- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,135
- 51,514
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
No, I haven't.Have you read the Jewish Believers websites
Upvote
0
No, I haven't.Have you read the Jewish Believers websites
Even in the NT , slavery was not forbidden.But Jesus didn't come along and say, "God let you have bondsmen because you were hard, now I say cut it out". So when did it stop condoning slavery? The OT very clearly condones it.
Is it notarized ?God has a perfect will, and He has a permissive will.
No, I haven't.
In order to regulate something, you have to condone it first. I didn't say "encourage" or "approve".The Old Testament regulates [slavery]; just as it regulates divorce.
The attitude is: if you're going to do it, do it this way.
Psalm 106:15 And he gave them their request; but sent leanness into their soul.
God has a perfect will, and He has a permissive will.
And you wonder why people don't take you seriously when you can not be trusted to say or do the right thing, you go which ever way the wind blows.No.
In the same sense I don't think It condones divorce, even though It says:
Deuteronomy 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
Even in the NT , slavery was not forbidden.
These are both true. I'll even go so far to say that their slavery wasn't the same kind of slavery as America's checkered past, not just the slavery that exists today. However...It is NOT AT ALL like slavery in today's world everywhere.
This is not true. They were allowed to beat their slaves pretty savagely. And you can pay employees well enough that they have food to eat and clothes to wear and shelter to sleep under without treating them like property. So slavery isn't the lesser of two evils between owning people and leaving them to die in the streets.Remember though it was regulated - the slave owners have instructions to treat the slaves well, so that the condition of slaves is BETTER than if they were not slaves (often it meant they were able to have a place to stay and food to eat and clothes).
Who was allowed to ?They were allowed to beat their slaves pretty savagely.
I still think it is better not to let them to die in the streets.So slavery isn't the lesser of two evils between owning people and leaving them to die in the streets.
The Israelites. Exodus 21:20-21Who was allowed to ?
And it's even better to hire them and pay them a respectable wage, which was always an option. No need to even consider slavery.I still think it is better not to let them to die in the streets.
They were allowed to beat their slaves pretty savagely.
The Israelites. Exodus 21:20-21
A few points may be in order here:And it's even better to hire them and pay them a respectable wage, which was always an option. No need to even consider slavery.
why?Look again at the next verse that I cited.
why?
See: (notice this doesn't change anything) :
Exodus 21:21
KJ21
Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his money.
ASV
Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
AMP
If, however, the servant survives for a day or two, the offender shall not be punished, for the [injured] servant is his own property.
AMPC
But if the servant lives on for a day or two, the offender shall not be punished, for he [has injured] his own property.
BRG
Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
CEB
But if the slave gets up after a day or two, the slave owner shouldn’t be punished because the slave is the owner’s property.
CJB
except that if the slave lives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his property.
CEV
However, if the slave lives a few days after the beating, you are not to be punished. After all, you have already lost the services of that slave who was your property.
DARBY
Only, if he continue [to live] a day or two days, he shall not be avenged; for he is his money.
DRA
But if the party remain alive a day or two, he shall not be subject to the punishment, because it is his money.
ERV
But if the slave gets up after a few days, then the master will not be punished. That is because someone paid their money for the slave, and the slave belongs to them.
ESV
But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money.
ESVUK
But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money.
EXB
But if the slave gets well after a day or two, the owner will not be punished since the slave belongs to him.
GNV
But if he continue a day or two days, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
GW
But if the slave gets up in a day or two, the owner must not be punished. The slave is his property.
GNT
But if the slave does not die for a day or two, the master is not to be punished. The loss of his property is punishment enough.
HCSB
However, if the slave can stand up after a day or two, the owner should not be punished because he is his owner’s property.
ICB
But the slave might get well after a day or two. Then that owner will not be punished since the slave belongs to him.
ISV
But if the servant survives a day or two, the master is not to be punished because the servant is his property.
JUB
Notwithstanding, if he continues a day or two, he shall not be punished, for he is his money.
KJV
Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
AKJV
Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
LEB
Yet if he survives a day or two days, he will not be avenged, because he is his money.
TLB
However, if the slave does not die for a couple of days, then the man shall not be punished—for the slave is his property.
MSG
“If a slave owner hits a slave, male or female, with a stick and the slave dies on the spot, the slave must be avenged. But if the slave survives a day or two, he’s not to be avenged—the slave is the owner’s property.
MEV
Nevertheless, if he survives for a day or two, then he shall not be punished, for it is his money.
NOG
But if the slave gets up in a day or two, the owner must not be punished. The slave is his property.
NABRE
If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property.
NASB
If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
NCV
But if the slave gets well after a day or two, the owner will not be punished since the slave belongs to him.
NET
However, if the injured servant survives one or two days, the owner will not be punished, for he has suffered the loss.
NIRV
But they will not be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two. After all, the slave is their property.
NIV
but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.
NIVUK
but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.
NKJV
Notwithstanding, if he remains alive a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his property.
NLV
But if he or she lives a day or two, he will not be punished, for his servant belongs to him.
NLT
But if the slave recovers within a day or two, then the owner shall not be punished, since the slave is his property.
NRSV
But if the slave survives a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner’s property.
NRSVA
But if the slave survives for a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner’s property.
NRSVACE
But if the slave survives for a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner’s property.
NRSVCE
But if the slave survives a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner’s property.
OJB
Notwithstanding, if he continue a yom or two, he shall not be avenged; for he is his kesef.
RSV
But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be punished; for the slave is his money.
RSVCE
But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be punished; for the slave is his money.
TLV
Notwithstanding, if the servant gets up in a day or two he will not be punished, for he is his property.
VOICE
But if the slave survives a couple of days, then there will be no penalty because the slave belongs to the master.
WEB
Notwithstanding, if he gets up after a day or two, he shall not be punished, for he is his property.
WYC
Soothly if the servant liveth over this beating one day, or twain, the smiter shall not be subject to the pain of death, for the servant is his master’s chattel.
YLT
only if he remain a day, or two days, he is not avenged, for he [is] his money.
So? What does it change ? (WAIT! ) EDIT:Yes is does. It does change it since it means that if the slave can still work after the beating, then the slaver owner won't be punished.
So? What does it change ? (WAIT! ) EDIT:
NOTICE it is NOT A BEATING. IT IS being STRUCK (as in once) by a stick.
Not at all, especially in context here.... BEATING IS SYNONYMOUS WITH STRUCK!