My opinion about this nation and current events
- Thread starter katsung47
- Start date
- Status
718. Framing case went on (5/7/2012)
The April 14 case was failed to go through, the Feds continues for the new one. I think they prepared for another case in the end of April - my wife came back from her China trip on April 29.
Though the order of missile launch for North Korea had been cancelled at last moment, a new order was given. This time it was a nuclear test.
This time they didn't give a specific date of the nuclear test. It gave them more flexibility. If the Feds couldn't perfect a new framed case on 4/29, they could use it on next one.
The April 14 case was failed to go through, the Feds continues for the new one. I think they prepared for another case in the end of April - my wife came back from her China trip on April 29.
Though the order of missile launch for North Korea had been cancelled at last moment, a new order was given. This time it was a nuclear test.
This time they didn't give a specific date of the nuclear test. It gave them more flexibility. If the Feds couldn't perfect a new framed case on 4/29, they could use it on next one.
Upvote
0
719. "fake money" or "drug money" (5/12/2012)
In 2008, I found the Feds intended to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me through the hand of my relatives. I turned on to the bank. But later I found I was treated particularly when I paid the cashier in store or super market, I suspected that the money I withdrew from the bank were also "illegal" with a purpose of "planting". (see "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/08)" and " 572. How Feds plant (10/15/08)".
In 2011, a news solved my puzzel that the bank is operated by the Feds. It's easy for them to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me when I withdraw money from it.
The original bank I opened account with was a small one - World Savings. It later was taken over by the Wachovia. I think it was arranged by the Feds. They like to put their victims under their control. The "22-month investigation" was a lie too. At least in later 2008 the money I withdrew from Wachovia was "marked drug money' or "fake money" because I got particular surveillance when I spent them. It was since that time I would not touch one hundred bill. If the notes from the bank you couldn't trust on, anyone else?
The Feds (DEA and FBI here) used to make money on drug business. That's why the drug trading becomes prosperous under "war on drugs". My experience was one evidence. Though Wachovia played big role in drug money laundering, it was never charged. Because the real operator is the Feds.
In 2008, I found the Feds intended to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me through the hand of my relatives. I turned on to the bank. But later I found I was treated particularly when I paid the cashier in store or super market, I suspected that the money I withdrew from the bank were also "illegal" with a purpose of "planting". (see "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/08)" and " 572. How Feds plant (10/15/08)".
In 2011, a news solved my puzzel that the bank is operated by the Feds. It's easy for them to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me when I withdraw money from it.
The original bank I opened account with was a small one - World Savings. It later was taken over by the Wachovia. I think it was arranged by the Feds. They like to put their victims under their control. The "22-month investigation" was a lie too. At least in later 2008 the money I withdrew from Wachovia was "marked drug money' or "fake money" because I got particular surveillance when I spent them. It was since that time I would not touch one hundred bill. If the notes from the bank you couldn't trust on, anyone else?
The Feds (DEA and FBI here) used to make money on drug business. That's why the drug trading becomes prosperous under "war on drugs". My experience was one evidence. Though Wachovia played big role in drug money laundering, it was never charged. Because the real operator is the Feds.
Upvote
0
720. Fake money and brainwash (5/21/2012)
Peter Cheng, an 81 years old (2011) merchant, was prosecuted for passing counterfeit bills several times in gold coin trading in later May, 2007. Peter Cheng said he was innocent. The lawyer defended for him said that if the bank teller couldn't tell the notes, if the bank detection machines couldn't tell the notes, how did you expect ordinary people to tell?
There was a great possibility it could be a plant case. It was the time when I found the Feds tried to plant illegal money on me. Which forced me to turn on to the money withdrawn from the bank. But even with the bank the Feds could plant, I found it later.
I allege so because the Feds has a criminal style. They create case to justify their action. 911 was a good sample. To justify the war in Mid-east, they activated 911 false flag attack. To expand their power, they invent "War on terror". To justify their action, they created terror cases.
Ted Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed By Our CIA And FBI
Ted Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed By Our CIA And FBI - YouTube
So to frame a fake money case on a Chinese ethnic victim, they created a similar case on other Chinese ethnic people. At that time, I saw several "fake money" reports in Chinese newspaper. I think Peter Cheng, was unfortunately fallen into their trap.
It's a mind control. To create a situation to enbelieve people what the Feds told you. So far they sucessfully to make most people believe it's the Islamic extremist behind "terror attacks". Or "brainwash" as Feds referred.
Eric Holder 1995 "We must Brainwash People To Be Against Guns"
Eric Holder 1995 "We must Brainwash People To Be Against Guns" - YouTube
Peter Cheng, an 81 years old (2011) merchant, was prosecuted for passing counterfeit bills several times in gold coin trading in later May, 2007. Peter Cheng said he was innocent. The lawyer defended for him said that if the bank teller couldn't tell the notes, if the bank detection machines couldn't tell the notes, how did you expect ordinary people to tell?
There was a great possibility it could be a plant case. It was the time when I found the Feds tried to plant illegal money on me. Which forced me to turn on to the money withdrawn from the bank. But even with the bank the Feds could plant, I found it later.
I allege so because the Feds has a criminal style. They create case to justify their action. 911 was a good sample. To justify the war in Mid-east, they activated 911 false flag attack. To expand their power, they invent "War on terror". To justify their action, they created terror cases.
Ted Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed By Our CIA And FBI
Ted Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed By Our CIA And FBI - YouTube
So to frame a fake money case on a Chinese ethnic victim, they created a similar case on other Chinese ethnic people. At that time, I saw several "fake money" reports in Chinese newspaper. I think Peter Cheng, was unfortunately fallen into their trap.
It's a mind control. To create a situation to enbelieve people what the Feds told you. So far they sucessfully to make most people believe it's the Islamic extremist behind "terror attacks". Or "brainwash" as Feds referred.
Eric Holder 1995 "We must Brainwash People To Be Against Guns"
Eric Holder 1995 "We must Brainwash People To Be Against Guns" - YouTube
Upvote
0
721. Debit card case (5/26/2012)
When I found the Feds tried to plant the illegal money (fake money or marked drug money) on me, I abandoned the hundred dollar bill and turned on to small notes. Still, I found the Feds tried to feed illegal small notes to me. There was a period I wrote check to pay the super market. In 2011, I applied a debit card and since then I use it in my purchasing activities.
In later 2011, Bank of America intended to charge new fees on debit card customers. The news said other banks ready to follow. The unresonable new bank fee charge was protested by massive customers that in the end Bank of America had to cancel that plan, so did the othr banks.
I dependent on relatives' aid. I try to restrict my food expense within one hundred dollars a month. So I had a feeling that new bank fee was created against me.
Later that month, a news reported debit card ID stolen case.
Save mart and Lucky store in San Jose and Milpitas are the super markets I used to go for my food. Of course the thief who uses "extremely sophisticated" device to steal ID had never been caught. I think it was done by the Feds to intimidate after I started to use debit card.
I think all these cases and event happened at that time were created by the Feds. It was an effort to push me back to use the bank notes.
When I found the Feds tried to plant the illegal money (fake money or marked drug money) on me, I abandoned the hundred dollar bill and turned on to small notes. Still, I found the Feds tried to feed illegal small notes to me. There was a period I wrote check to pay the super market. In 2011, I applied a debit card and since then I use it in my purchasing activities.
In later 2011, Bank of America intended to charge new fees on debit card customers. The news said other banks ready to follow. The unresonable new bank fee charge was protested by massive customers that in the end Bank of America had to cancel that plan, so did the othr banks.
I dependent on relatives' aid. I try to restrict my food expense within one hundred dollars a month. So I had a feeling that new bank fee was created against me.
Later that month, a news reported debit card ID stolen case.
Save mart and Lucky store in San Jose and Milpitas are the super markets I used to go for my food. Of course the thief who uses "extremely sophisticated" device to steal ID had never been caught. I think it was done by the Feds to intimidate after I started to use debit card.
I think all these cases and event happened at that time were created by the Feds. It was an effort to push me back to use the bank notes.
Upvote
0
722. Sheriff Biden and $1 coin (6/5/2012)
To avoid falling into the trap of fake money or marked money set up by the Feds, I have to abandon the notes - even small amount one. Sometimes the purchase was only several dollars. I paid coins. Later last year, when the Feds worked hard to push me back to use the paper money, they also blocked the production of $1 coin.
Of course, people didn't know Biden worked on behalf of the Feds. They argued:
Anyone with common sense knows the simple math of savings if $1 coin is used: $184 million (savings of coin durability) - $50 million (production and storage cost) = 134 million annually. (or that $184 million has covered that cost already?)
This is a typical story how the Feds control this country with their informants. Vice president Biden worked relentlessly to block the $1 coin. He was awarded the title "Sheriff". Though it was not the first time to propose of production of $1 coin, the occasion was significant. There is a deficit crisis in US economy. Social programs are cut to save money. Even Pentagon has to shrink its spending. Yet, the Feds has its way to squander taxpayers' money for its case.
To avoid falling into the trap of fake money or marked money set up by the Feds, I have to abandon the notes - even small amount one. Sometimes the purchase was only several dollars. I paid coins. Later last year, when the Feds worked hard to push me back to use the paper money, they also blocked the production of $1 coin.
Of course, people didn't know Biden worked on behalf of the Feds. They argued:
Anyone with common sense knows the simple math of savings if $1 coin is used: $184 million (savings of coin durability) - $50 million (production and storage cost) = 134 million annually. (or that $184 million has covered that cost already?)
This is a typical story how the Feds control this country with their informants. Vice president Biden worked relentlessly to block the $1 coin. He was awarded the title "Sheriff". Though it was not the first time to propose of production of $1 coin, the occasion was significant. There is a deficit crisis in US economy. Social programs are cut to save money. Even Pentagon has to shrink its spending. Yet, the Feds has its way to squander taxpayers' money for its case.
Upvote
0
723. Hacker, terrorists, the real name of the Feds (6/10/2012)
US always accuses other countries and international hackers attacking the internet. Recently, a news revealed that US created virus "Stuxnet" and "flame" and attacked the other country with them. The criminal style is familiar. US had tried to frame Iraq to be the perpetrator of anthrax attacker and finally scientists found it came from US secret lab. So is Internet attack.
As a matter of fact, internet attack is a popular tactic used by the Feds. My computer is harassed by the Feds. The window screen I watch frequently missing. The written article lost paragraph function and being sectioned with different fonts and size, made it hard to read. Recently, some information stored in UBS is lost. Sometimes when I clicked up for a file, a pop up would say,
Another user is editing my file? Obviously it's the surveillance team. That's an open intimidation.
More over, I have been blocked to access some web sites last month. They are:
*Contra Coast Times.
* The TribTalk Message Boards have been taken offline indefinitely. A server move a few weeks ago corrupted the database, which would mean starting over with the boards. Considering the resources available to do that, and the relatively small amount of traffic the boards get, the decision was made to simply close them. We thank you for your participation and invite you to join in our story comments at sltrib.com or interact with us on Twitter (@sltrib) or Facebook (www.facebook.com/saltlaketribune). If you have any questions or concerns please email tribtalk@sltrib.com
http://www.tribtalk.com/showthread.php?t=35739
*The forum you selected has been retired.
http://forums.seattletimes.nwsource.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=6
All these web sites were set up by media. Media, though controlled by the Feds, have their own opinion on free speech. For most time, they would rather close the board than to censor the speech. So I think the problem to block me to access these web sites were created by the Feds through the surveillance server.
US always accuses other countries and international hackers attacking the internet. Recently, a news revealed that US created virus "Stuxnet" and "flame" and attacked the other country with them. The criminal style is familiar. US had tried to frame Iraq to be the perpetrator of anthrax attacker and finally scientists found it came from US secret lab. So is Internet attack.
As a matter of fact, internet attack is a popular tactic used by the Feds. My computer is harassed by the Feds. The window screen I watch frequently missing. The written article lost paragraph function and being sectioned with different fonts and size, made it hard to read. Recently, some information stored in UBS is lost. Sometimes when I clicked up for a file, a pop up would say,
Another user is editing my file? Obviously it's the surveillance team. That's an open intimidation.
More over, I have been blocked to access some web sites last month. They are:
*Contra Coast Times.
* The TribTalk Message Boards have been taken offline indefinitely. A server move a few weeks ago corrupted the database, which would mean starting over with the boards. Considering the resources available to do that, and the relatively small amount of traffic the boards get, the decision was made to simply close them. We thank you for your participation and invite you to join in our story comments at sltrib.com or interact with us on Twitter (@sltrib) or Facebook (www.facebook.com/saltlaketribune). If you have any questions or concerns please email tribtalk@sltrib.com
http://www.tribtalk.com/showthread.php?t=35739
*The forum you selected has been retired.
http://forums.seattletimes.nwsource.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=6
All these web sites were set up by media. Media, though controlled by the Feds, have their own opinion on free speech. For most time, they would rather close the board than to censor the speech. So I think the problem to block me to access these web sites were created by the Feds through the surveillance server.
Upvote
0
724. Frame a case of Chinese intelligence link(6/20/2012)
C.Y. is a brother of my sister in law. He and his wife W.S.had borrowed my wife's mini van in last May. Since then I alleged them tried to frame a relationship between my family and the Chinese secret police (or maybe "drug gang"? who knows.). (see "668. Chinese secret police (5/5/2011)") The tactic repeated three times, two in his brothers' name - C.Y. has two brothers.
In later February, for the third time in eight months, they asked to borrow the mini van again. The justification were same: they had to pick up their friends in air port with large amount of luggage. Since last May, I turned a cold shoulder to them. They let my brother and sister in law to pick up the car. I refused. I told my sister in law that I thought her brother couple were the Chinese agents and worked for the Feds. They had evil purpose to link my family to the Chinese secret police. I wish such a plain revelation would prevent C.Y. couple from harassing us any more.
One month ago, I trimmed the yard tree with a ladder. At night, the couple called my wife to borrow that ladder. Of course, I refused. I was surprised that even for the revealed snitch, the Feds would try to squeeze them for every bit of it.
Then early this month, I refused a dinner invitation. It was a family meal for my daughter's birthday. The reason I declined to go was I think the owner of that restaurant is a Chinese agent.
In 2000, I returned to the US from drift in South-east Asia. The travel company my wife worked for was moving to Milpitas. That restaurant opened a little bit later was in same shopping center - not far away from the entrance to that travel company. The restaurant supplies Shanghai dishes. The boss - G.X.B of R. was a woman came from Shanghai.
My wife soon became friend of G.X.B of R.. When my relatives came to San Jose, they used to go to that restaurant for the food of homeland taste.
I never go to that restaurant. I am too familiar with Feds' style. They put their snitches as close as possible and fit everything from food, clothes, languages to the targets. That restaurant could be viewed as a liaison spot of Chinese intelligence - though it was established under the will of the Feds. How easy it is to apply for a FISA warrant by just sending the targets to that restaurant.
There is also other reason I won't go to that kind of the shop.
C.Y. is a brother of my sister in law. He and his wife W.S.had borrowed my wife's mini van in last May. Since then I alleged them tried to frame a relationship between my family and the Chinese secret police (or maybe "drug gang"? who knows.). (see "668. Chinese secret police (5/5/2011)") The tactic repeated three times, two in his brothers' name - C.Y. has two brothers.
In later February, for the third time in eight months, they asked to borrow the mini van again. The justification were same: they had to pick up their friends in air port with large amount of luggage. Since last May, I turned a cold shoulder to them. They let my brother and sister in law to pick up the car. I refused. I told my sister in law that I thought her brother couple were the Chinese agents and worked for the Feds. They had evil purpose to link my family to the Chinese secret police. I wish such a plain revelation would prevent C.Y. couple from harassing us any more.
One month ago, I trimmed the yard tree with a ladder. At night, the couple called my wife to borrow that ladder. Of course, I refused. I was surprised that even for the revealed snitch, the Feds would try to squeeze them for every bit of it.
Then early this month, I refused a dinner invitation. It was a family meal for my daughter's birthday. The reason I declined to go was I think the owner of that restaurant is a Chinese agent.
In 2000, I returned to the US from drift in South-east Asia. The travel company my wife worked for was moving to Milpitas. That restaurant opened a little bit later was in same shopping center - not far away from the entrance to that travel company. The restaurant supplies Shanghai dishes. The boss - G.X.B of R. was a woman came from Shanghai.
My wife soon became friend of G.X.B of R.. When my relatives came to San Jose, they used to go to that restaurant for the food of homeland taste.
I never go to that restaurant. I am too familiar with Feds' style. They put their snitches as close as possible and fit everything from food, clothes, languages to the targets. That restaurant could be viewed as a liaison spot of Chinese intelligence - though it was established under the will of the Feds. How easy it is to apply for a FISA warrant by just sending the targets to that restaurant.
There is also other reason I won't go to that kind of the shop.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
725. The high speed liquid bullet gun (6/25/2012)
In early 2000, I was in Malaysia. An itch troubled me for some time. Usually if it was a sting of mosquito, it would fade away in a day. But this one caused bad itch and pus and lasted for days. I looked at my foot, the pustule formed a small circle. I thought it was a bite of some unknown insect. I bought some ointment but failed to recover from the itch. It lasted a week or so.
Then I returned to US. My relatives invited me for a lunch Buffet. The restaurant was full. we had to wait for a while. That day I got that bad itch again. It was at the same part of my top foot and in same form - a small circle of pustule wound. I started to suspect that was a spy weapon. I had learned in news of it. I didn't expect I would encounter with it.
K.G.B. used a tiny metal ball with poison in that case. I think I have suffered the same style of attack. I didn't feel any stinging pain. The tiny bullet must be in very high speed. I didn't die like Markov. I think the bullet should contain some virus that causes vital disease. Feds used to make a murder look like a natural death. It could be material causing cancer, or even aids virus? With the limit acknowledge from that story, I originally thought the bullet was metal ball. Now from new information I know it was icy liquid bullet. It said Feds freeze the poisonous liquid as icy bullet and shoot it in high speed that can penetrate clothe and thin shield. I lost the original information but found one with similar principle.
Early this year, my daughter found a job. She invited us for a meal to celeberate. The restaurant was in same shopping center of that Shanghai one (see last message of #724). It was full when we went there. We waited until the waiter led us to a table stands to the wall. Later that day, for the third time, I got that bad itch again after eleven years.
There were common in some points:
1. the wound part used to be on top foot near ankle.(all three times), the latest one added one wound in leg and one in small arm.
2. Bad itch last long time - a week or so. This may mean thick virus liquid.
3. Though the first two wounds showed a regular circle of spots, I didn't see it in third time. They improved their weapon.
4. You won't feel pain when the attack took place. The bullet was tiny and in high speed. You find it hours later when skin started to inflame.
I didn't notice the condition of the first attack but the latter two all happened in restaurant. They were prearranged meal. The restaurant used to be full and you have to wait until there was vacancy. In such an operation, Feds must activate a lot of snitches to be customers so they could arrange the victim to the table that installed with special equipment.
In early 2000, I was in Malaysia. An itch troubled me for some time. Usually if it was a sting of mosquito, it would fade away in a day. But this one caused bad itch and pus and lasted for days. I looked at my foot, the pustule formed a small circle. I thought it was a bite of some unknown insect. I bought some ointment but failed to recover from the itch. It lasted a week or so.
Then I returned to US. My relatives invited me for a lunch Buffet. The restaurant was full. we had to wait for a while. That day I got that bad itch again. It was at the same part of my top foot and in same form - a small circle of pustule wound. I started to suspect that was a spy weapon. I had learned in news of it. I didn't expect I would encounter with it.
K.G.B. used a tiny metal ball with poison in that case. I think I have suffered the same style of attack. I didn't feel any stinging pain. The tiny bullet must be in very high speed. I didn't die like Markov. I think the bullet should contain some virus that causes vital disease. Feds used to make a murder look like a natural death. It could be material causing cancer, or even aids virus? With the limit acknowledge from that story, I originally thought the bullet was metal ball. Now from new information I know it was icy liquid bullet. It said Feds freeze the poisonous liquid as icy bullet and shoot it in high speed that can penetrate clothe and thin shield. I lost the original information but found one with similar principle.
Early this year, my daughter found a job. She invited us for a meal to celeberate. The restaurant was in same shopping center of that Shanghai one (see last message of #724). It was full when we went there. We waited until the waiter led us to a table stands to the wall. Later that day, for the third time, I got that bad itch again after eleven years.
There were common in some points:
1. the wound part used to be on top foot near ankle.(all three times), the latest one added one wound in leg and one in small arm.
2. Bad itch last long time - a week or so. This may mean thick virus liquid.
3. Though the first two wounds showed a regular circle of spots, I didn't see it in third time. They improved their weapon.
4. You won't feel pain when the attack took place. The bullet was tiny and in high speed. You find it hours later when skin started to inflame.
I didn't notice the condition of the first attack but the latter two all happened in restaurant. They were prearranged meal. The restaurant used to be full and you have to wait until there was vacancy. In such an operation, Feds must activate a lot of snitches to be customers so they could arrange the victim to the table that installed with special equipment.
Upvote
0
simultaneous terror drills & real world terror events are so predictable now to be expected.
Upvote
0
726. The surprise turnaround of Chief Justice (7/4/2012)
On 6/28, Supreme Court issued a pass for Obama's Health care policy. What surprised people was Chief Justice Roberts sided with four liberal justices in voting 5-4 to declare the law's "individual mandate" constitutional.
Why did John Roberts, a Bush appointee who generally votes with his conservative colleagues, suddenly change his opinion to vote with the liberal? Just three months ago, he still opposed that "individual mandate" law.
There are different theories about this mysterious turnaround. Mostly were from disinformation office of the Feds to cover up their puppet Roberts. None could solve the puzzle. I know why - the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision. When the Feds want to put Kat Sung under surveillance, they forced the law makers passing through the Patriot Act. (Through OKC bombing and 911 bombing) When the Feds want to restrict Kat Sung in US, they activate the TSA search, (blocking leaving from air flight) blocking the entering of Canada and Mexico; (by "Operation Fast and Furious") see "697. TSA search, Canada and Mexico (12/11/2011)". Now when they want Kat Sung to have a health insurance, they activate their proxy- John Roberts.
Six years ago when Roberts was selected as Chief Justice, I have written already,
"344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)"
The dark side of the USA in Public Forum Forum
This case proves I was very, very accurate at that judgement.
I'll talk about why the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision.
On 6/28, Supreme Court issued a pass for Obama's Health care policy. What surprised people was Chief Justice Roberts sided with four liberal justices in voting 5-4 to declare the law's "individual mandate" constitutional.
Why did John Roberts, a Bush appointee who generally votes with his conservative colleagues, suddenly change his opinion to vote with the liberal? Just three months ago, he still opposed that "individual mandate" law.
There are different theories about this mysterious turnaround. Mostly were from disinformation office of the Feds to cover up their puppet Roberts. None could solve the puzzle. I know why - the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision. When the Feds want to put Kat Sung under surveillance, they forced the law makers passing through the Patriot Act. (Through OKC bombing and 911 bombing) When the Feds want to restrict Kat Sung in US, they activate the TSA search, (blocking leaving from air flight) blocking the entering of Canada and Mexico; (by "Operation Fast and Furious") see "697. TSA search, Canada and Mexico (12/11/2011)". Now when they want Kat Sung to have a health insurance, they activate their proxy- John Roberts.
Six years ago when Roberts was selected as Chief Justice, I have written already,
"344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)"
The dark side of the USA in Public Forum Forum
This case proves I was very, very accurate at that judgement.
I'll talk about why the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision.
Upvote
0
727. Rush to frame a case on 7/9 (7/9/2012)
On 7/4, I wrote about the mysterious turnaround of Chief Justice Roberts and promised to tell "why he did so" in next(today's) post. Now I'm afraid I can't do so because next day of 7/4 there was a swift response from the Feds.
I used to post new articles in a cycle of "5 days, 9 days ...." interval. 7/9 is the day I post a new article. Due to the accuracy of my analysis, The Feds seems decided not to let people know the coming plot by blogging my access to the internet. What alarms me is they'll frame a new drug case.
What the news doesn't mention is that the technique will be from China. In a time when money is so tight in state budget, what is it for to waste on such an uncertain project that mainly benefits China? I view it as a payment of secret deal between the secret police of China and US to exchange for a framed drug case.
The two events took place just within two days after 7/4. They were done in a rush and planned to frame a case on 7/9.
On 7/4, I wrote about the mysterious turnaround of Chief Justice Roberts and promised to tell "why he did so" in next(today's) post. Now I'm afraid I can't do so because next day of 7/4 there was a swift response from the Feds.
I used to post new articles in a cycle of "5 days, 9 days ...." interval. 7/9 is the day I post a new article. Due to the accuracy of my analysis, The Feds seems decided not to let people know the coming plot by blogging my access to the internet. What alarms me is they'll frame a new drug case.
What the news doesn't mention is that the technique will be from China. In a time when money is so tight in state budget, what is it for to waste on such an uncertain project that mainly benefits China? I view it as a payment of secret deal between the secret police of China and US to exchange for a framed drug case.
The two events took place just within two days after 7/4. They were done in a rush and planned to frame a case on 7/9.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- May 29, 2012
- 41,108
- 24,128
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
