- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,060
- 51,500
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
What part of cosmic evolution is abiogenesis under?
Of course the ladder has a first rung. Something happened to bring life into existence from non-living matter. At this point, scientists can't say exactly what it was. But whatever it was was not the same as what produces the diversity of life after it began. So, it is uneducated and simple-minded to assert that it is useless to study the mechanism producing the diversity of life until science an tell us how it began.Abiogenesis is not part of evolution. The ladder has no first rung. You can jump to a second rung with an implied first rung, but if you in any way indicate that the ladder has to have a first rung you are an uneducated simple minded person who doesn't understand evolution.
Science cannot account for the origination of anything.
Well, your buddy Google narrowed the field for you to seven choices.
Actually it is.It's not.
So it's under chemical evolution then?Larnievc said:Abiogenesis is biochemistry, not cosmology.
Hey, chief, I frankly don't care what it is and isn't.It's biochemistry, not cosmology.
Chemical evolution says all elements evolved from hydrogen.What is "chemical evolution?"
Well, your buddy Google narrowed the field for you to seven choices.
Care to tell us which one?
After all, I'm just ignit when it comes to evolution.
It's your philosophy, not mine.Nope. Not doing your own work for you.
It's your philosophy, not mine.
No, the only one who seems to find these sorts of things a challenge is you and you alone. As they say, Google is your friend.Now you know why I called this a challenge, don't you?
What non-living matter?Something happened to bring life into existence from non-living matter.
Not exactly. Matter can be converted to energy and energy to matter; together the two of them together cannot, so far as we know, be created or destroyed, only converted from one to the other.What non-living matter?
The matter that cannot be created or destroyed; only changed in form to a lesser form of heat energy?
Who's to say? But since matter appears to have existed before life, it is a reasonable working assumption, especially as living things are made of matter.Who's to say it came from non-living matter?
Who says it did? I gather that the current speculation is that it came from something called the "quantum vacuum" which is not the same as nothingness. Alternatively, some hold that mass/energy has always existed in some form or another. Nothingness doesn't come into it.If matter can begin from nothingness...
What natural law would that be?...in defiance of natural law...
....in the same way the Big Bang is not part of Atomic Theory. Who says you can't teach Creationists?Abiogenesis is not part of evolution.
...aww, Nope - back to being broken. -_-The ladder has no first rung. You can jump to a second rung with an implied first rung, but if you in any way indicate that the ladder has to have a first rung you are an uneducated simple minded person who doesn't understand evolution.
Science cannot account for the origination of anything.
Which came first? matter or life?But since matter appears to have existed before life,
What do you mean by that?And did the life matter?