No I got that part of the post. However I still find it offensive. This is another excellent reason to oppose school vouchers. IF we ever allow for school vouchers where people can use tax money to send their children to these priviate schools, the schools should no longer be allowed to practice these sorts of offensive acts. They cannot have it both ways, if you want to be priviate fine, but if you take one penny of public funds you should be no longer allowed to act in such a shameful manner as this school has done. Just because they are a priviate school, and even if they can get away with doing it, this still does not make what they did right!
I think already is the case - if a school receives voucher and gov funding, then the gov can at its leisure come into a school and tell it what it can and cannot do.
One of our synod school currently takes vouchers and has one of the highest enrollments. I shudder to think about the consequences when the gov finally does come in and tell this school what they cannot teach.
Oh, and did you know that churches and religious organizations don't have to display an EEO poster? Course, we have to pay the gov $1000 to do it...
Upvote
0