Not according to scientists http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.htmlA dwarf Planet is a planet.
Upvote
0
Not according to scientists http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.htmlA dwarf Planet is a planet.
You aren't appearing to understand the action taken. Again note the noun.Not according to scientists http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.html
With all the terrible news we see to often in the world, I have found the NASA mission to Pluto one of the most uplifting stories I've read in a long time. Whatever ones political or religious views, this is a wonderful story of human skill, tenacity and endeavour and I send my warm thanks and congratulations to the US for their contribution to science and discovery. Brilliant and awe inspiring.
AMEN!Basically they sent a probe 5 billion miles to take pictures of a Dwarf Planet on the very extremities of our solar system. America was the first to do that and that will stand in the history books long after your bridges have all fallen down. I hope America never loses the correct balance between wonders and welfare. Moon bases, asteroid mining and a man on Mars next please!
I know it's a planet. I can see it in the photos. Tell it to the evolutionists who had to send a probe all the way out there to see if it was there or not.A Dwarf Planet is a planet. 'Dwarf' is the moderating adjective.
To the best of my knowledge, no one has tried to scientifically claim that wasn't there anymore.Armoured, would you be happier if they had instead, probed Uranus?
No one has claimed it wasn't there anymore (except I guess you). They didn't send the probe to see if it was there or not. It was sent so that we could learn what it's precise size is and what it is composed of. What is it's relationship to other bodies in the Kuyper Belt. Is it's mass what we had previously thought. Are there more satellites that we couldn't detect from here. If we ever wanted to colonize it what would we expect. How suitable is it for an inner Solar System observatory. Are there valuable minerals on the surface. What is it that we don't even imagine that we would/could learn?To the best of my knowledge, no one has tried to scientifically claim that wasn't there anymore.
If they knew it was still there, why'd they say there's no planet out there?No one has claimed it wasn't there anymore (except I guess you). They didn't send the probe to see if it was there or not. It was sent so that we could learn what it's precise size is and what it is composed of. What is it's relationship to other bodies in the Kuyper Belt. Is it's mass what we had previously thought. Are there more satellites that we couldn't detect from here. If we ever wanted to colonize it what would we expect. How suitable is it for an inner Solar System observatory. Are there valuable minerals on the surface. What is it that we don't even imagine that we would/could learn?
Or we could have rebuilt how many bridges in this country with that money? $720 million to be exact.
BUT IF WE DON'T GIVE THE BILLIONARIES MONEY TO BUILD THEIR STADIUMS... UM.....Or we could leave the scientists alone and have the US government quit subsidising the NFL to the tune of $90 million (conservatively) a year. Let them play football in a park like everyone else.
BUT IF WE DON'T GIVE THE BILLIONARIES MONEY TO BUILD THEIR STADIUMS... UM.....
THE TERRORISTS WIN!
Only you are saying that.If they knew it was still there, why'd they say there's no planet out there?
ALLEGEDLY setting foot on the moon