rebellious women are acting from some feminist motivation.
That's not true either.
Anyone that can 'say' that they 'believe' that God has 'not' revealed Himself as 'masculine' is simply in 'denial of the truth'.
Jesus came a male; not question about that, and no problem with it.
God is Spirit - yes, he is referred to as "he" throughout Scripture, but also had female characteristics, like giving birth to us, and the word for the Holy Spirit is a feminine one. All I'm doing is pointing this out and asking a) how a Spirit can be defined as male and b) asking for your views on this. You have given neither.
If when I get to heaven I find that God is a male Spirit; completely and utterly male, that will make no difference to my faith, salvation or standing before him. I am saved because I believe that God sent Jesus to die for me. By his death I am reconciled to God, and am God's child, filled with God's Spirit.
God, not Goddess. Get it?
As I said, God is spirit and has also revealed that he has feminine characteristics.
He gave birth to us, he nurtures us. God said, "can a mother forget the children she bore? Even so, I will not forget you", Isaiah 49:15. Jesus also said he wanted to gather the people of Jerusalem as a mother gathers her young. The images of new life, giving birth, nurturing, brooding (the Spirit of God brooded over the waters at creation) are all feminine ones. As I said before, the writers, and Jesus, could have used masculine words and phrases - like "you need to have your engine replaced", or something similar. They didn't; they referred to God's work in feminine terms.
I doubt that you'll "get", or consider, this though, because you seem to be of the view that unless Scripture spells something out, it can't happen. Even though you are quite prepared to promote unscriptural ideas.
And let me offer this: It is 'impossible for me to 'believe' that God would call someone to be His representative that doesn't even recognize that God is 'HE'.
It may seem ludicrous to you, that doesn't mean that if someone suggests that God is Spirit, which is Scriptural, and neither male nor female, (even though everyone refers to him as male), they are denying the truth and God can never use them. If you read church history and open your eyes to what is going on today, you will see that that is not so. God specialises in doing the ludicrous.
And let me offer this as well. If one's 'first' encounter with the 'supernatural' was with Satan mimicking God, how would someone who has 'yet' to know God know the difference?
But it wasn't.
Genesis 1:26-30 says that God made male and female in his image, he blessed THEM, gave THEM all green plants for food and told THEM they were to rule over the animals and fish in the sea.
You can only say that Eve had no contact with God before the fall if you ignore Genesis 1 and assume that because we have no record of her interaction with God, that there wasn't any.
Ignoring God's word and reading things into it is not good.
I may get back to the rest of your post later. Basically, though, you seem to be urging people to accept what is in the Bible while you yourself put forward unscriptural ideas.